Empire: World History
Empire: World History

37. The Armenian Genocide: Death Marches

The secret orders have been given. The Armenian community is to be destroyed. Ordered to march across the desert, to unsupplied camps in Deir ez-Zor. Listen as William and Anita are, for the final time, joined by Eugene Rogan to discuss the end of the Genocide and its aftermath. LRB Empire offer: lr

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode concludes Empire's two-part discussion of the Armenian genocide, focusing on how deportations became death marches, the roles of Ottoman authorities and foreign witnesses, the parallel suffering of Assyrian Christians, postwar retribution and tribunals, and the long legacy of denial in Turkey. It argues the genocide was deliberate, widely documented, and still politically sensitive today.

Main Topics: Deportation as a mechanism of extermination (Priority: 5/5): Eugene Rogan explains that Armenian men were often separated and killed, while women, children, and the elderly were concentrated in towns and then marched into the Syrian desert, especially toward Aleppo and Deir ez-Zor, where death was effectively built into the route. The reality of the death marches (Priority: 5/5): The conversation describes how deportees were moved in large caravans without being chained, guarded by Ottoman troops who killed stragglers, and exposed to bayonets, dehydration, sunstroke, rape, and abandonment. Personal rescue, forced adoption, and conversion also feature as part of the atrocity. Independent corroboration from non-Armenian witnesses (Priority: 4/5): The hosts and guest discuss corroborating accounts from figures such as Donato Consuelos, German ambassador von Wangenheim, Henry Morgenthau, and American missionaries, emphasizing that the atrocities were documented beyond Armenian testimony. Violence against Assyrian Christians (Priority: 4/5): The episode broadens the frame beyond Armenians to include Assyrian Christians, who experienced similar uprooting, death marches, and sieges, but have received less public recognition and organized remembrance. War, retaliation, and reciprocal atrocity (Priority: 3/5): The discussion acknowledges Armenian violence against Muslim villages in Russian-occupied zones, showing how wartime reprisals and ethnicized violence escalated on multiple fronts while not diminishing the genocide itself. Postwar accountability and Operation Nemesis (Priority: 4/5): After the Ottoman defeat, leading Young Turks fled, were targeted by Armenian assassins under Operation Nemesis, and the successor Ottoman government created public tribunals to prosecute genocide-related crimes, though justice was incomplete and later faded. Denial, memory, and modern political constraints (Priority: 5/5): The episode traces Turkish denial from censorship and legal restrictions to disputes over the word 'genocide,' while noting recent openings among Turkish scholars, civil society, and economic interests that may encourage acknowledgment and regional reconciliation.

Key Arguments: The deportations were not neutral relocations; they were structured so many Armenians would die, especially through desert marches to Deir ez-Zor. The Ottoman state did not always explicitly order extermination of women and children, but its policy of displacement, starvation, and exposure still made survival unlikely. Independent sources outside the Armenian community confirm the scale and character of the atrocities, including German, American, and Ottoman-dissident testimony. Assyrian Christians suffered comparable violence, but their experience has been less fully memorialized or internationally recognized. Armenian retaliatory violence in war zones existed, but it does not negate the asymmetry or intentionality of Ottoman state violence against Armenians. Postwar tribunals and assassinations show that accountability was pursued, but only partially, and political will quickly weakened. Denial in Turkey is not simply organic forgetting; it has been actively imposed through law, education, censorship, and nationalist narratives. Rogan explicitly classifies the events as genocide under the UN definition and argues recognition should come first from Turkey itself.

Data Points: Opening date of genocide arrests: 24 April 1915 - Referenced as the arrest date of Armenian leaders in Constantinople, treated as the symbolic opening of the genocide. Approximate Armenian population in the Ottoman Empire before WWI: around 2 million - Rogan’s estimate for the prewar Armenian population in the Ottoman Empire. Estimated number killed: around 1 million - Rogan’s best estimate of deaths during the genocide, noting the figure remains contested. Alternative death toll cited in Ottoman memoir: 900,000 - Jemal Pasha’s memoir is said to acknowledge massacres killing 900,000. Upper-range death estimates mentioned: 1.5 million to 2.5 million - The hosts note higher figures used by some Armenian claims and court-era estimates. End of Ottoman war and armistice: October 1918 - The armistice triggers flight of the Young Turk triumvirate and postwar accountability efforts. Year of visible legal/cultural controversy in Britain: 2007 - Referenced in connection with a newspaper editor killed after publishing on the Armenian genocide. Year of Rogan’s Ankara talk: 2016 - Used to illustrate pragmatic Turkish interest in confronting the past for tourism and trade. Number of countries using the term genocide: 30 - Rogan says about 30 countries have formally used the term for the Armenian case.

Pivotal Quotes: "The Ottomans were trying to, and this is a quote, exterminate the Armenian race in the Turkish Empire." — Eugene Rogan: Discussing German ambassador von Wangenheim’s reporting to Berlin. "Deir Zor had the echoes of death to it in the ears of Armenians because to get to Deir Zor, you had to cross some of the most inhospitable desert." — Eugene Rogan: Explaining why the deportation destination became synonymous with death. "I definitely use the word genocide." — Eugene Rogan: Rogan’s direct answer on whether the Armenian events meet the UN definition of genocide.

Implications: The episode reinforces the genocide as a historically documented, state-driven atrocity whose memory remains politically contested. It suggests meaningful progress depends on Turkish acknowledgment, while broader recognition is constrained by geopolitics, nationalism, and the politics of remembrance.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Empire: World History

View all episodes from Empire: World History