80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#79 Classic episode - A.J. Jacobs on radical honesty, following the whole Bible, and reframing global problems as puzzles

Rebroadcast: this episode was originally released in June 2020. Today’s guest, New York Times bestselling author A.J. Jacobs, always hated Judge Judy. But after he found out that she was his seventh cousin, he thought, "You know what, she's not so bad". Hijacking this bias towards fam

Featured Speakers

The 80,000 Hours team Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Kieran Harris interviews A.J. Jacobs about his career of immersive self-experimentation, including radical honesty, biblical literalism, gratitude, health optimization, knowledge-seeking, and family/genetics. The conversation emphasizes how reframing problems as puzzles, using honesty and gratitude wisely, and applying effective altruism and long-termism can motivate better action while avoiding guilt and burnout.

Main Topics: AJ Jacobs’ experimental writing method: Jacobs explains why he builds books around immersive self-experiments rather than traditional reporting, using his own life as the subject and source of narrative energy. Radical honesty and social truth-telling: They discuss his radical honesty experiment, the value and limits of honesty, and how selective openness can deepen relationships without harming them. Biblical literalism, ritual, and social responsibility: Jacobs reflects on The Year of Living Biblically, its critique of fundamentalism, and what he learned about ritual, gratitude, and balancing individual rights with communal duties. Health, self-control, and future self: He reviews Drop Dead Healthy and the practical habits he kept, including skepticism toward health fads, micro-goals, and strategies for respecting one’s older self. Gratitude, effective altruism, and emotional framing: They connect Thanks a Thousand to EA ideas, arguing that gratitude can be motivating rather than complacent, and that guilt is often less useful than positive motivation. Long-termism, storytelling, and media: Jacobs endorses long-termism but says it is hard to communicate; they discuss the importance of storytelling, journalism, and media verticals that make abstract future-focused ideas vivid. Family, identity, and the global family tree: They discuss his family-tree project and how seeing humanity as interconnected can widen moral concern and increase compassion for distant others and future generations.

Key Arguments: Immersive self-experiments create compelling writing because they generate firsthand evidence, humor, and concrete lessons that abstract commentary often lacks. Radical honesty is too extreme, but more truthfulness—especially about mistakes, feelings, and social boundaries—can reduce stress and improve relationships. Biblical literalism revealed both the absurdity of selective fundamentalism and the value of ritual, social responsibility, and gratitude, even without religious belief. Health advice is mostly simple and non-novel; the best use of experimentation is finding strategies that help people actually follow basic good habits. Gratitude improves well-being and can increase motivation to help others, making it compatible with effective altruism rather than opposed to it. Guilt can be counterproductive for effective altruism because it discourages people and increases burnout; positive, empowering framing is better for sustained action. Long-termism is intuitively compelling but hard to communicate because people cannot easily picture distant future generations; stories and concrete imagery are needed. People should experiment with career paths and life habits, but not so much that they never commit; the goal is learning, not perpetual novelty. Media and journalism can distort priorities through availability bias, so EA-oriented journalism should focus on what matters most, not just what is most vivid or shocking. Seeing humanity as one family can expand moral concern; concrete visual or narrative links are more persuasive than abstract appeals.

Data Points: Number of people thanked in Thanks a Thousand: 1,000 - Jacobs thanked a thousand people involved in making his morning coffee. Years of the radical honesty experiment: a couple of months - He tried radical honesty for a limited period and found it socially difficult. Age of Encyclopædia Britannica project duration: 18 months - He spent 18 months reading the full Britannica for The Know-It-All. Size of Encyclopædia Britannica: 33,000 pages; 44 million words - Jacobs described the scale of the encyclopedia he read cover to cover. Bible verse example: 10 commandments and other Old Testament rules - He followed biblical rules literally, including beard-shaving and stoning adulterers with pebbles for safety. Coffee price example: $3 - He used a $3 coffee as an example in discussing daily spending and gratitude. Annual coffee cost example: $1,000 - He estimated that daily coffee spending could add up to roughly $1,000 per year. Health behavior threshold: 95% - He claimed 95% of health journalism/books are evidence-free or poor quality. Self-recording experiment duration: 3 months - He wore a hidden camera and recorded much of his life for about three months. Effective altruism donation example: 10% - He is a member of Giving What We Can, pledging 10% of his lifelong earnings. International jigsaw competition placement: second to last - His family placed near the bottom at the International Jigsaw Puzzle Competition in Spain.

Pivotal Quotes: "if we all think more like puzzlers, would the world be a better place?" — A.J. Jacobs: He describes the central framing device for his then-upcoming puzzle book and its relevance to social problems. "The good old days were not good." — A.J. Jacobs: He summarizes a major lesson from reading the encyclopedia and reflecting on historical progress. "The good of this conversation far outweighed the bad, at least for me." — A.J. Jacobs: His closing remark, echoing his utilitarian mindset and the interview’s tone of playful cost-benefit analysis.

Implications: For listeners, the episode argues for practical experimentation, less guilt, more gratitude, and better framing of hard problems. For EA/media, it suggests stories and emotional hooks are crucial for communicating long-term and altruistic ideas without distorting them.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About 80,000 Hours Podcast

View all episodes from 80,000 Hours Podcast