Empire: World History
Empire: World History

44. The Legacy of the Ottomans, Queen of the Desert, and giant turbans

How did Ataturk view the Ottomans? What is the status of the Ottoman Empire today? Who was Gertrude Bell? And how did Ottomans wear such big turbans? Listen as William and Anita answer your questions in our end of series Q&A. LRB Empire offer: lrb.me/empire This episode is sponsored by BetterHel

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: A Q&A special reflecting on the Empire series on the Ottoman world, its impact on modern Middle Eastern politics, and listener questions about figures like Gertrude Bell, Atatürk, Ottoman identity, and even turbans and furniture. The hosts argue that brief decisions, imperial map-drawing, and shifting attitudes to Islam and ethnicity still shape today’s conflicts and identities.

Main Topics: Legacy of Ottoman collapse and modern Middle East borders (Priority: 5/5): The hosts revisit how 1914–1924 transformed the Middle East, arguing that imperial decisions by figures like Lloyd George, Churchill, Sykes, and Lawrence still underpin contemporary conflicts involving Turkey, Arabs, Jews, Armenians, Kurds, and Saudis. Empire, partition, and the power of arbitrary borders (Priority: 5/5): They compare Sykes-Picot with the partition of India, emphasizing how outsiders with poor local knowledge drew borders that displaced communities and produced long-term instability. Pluralism and violence in Ottoman history (Priority: 5/5): The discussion highlights the Ottoman Empire’s religious pluralism, while also acknowledging its later decline into massacres and genocide, especially against Armenians and Christians. Gertrude Bell and the making of Iraq (Priority: 4/5): A long answer traces Bell’s life, scholarship, travel, political influence, and role in shaping postwar Iraq, while noting the moral ambiguity of British imperial policy and her own judgments. Atatürk, modernization, and Ottoman legacy (Priority: 4/5): The hosts discuss Atatürk’s rejection of Ottoman backwardness, his modernizing project, the suppression of Sufi/Ottoman culture, and the current revival of Ottoman symbolism under Erdogan. Ottoman symbols and material culture (Priority: 3/5): Listener questions about huge turbans and the ottoman as a piece of furniture lead to explanations about Ottoman visual status, funerary symbolism, and the naming of the ottoman seat from the Ottoman Empire. Turkic origins and historical migration (Priority: 3/5): The conversation explains Mahmood of Ghazni and broader Turkic movements across China, Central Asia, Persia, India, and Anatolia, stressing that “Turk” refers to shifting historical and linguistic groups rather than a simple bloodline.

Key Arguments: The 1914–1924 period was decisive in redrawing the Middle East and creating the political map still seen today. Sykes-Picot and Indian partition were similar imperial acts: outsiders with little local knowledge drew borders with lasting consequences. The Ottoman Empire was historically pluralistic in a way many Western empires were not, though that pluralism narrowed over time and ended in violence. Gertrude Bell was central to the creation of Iraq, combining scholarship, elite access, and political influence, but her legacy is inseparable from empire. Atatürk modernized Turkey by rejecting Ottoman forms, yet much of what was culturally valuable in Ottoman life was lost or suppressed. Erdogan’s Turkey has revived Ottoman imagery and political language, using imperial continuity to build nationalist legitimacy. Turkic identity is historically complex and migratory; it cannot be reduced to a single ethnicity or bloodline. Churchill and Lloyd George’s racial and imperial attitudes materially shaped policy toward Arabs, Palestinians, and Kurds.

Data Points: Ottoman heartland stability: About 400 years - The hosts describe the Ottoman heartlands as relatively stable for centuries before 1914. Transformative window: 1914 to 1924 - The decade in which the modern Middle East was largely shaped. Ottoman caliphate ended: 1924 - Referenced in relation to Abdul Majid’s departure and later Islamist nostalgia. Gertrude Bell birth year: 1868 - Used in the biography of Bell. Palestine Jewish population: 10% - The hosts note Jews were only around 10% of Palestine’s population in 1900. Quoted Churchill statement year: 1923 - Churchill’s comments on poison gas and “uncivilized tribes”. Armenian attack in Australia: 1980 - The assassination of the Turkish consul general in Sydney is cited as a late echo of genocide-era resentment. Lasting memory of Armenian activism: 1988 - The speaker recalls writing about destruction of Armenian buildings and khachkars in Turkey in 1988. Bell’s death: July 1926 - She died after a decline in health and depression; the hosts imply suicide by overdose. RAF bombing of Kurds: November 1923 - A later correction in the transcript dates the RAF bombing campaign in Iraq.

Pivotal Quotes: "I do not understand the squeamishness about the use of gas. I'm strongly in favour of using poison gas against uncivilized tribes." — Churchill (quoted by the hosts): Cited while discussing British policy toward Kurds and imperial violence. "The Ottoman Empire was pluralistic." — Speaker (hosts discussing listener questions): A core claim in the discussion of Ottoman religious and ethnic coexistence. "We have now come to the end of our Ottoman run." — Host: Opening framing for the special Q&A episode reflecting on the series.

Implications: The episode links historical empire to present-day borders, nationalism, and conflict, showing how archives, personalities, and propaganda still shape politics, memory, and identity across the Middle East and beyond.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Empire: World History

View all episodes from Empire: World History