The Michael Shermer Show
The Michael Shermer Show

269. Richard Dawkins — Flights of Fancy: Defying Gravity by Design and Evolution

Do you sometimes dream you can fly like a bird? Gliding effortlessly above the treetops, soaring and swooping, playing and dodging through the third dimension. Computer games, virtual reality headsets, and some drugs can lift our imagination and fly us through fabled, magical spaces. But it's n

Featured Speakers

Michael Shermer GuestRichard Dawkins Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Michael Shermer and Richard Dawkins discuss Dawkins' illustrated book 'Flights of Fancy,' using flight as a lens on evolution, natural selection, convergent evolution, aerodynamics, and human innovation. They cover the origins of wings in birds, bats, insects, penguins, and gliders; the physics of lift; why flight is costly and often lost; and why dispersal, exploration, and even Mars settlement reflect deep evolutionary tendencies.

Main Topics: Flight as an evolutionary problem: Dawkins explains how flight can arise through gradual, adaptive steps, including gliding, tree-leaping, ground-up locomotion, and thermoregulation-related precursors, rebutting the 'what good is half a wing?' objection. Physics of lift and different flying mechanisms: The conversation contrasts Newtonian and Bernoulli explanations of lift and compares vertebrate flight with insect flight, including hummingbird hovering and the distinct mechanisms used by birds, bats, pterosaurs, and insects. Convergent evolution and design without a designer: Shermer and Dawkins emphasize that similar environmental constraints can repeatedly produce similar body plans and functions, making biology look designed even though natural selection is a bottom-up process. Loss of flight and evolutionary tradeoffs: They discuss how island species like flightless cormorants and some birds lose flight because it is energetically expensive when predators are absent, showing that natural selection favors cost-effective traits rather than flight per se. Human invention, innovation, and powered flight: The Wright brothers, Paul McCready, the Gossamer Albatross, and electric cars are used as examples of cumulative innovation, incremental engineering, and the role of materials, prizes, and iteration in technological progress. Dispersal, space travel, and the outward urge: Dawkins links biological dispersal of seeds and offspring to human ambition to explore space, arguing that leaving home is a deep evolutionary pattern that helps explain Mars colonization instincts. Science, religion, and taboo topics: The discussion broadens to public acceptance of evolution, faith-based exceptions to scientific reasoning, social backlash against controversial research, and debates over whether some topics should be off-limits.

Key Arguments: Half a wing can still be useful because any small increase in membrane surface can improve jumping or gliding distance, creating a selectable gradient toward full flight. Birds, bats, pterosaurs, and insects evolved flight independently, showing that similar physical constraints can repeatedly generate similar solutions. Natural selection does not aim at species-level improvement; it favors whatever traits improve reproductive success in a given environment. Flight is costly, so on isolated islands or in low-predation contexts, lineages often lose the ability to fly. Convergent evolution supports the idea that life elsewhere may develop similar functional solutions if environments and physics are comparable. The apparent design of wings and other organs is better explained by cumulative natural selection than by intelligent design. Human technological breakthroughs, like the Wright brothers and McCready's aircraft, are incremental and collaborative rather than sudden or singular. Dispersal is adaptive because staying in one place concentrates risk; spreading offspring or colonies improves survival over time. Science should remain distinct from cultural mythologies; creation stories may be studied as mythology, but not treated as equivalent to scientific explanations.

Data Points: Flightless cormorant habitat: Galápagos Islands - Example of birds losing flight when predators are absent and diving becomes more useful than flying. Gliding distance: about 100 yards or more - Used to illustrate how small membrane changes can improve tree-to-tree locomotion in flying squirrels and similar animals. Bird origins: birds are dinosaurs - Dawkins notes that birds are surviving dinosaurs and that many dinosaurs had feathers. Ant wing use: for mating - Queen and male ants use wings to disperse, mate, then queens shed wings to found new nests. Wright brothers first powered flight: 1903 - The first powered flight is discussed as a milestone built on prior glider experimentation. Wright brothers first flight date: December 17, 1903 - Referenced as the date of the first successful powered flight. Human-powered flight milestone: crossing the English Channel - Paul McCready's Gossamer Albatross achievement is described as a prize-driven engineering breakthrough. Evolution acceptance in the U.S.: over 50% - Shermer and Dawkins discuss a 2020 study showing public acceptance of evolution finally surpassing half of Americans. Decadal IQ gain: about 3 points per decade - Referenced as the Flynn effect, showing rising measured IQ scores over time. SETI expectation: radio signals more likely than bodily visitation - Dawkins says he would be less surprised by an extraterrestrial radio signal than by physical alien visitors.

Pivotal Quotes: "What good is half a wing?" — Michael Shermer: Introduces the classic objection to gradual evolution of flight and frames the discussion of intermediate forms. "Birds actually are dinosaurs." — Richard Dawkins: Used to explain that birds evolved from within dinosaurs and that feathers existed before flight. "The illusion of design, as we now know, is so powerful that people never even occurred to anybody that it could possibly be anything but designed by a designer." — Richard Dawkins: Explains why natural selection was such a revolutionary explanation for biological complexity.

Implications: The episode reinforces that evolution explains design-like features through cumulative selection, not foresight. It also suggests that technological and scientific progress are iterative, collaborative, and constrained by physics, with implications for bio-inspired engineering and space exploration.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About The Michael Shermer Show

View all episodes from The Michael Shermer Show