Making Sense with Sam Harris
Making Sense with Sam Harris

#135 — Navigating Sex and Gender

Sam Harris speaks with Martie Haselton about sex and gender, the role of hormones in human psychology, "Darwinian feminism," the unique hormonal experience of women, transgenderism, the Google Memo, and other topics. If the Making Sense podcast logo in your player is BLACK, you can SUBSCRI

Featured Speakers

Waking Up with Sam Harris HostSam Harris Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Sam Harris opens with a forceful denunciation of Catholic clergy sex abuse and institutional cover-up, then defends ad-free, listener-funded podcasting. The main interview with psychologist Martie Haselton explores evolutionary psychology, hormones, and the meanings of sex, gender, intersex, transgender, and non-binary identity, emphasizing biological variation while resisting simplistic binaries.

Main Topics: Catholic Church sexual abuse and institutional cover-up (Priority: 5/5): Harris argues the Pennsylvania grand jury findings reveal not isolated misconduct but a system shaped by doctrine, secrecy, celibacy, and shame that enabled abuse and concealment over centuries. Why the podcast is ad-free and listener-supported (Priority: 4/5): Harris explains that ads create conflicts of interest and pressure honesty, arguing direct audience funding is the most transparent model for sustaining independent media. Evolutionary psychology and hormonal mechanisms (Priority: 4/5): Haselton outlines her interdisciplinary approach: using evolutionary logic, psychology, endocrinology, and comparative animal research to understand human intimate behavior and social life. Defining sex, gender, and sexual identity (Priority: 5/5): The discussion distinguishes biological sex from gendered traits and identity, while noting conceptual ambiguity and the practical need for clearer language in science and public discourse. Intersex, transgender, non-binary, and sexuality variation (Priority: 4/5): Haselton and Harris probe whether sexual orientation and other non-binary patterns should be understood as forms of intersex-like variation, stressing that human sexuality is diverse and classification systems are imperfect. Feminism, taboo, and free speech in science (Priority: 3/5): The conversation frames debates over sex differences and transgender issues as politically charged but scientifically important, with Harris and Haselton emphasizing open inquiry over ideological constraint.

Key Arguments: The Catholic Church’s abuse crisis is not merely a statistical byproduct of scale; Harris argues the institution’s theology and structure actively selected for and protected abusers. Doctrine around celibacy, hell, sin, and shame over sexuality created conditions that helped conceal abuse and punish victims, especially vulnerable children and unwed mothers. Listener-supported funding is preferable to ads because it minimizes conflicts of interest and preserves the host’s ability to speak candidly. Human behavior cannot be explained by biology alone, but evolution and hormones are crucial for understanding sex-linked behavior and intimate relationships. Sex and gender should be distinguished conceptually: sex refers to biological dimorphism, while gender refers more to masculinity/femininity and identity-related variation. Human sexuality exhibits wide variation; some forms of attraction or identity may challenge binary categories and require better scientific language. Open discussion of controversial topics like transgender identity and sex differences is necessary despite social taboos because these issues affect science, politics, and personal lives.

Data Points: Children abused in Pennsylvania clergy scandal: more than 1,000 - Harris cites the grand jury report detailing abuse in Pennsylvania. Priests implicated in Pennsylvania report: more than 300 - Harris references the scale of clergy abuse and cover-up. Podcast ad-break length: 6 minutes and 45 seconds - Harris tells listeners they can skip the funding appeal section. Funding price example: $3 - Used as an example of a small monthly listener contribution comparable to a cup of coffee. Article year referenced: 2009 - Harris says he wrote the original Vatican article around then. Podcast support cost example: $3 for a cup of coffee - Used to argue that small recurring support is reasonable for valued media. Listener-supported duration: ongoing recurring support - Harris notes a small percentage of listeners already fund the podcast monthly or per-episode.

Pivotal Quotes: "This is pure evil, and the details are in. Insane." — Sam Harris: Harris reacting to the Pennsylvania grand jury findings and institutional concealment. "The ideology of our organization acts as a filter attracting sexually confused, conflicted, and conscienceless men." — Sam Harris: A hypothetical Catholic Church user agreement illustrating his critique of the institution's structure. "I don't want to create any incentives that could make it more difficult for me to simply tell you what I think." — Sam Harris: Explaining why he refuses podcast advertising.

Implications: The episode argues for sharper scrutiny of religious institutions, more independent media funding models, and more scientifically honest, less taboo-driven discussion of sex and gender. The interview signals continued pressure to refine language and evidence around identity and biology.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Making Sense with Sam Harris

Join neuroscientist, philosopher, and five-time New York Times best-selling author Sam Harris as he explores important and controversial questions about the mind, society, current events, moral philosophy, religion, and rationality—with an overarching focus on how a growing understanding of ourselves and the world is changing our sense of how we should live. Sam is also the creator of the Waking Up app. Combining Sam’s decades of mindfulness practice, profound wisdom from varied philosophical...

View all episodes from Making Sense with Sam Harris