Empire: World History
Empire: World History

285. Suez Crisis: The Secret Meeting Between Israel, Britain & France (Part 2)

Why did France & Britain secretly collude with Israel against Egypt? What did America think was going on in Suez? Why did the Soviets think the US was behind an uprising in Hungary? William and Anita are joined once again by Alex Von Tunzelmann, author of Blood and Sand: Suez, Hungary, & The

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode traces the escalation from Anthony Eden’s personal fixation on Nasser to the 1956 Suez Crisis, showing how Nasser’s nationalization of the canal, secret Anglo-French-Israeli collusion, and rushed military planning produced a brittle, exposed operation. The discussion then crosscuts to Hungary’s 1956 uprising, arguing that the simultaneous crises created a global atmosphere of paranoia and raised fears of World War III.

Main Topics: Eden’s obsession with Nasser (Priority: 5/5): The hosts describe Eden’s hostility to Nasser as personal, emotional, and increasingly unhinged, culminating in his private remark that he wanted Nasser killed. Nasser nationalizes the Suez Canal (Priority: 5/5): Nasser’s July 1956 move is presented as a dramatic, legally defensible assertion of Egyptian sovereignty after Western funding for the Aswan Dam was withdrawn. Anglo-French planning and secret collusion with Israel (Priority: 5/5): Britain and France abandon an open invasion plan and secretly coordinate with Israel in the Protocol of Sèvres to create a casus belli and justify intervention. The limits of American support (Priority: 4/5): The CIA viewed Nasser as a usable, non-communist nationalist, while Eisenhower forcefully opposed military action and warned Eden against using force. Hungary’s uprising and Soviet alarm (Priority: 4/5): The transcript links the Hungarian revolt against Stalinist rule to the Middle East crisis, emphasizing Khrushchev’s fear that both flashpoints were part of a larger U.S.-led strategy. Collapse of strategic credibility (Priority: 4/5): The ultimatum and invasion timetable are shown as so unrealistic that the cover story quickly falls apart, exposing the operation as nonsensical.

Key Arguments: Eden’s hatred of Nasser was personal and extreme; it was not a normal diplomatic disagreement but a fixation that led him to contemplate murder. Nasser’s nationalization of the canal was not illegal, since the canal remained Egyptian even though the operating company had international investors. The U.S. government, especially Eisenhower, opposed an Anglo-French invasion from the outset and actively warned against it. The CIA saw Nasser as a pragmatic, anti-communist nationalist who could be negotiated with, unlike how Britain perceived him. The secret war plan depended on a false Israeli invasion pretext, but the timing and terms were so implausible that the deception was immediately obvious. Hungary and Suez together intensified Cold War paranoia because each side misread the other’s actions as coordinated global aggression. The episode argues that 1956 was one of the most dangerous moments of the Cold War precisely because leaders lacked direct communication and assumed worst-case intentions.

Data Points: Date of Eden–Nasser dinner: February 1955 - The hostile interpersonal dynamic that set up Eden’s later reaction Nasser’s canal nationalization: 26 July 1956 - The date of the speech in Alexandria announcing the takeover Eisenhower’s warning letter: 31 July 1956 - Eisenhower wrote Eden a strong letter opposing immediate military force Aswan Dam funding withdrawal: just days before 26 July 1956 - Western withdrawal of support helped trigger Nasser’s decision Assassination attempt on Nasser: 8 shots fired from 25 feet - The earlier Muslim Brotherhood attack in Manchya Square that cemented Nasser’s reputation Crowd size in Alexandria: about a quarter of a million - People packed into Manchya Square for Nasser’s speech British-French ultimatum: 12 hours - The deadline issued on 30 October 1956 for both Egypt and Israel to withdraw Israeli advance distance in ultimatum context: 115 miles - Israel was being asked to withdraw/advance under an ultimatum that didn’t match battlefield reality Egyptian withdrawal distance in ultimatum context: 135 miles - The ultimatum absurdly required Egypt to withdraw far beyond the canal zone Hungarian uprising date: 23 October 1956 - The start of the Budapest uprising Hungarian protest crowd: 200,000–300,000 - Estimated size of the Budapest demonstrations Stalin’s death: 1953 - Used to frame Khrushchev’s de-Stalinization and the loosening of Soviet control Time between canal nationalization and the allied ultimatum: 4 days - From 26 July to 30 July, showing how quickly the crisis escalated

Pivotal Quotes: "I want him murdered." — Anthony Eden: Eden’s private instruction to minister Anthony Nutting about Nasser "your decision to employ force without delay or attempting any intermediate and less drastic steps." — Dwight D. Eisenhower: Eisenhower’s strongly worded warning letter to Eden about invading Egypt "Today, in the name of the people, I'm taking over the company." — Gamal Abdel Nasser: Nasser’s announcement in Alexandria that the Suez Canal Company was being nationalized

Implications: The episode shows how personal animus, imperial overreach, and misread global events can combine into strategic disaster. It also highlights how 1956 reshaped Cold War politics, exposing the fragility of Anglo-American trust and the volatility of postcolonial and Soviet bloc crises.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Empire: World History

View all episodes from Empire: World History