The Michael Shermer Show
The Michael Shermer Show

274. Frans De Waal on Sex and Gender Across the Primate Spectrum

What is gender? How different are men and women? Are differences due to biological sex or to culture? How do they compare with what is known about our fellow primates? Do apes also culturally learn their sex roles or is "gender" uniquely human? Shermer and de Waal discuss: sex and gender i

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Michael Shermer interviews primatologist Frans de Waal about his book Different and how primate behavior can illuminate sex, gender, sexuality, violence, caregiving, and social organization. They argue biology matters alongside culture, that human variation is best understood as overlapping spectra rather than rigid binaries, and that primate evidence complicates simplistic political claims about gender roles and family structures.

Main Topics: Sex vs. gender: biology and identity: De Waal distinguishes biological sex (largely binary, based on gametes/chromosomes) from gender (identity/expression, more flexible and culturally shaped), arguing that gender still remains tied to sex and cannot be treated as purely cultural. Primates as a window into human nature: The conversation returns repeatedly to chimps and bonobos as close relatives that reveal patterns in aggression, bonding, sexuality, caregiving, and hierarchy, though de Waal warns against simplistic one-to-one comparisons. Bonobos vs. chimpanzees as contrasting social strategies: Bonobos are described as female-bonded, peaceful, and sexually expansive; chimpanzees as more male-bonded, competitive, and violent. De Waal argues both species help explain different facets of human behavior, rather than forcing a choice between them. Female sexuality, choice, and reproductive behavior: The interview challenges Victorian assumptions that females are passive. De Waal emphasizes active female mate choice, female-female sex, orgasm as potentially functional for bonding, and the importance of context in interpreting reproduction-related behaviors. Violence, rape, and male control: De Waal rejects rape-as-adaptation arguments and frames much violence as tied to male-male competition, dominance, and social control rather than reproductive strategy. He links modern domestic abuse and abortion politics to broader patterns of male control over reproduction. Caregiving, paternity, and family structure: The discussion highlights evidence that male primates can be nurturing and that human fathers likely evolved stronger caregiving roles, helping explain shortened inter-birth intervals and the success of cooperative breeding and pair bonding in humans. Language, cognition, and human uniqueness: De Waal says most cognitive differences between humans and other primates are differences of degree, but language is a major exception: symbolic, learned language allows reference to absent events and may have emerged first through gesture.

Key Arguments: Gender cannot be fully separated from biology; identity and expression are flexible, but they develop in bodies with a biological sex. Human debates about trans identity and homosexuality are often distorted when biology is either overused as a weapon or excluded entirely from discussion. Bonobos and chimpanzees represent two valid evolutionary models—female coalitions and male coalitions—both of which illuminate human social behavior. Female primates are not passive; they show choice, strategy, cooperation, and sometimes sexual behavior for reasons beyond reproduction. Rape is not well supported as an evolved reproductive adaptation because it is rare in primates, often non-reproductive in humans, and not shown to increase male reproductive success. Male violence is generally higher than female violence across primates and humans, largely because males compete intensely with one another for status and mating opportunities. Human fathers are biologically capable of caregiving; paternity leave and male investment in child-rearing reflect evolved capacities, not just cultural preferences. Language is the clearest major cognitive difference between humans and other primates, enabling symbolic communication about absent events and abstract ideas. Overly binary thinking misrepresents biology; individual variation is a core feature of primate and human populations.

Data Points: Number of books by Frans de Waal mentioned: 13 - Shermer notes that Different is de Waal’s 13th book. Estimated human sex categorization: 98–99% binary - De Waal says biological sex is mostly male/female, with a small but complex intermediate range. Human common ancestry with chimps/bonobos: 6–8 million years ago - Shermer references the divergence time to question simplistic comparisons. Chimpanzee sexual maturity: 16 years - De Waal says chimpanzees are adults at about 16. Chimpanzee nursing period: 5 years - Used to illustrate long dependency and development in apes. Lethal aggression cases in wild bonobos and chimpanzees: 152 cases - De Waal cites a recent study comparing lethal aggression in the two species. Bonobo lethal aggression cases: 1 suspected case - Of the 152 cases, only one involved bonobos and was not directly observed. Inter-birth interval in chimps/bonobos: 5–6 years - De Waal contrasts this with humans to explain the effect of male caregiving. Inter-birth interval in humans: 3–4 years - He argues male involvement in humans helps shorten the interval. Frequency estimate for atypical primate individuals: 1 in 10 to 1 in 20 - De Waal says gender-diverse or nonconforming individuals are often ignored because they are relatively uncommon.

Pivotal Quotes: "I think the men of this country have decided that they are in charge of the bodies of women." — Frans de Waal: On the abortion debate and abortion restrictions as male control over female reproduction. "I don't think anyone would have invented genders there." — Frans de Waal: On the claim that gender is purely cultural and would exist even in a cloning species. "Language is really special. It's a learned symbolic communication." — Frans de Waal: On the primary cognitive difference between humans and other primates.

Implications: Listeners are encouraged to replace rigid binary assumptions with a biology-plus-culture framework. The book and interview suggest policies on gender, parenting, and violence should reflect human variability, primate evidence, and the real capacities of both sexes.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About The Michael Shermer Show

View all episodes from The Michael Shermer Show