Excess Returns
Excess Returns

31 Years of Lessons: Northwestern Mutual CIO Brent Schutte on Markets, Cycles, and Diversification

In this episode of Excess Returns, we sit down with Brent Schutte, CIO of Northwestern Mutual, to discuss the current macro landscape and what it means for investors. Brent shares his balanced perspective on the Fed, inflation, tariffs, concentration risk in markets, and why diversification may be m

Featured Speakers

Excess Returns Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The conversation argues that markets are entering a more uncertain regime marked by tariff-driven inflation risk, slower growth, tighter labor conditions, and unusually high market concentration. Brent emphasizes diversification, humility, and a broader multi-asset approach because the Fed may be challenged on both sides of its mandate and the winners of recent cycles may not lead the next one.

Main Topics: Fed mandate, inflation, and growth risks: Brent says tariffs, sticky inflation, and a late-cycle economy could put both unemployment and inflation at risk, forcing the Fed to balance weakening growth against renewed price pressure. Diversification as the primary defense: He repeatedly argues that investors should not concentrate in a few stocks or rely on a single regime, but instead hedge multiple scenarios across asset classes. Market concentration and narrow leadership: The discussion highlights how the S&P 500’s performance has become heavily dependent on a small set of mega-cap names, which he sees as a classic late-cycle warning sign. Recession indicators, labor-market breadth, and AI spending: He explains that hiring has become narrow, many recession indicators are flashing yellow, but AI-related investment and government stimulus may be delaying a downturn. Portfolio construction in an inflationary world: Brent revisits the role of commodities, international equities, small/mid caps, and bonds, arguing that the classic 60/40 may still work but should be expanded for inflation risk. Lessons from prior regime shifts: He uses examples from 1999-2000, the 1970s, 1989, and post-COVID markets to show that leadership changes, recency bias is dangerous, and history often rhymes. Active management, valuation, and process discipline: The conversation closes with his framework for evaluating managers, his skepticism of chasing momentum, and his emphasis on valuation, process, and staying true to risk tolerance.

Key Arguments: Tariffs function like a tax and could simultaneously slow growth and keep inflation sticky, creating risk on both sides of the Fed’s mandate. The current environment is late-cycle: unemployment is low, the output gap is closed, and historically this is when risk builds before a downturn. Diversification matters more now because multiple plausible paths exist and no one can know the outcome of tariff experimentation or policy shifts. Market concentration is dangerous because companies, unlike clinicians, can disappear; owning only a few winners can create severe drawdowns. Recent market leadership may not persist; history shows that the top names in one cycle are often not the leaders in the next. AI and massive capex may be extending the cycle, but they have not yet translated into broad-based hiring or proven revenue gains for most firms. Investors should own real assets, international stocks, and small/mid caps to hedge both inflation and growth shocks. The role of the investor is not to maximize risk-taking but to stay aligned with true risk tolerance and avoid emotional, concentrated bets. History and valuation still matter because behaviorally flawed market participants repeat similar mistakes across cycles.

Data Points: Fed inflation target not met: Since 2021 - Brent says the Fed has not returned inflation to its 2% mandate since 2021. Industries hiring breadth: 46.8% - He cites recent months with less than 50% of industries hiring, including a 46.8% reading. S&P 500 concentration: About 34% - He says the Mag 7 now represent roughly 34% of the S&P 500. Annual S&P 500 returns: 25% in 2023 and 25% in 2024 - Used to illustrate how a small group of stocks drove recent index gains. Companies outperforming the index: Less than 30% - He notes that fewer than 30% of companies outperformed the index in the recent two-year period, underscoring narrow breadth. Average effective tariff rate: 2.3% to 18.6% - He says the U.S. effective tariff rate rose from 2.3% at end-2024 to 18.6% if proposed tariffs are implemented. Effective tariff rate in June: 9.1% - He references a Wharton Penn estimate for the tariff rate in June. Goods inflation: 1.2% year-over-year - He says goods inflation has remained unusually low and that 1.2% is notable historically. Wage threshold for Fed concern: About 4.2% year-over-year - He says the Fed has historically raised rates when wages average around 4.2% growth. Household equity allocation: Highest since the 1940s - He says households currently have the highest equity allocation in the data he can measure. Valuation level: Second highest since the 1880s - He says valuations are near the second-highest level on several measures going back to the 1880s. Equity vs economy size: Market is 2x the economy - He uses this to describe wealth effects and why market moves matter for spending. Small and mid-cap valuation: Cheapest since 1999-2000 - He says small and mid caps are trading at relative valuations not seen since the dot-com era. Return comparison, 2000-2025: Mid caps 9.7%, small caps 9.5%, large caps 7.7% annualized - He cites these figures to argue that smaller-cap stocks have outperformed over the long run despite recent large-cap dominance. Bond protection years when S&P was negative: 21 of 26 years - He says bonds hedged negative annual S&P 500 years in 21 of 26 cases since 1926. Years bonds failed in down S&P years: 1933, 1946, 1969, 1973, 2022 - He names the five exceptions where bonds did not hedge stocks well. Commodity performance in those exceptions: Up double digits in 4 of 5 - He says commodities were strong in four of the five years when bonds failed. Generative AI revenue conversion: 95% of companies have not figured it out - He cites an MIT study suggesting most firms have not yet used gen AI to raise revenue. Yield curve / recession indicators: Broad mosaic, no single indicator - He emphasizes that he uses a preponderance of evidence rather than a lone recession signal. Historical market breadth comparison: 1973, 1980, 1998-1999 - He says the current narrowness in breadth is comparable to a few historically fragile periods.

Pivotal Quotes: "“The clances don't die, they just go to sleep for while companies do.”" — Brent: He uses this to explain why owning a few dominant stocks is riskier than many investors assume. "“I fear right now that a lot of Wall Street thinks they exist to help people take risk. And I don't think people need help taking risk right now.”" — Brent: This captures his core view that investors should be more cautious and true to risk tolerance. "“Diversification to me still is the best path for dealing with multiple paths forward.”" — Brent: His central portfolio message in an uncertain, late-cycle environment.

Implications: Listeners should expect more regime uncertainty, potential volatility from tariffs and policy shifts, and a possible broadening away from mega-cap leadership. The practical takeaway is to diversify across assets, sectors, and styles rather than chase recent winners.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Excess Returns

Excess Returns is dedicated to making you a better long-term investor and making complex investing topics understandable. Join Jack Forehand, Justin Carbonneau and Matt Zeigler as they sit down with some of the most interesting names in finance to discuss topics like macroeconomics, value investing, factor investing, and more.

View all episodes from Excess Returns