No Stupid Questions
No Stupid Questions

75. How Do You Deal With Intrusive Thoughts?

Also: how much does confidence really matter?

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode explores intrusive thoughts—especially violent or taboo ones—as common, usually harmless mental events unless they become urges or compulsions. It then shifts to self-confidence, arguing that confidence and success can reinforce each other, with Bandura’s self-efficacy, guided mastery, and supportive feedback helping start the cycle.

Main Topics: Intrusive thoughts are common and often benign (Priority: 5/5): Angela Duckworth explains that unwanted thoughts are a normal part of human cognition, not necessarily signs of pathology, especially when they remain thoughts rather than impulses or actions. Thoughts vs. urges vs. behavior (Priority: 5/5): The discussion emphasizes a clinical distinction: having a thought like pushing someone is different from experiencing an urge to act, and mental illness concerns rise when thoughts become compulsions or behaviors. Thought suppression backfires (Priority: 5/5): Using Dan Wegner’s white bear research, the hosts show that trying not to think about something often increases its frequency, making acceptance and attention redirection more effective than suppression. Pluralistic ignorance and hidden normality (Priority: 4/5): Chris’s sense that he was alone in having these thoughts is framed as pluralistic ignorance—people wrongly assume their private experiences are unusual because they cannot see others’ inner lives. Confidence, self-efficacy, and success loops (Priority: 5/5): The second half argues that confidence is not just a feeling but a predictor of effort and persistence, and that Bandura’s self-efficacy can create virtuous or vicious cycles with performance. How confidence can be built (Priority: 4/5): The episode reviews guided mastery, mentoring, values affirmation, positive recall, and trust-based feedback as practical ways to increase confidence; it also notes that power posing has weaker evidence than originally claimed.

Key Arguments: Intrusive thoughts are universal; what matters clinically is whether they become urges, compulsions, or actions. Trying to suppress unwanted thoughts usually makes them more persistent; redirecting attention or accepting the thought is more effective. Many people misread their private thoughts as abnormal because everyone else’s inner life is hidden, a case of pluralistic ignorance. Self-efficacy is distinct from self-esteem: one is belief in one’s ability to do a task, the other is a sense of worth. Confidence can be self-reinforcing: belief in success increases effort, which increases performance, which increases confidence. Guided mastery works by breaking feared tasks into small steps and using a supportive model to build mastery gradually. Critical feedback works better when delivered in a context of high expectations and trust, as in the WISE Feedback approach. Power posing is not strongly supported in later replication work; any effects appear smaller and different from the original claims. Reflection on values or past wins can help initiate confidence, but it is not a magic fix. There is disagreement among psychologists about how much confidence affects real-world performance, though it likely matters more outside the lab.

Data Points: White bear study participants: Unspecified sample size - Dan Wegner’s experiment showed that people asked not to think of a white bear thought of it more often. Ethics-related experiment sample: 138 American adults - Study on fantasizing about violence toward a disliked person vs. neutral action. Study group size: 138 - Participants in the aggression-fantasy experiment discussed from The Atlantic. White bear study outcome: More frequent white-bear thoughts when suppression was instructed - Demonstrated paradoxical rebound effect of thought suppression. Meta-analysis timing: Just last year - Referenced synthesis on power posing effects. WISE Feedback Study population: Middle school students - Students received different kinds of essay feedback emphasizing high expectations. Guided mastery steps: 27 steps - Example of breaking a phobia treatment into manageable stages, such as with snakes.

Pivotal Quotes: "I was always looking outside myself for strength and confidence, but it comes from within. It is there all the time." — Anna Freud: Used to close the confidence discussion and support the idea that confidence can be internally cultivated. "I'm giving you this feedback because I have high expectations and I know you can achieve them." — WISE Feedback prompt: Illustrates how trust-based criticism can build confidence rather than undermine it. "I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me." — Stuart Smalley (not Stuart Varney): Referenced as a classic self-affirmation line while discussing confidence-building rituals.

Implications: For listeners, the episode normalizes intrusive thoughts and encourages acceptance over suppression. For confidence, it suggests that small wins, trusted mentors, and realistic affirmation can help start upward performance cycles, though some popular techniques remain scientifically shaky.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About No Stupid Questions

View all episodes from No Stupid Questions