Episode Summary
Executive Summary: The episode links two major global issues: climate diplomacy and rising food prices. Adam Tooze explains how COP climate talks operate, why the Paris framework relies more on peer pressure than enforcement, and why the transition is technically and economically feasible if politics align. The second half examines the sharp rise in food prices, separating commodity benchmarks from consumer prices and showing how COVID, climate shocks, and trade disruptions are worsening hunger and political instability.
Main Topics: How COP climate conferences work: The hosts explain the structure of COP summits, from expert negotiators to ministerial-level talks, and how treaties, scientific reports, and national pledges interact in the climate regime. Climate diplomacy and geopolitical power: The discussion highlights how COP reflects both multilateral idealism and real-world power politics, including the importance of major emitters and the symbolic impact of leaders like Xi and Putin skipping Glasgow. Enforcement, peer pressure, and national law: Tooze argues that climate commitments are enforced mostly through transparency, periodic review, and domestic legal systems, especially in Europe, where Paris pledges increasingly shape constitutional and court decisions. How to think about decarbonization economically: The episode frames the climate transition through carbon pricing and a five-sector breakdown—power, transport, industry, housing, and agriculture—arguing that the challenge is politically hard but technically manageable. Measuring global food prices: The second segment clarifies that the 33% rise refers to commodity market prices, not supermarket prices, and explains how indices like the FAO Food Price Index are constructed from multiple commodities and weightings. Drivers and consequences of the food-price surge: The conversation traces food inflation to long-term demand pressures plus recent shocks from COVID, energy costs, droughts, hurricanes, labor shortages, and export disruptions, with major effects on importers and the poor. Food prices and political stability: Tooze links higher food prices to fiscal strain, subsidy cuts, protests, and broader political unrest, citing historical cases and recent demonstrations in multiple countries.
Key Arguments: COP is a massive annual negotiating forum where almost every country participates, but the real work happens through layered treaties, technical reports, national pledges, and repeated review rather than centralized coercion. The climate regime reflects an attempt to align global environmental goals with power politics; the key shift from Kyoto to Paris was getting all countries to submit nationally determined contributions rather than binding top-down targets. The main enforcement mechanism in climate policy is transparency and peer pressure, supplemented in some places by domestic law; in Europe, Paris commitments are becoming legally binding through courts and constitutional rulings. Decarbonization is hard but not impossible if treated sector by sector: electricity, transport, industry, housing, and agriculture each have identifiable pathways and major investment needs. Carbon pricing is one viable climate tool, but Tooze sees the sector-by-sector approach as more concrete and politically tractable. Food price data must be interpreted carefully because global indices track commodity/export prices, not retail checkout prices; consumer impacts are delayed and filtered through supply chains. The current food-price spike is driven by multiple overlapping shocks: energy and fertilizer costs, pandemic-era supply disruptions, hurricanes, drought, labor shortages, and demand rebounds. Food inflation redistributes income globally, benefiting exporters and hurting import-dependent regions, especially poor countries that spend large shares of foreign exchange on food. Rising food prices can trigger or intensify political unrest when governments can no longer afford subsidies or food assistance. A major structural issue is the mismatch between growing population, slowing agricultural expansion, and underinvestment in productivity, especially in India and sub-Saharan Africa.
Data Points: Countries at COP26: 195-197 - Number of UN sovereign states expected at the Glasgow climate conference Temperature goal in Paris Agreement: 1.5°C - Target for limiting global warming Current warming path: 2.7°C - Best-case projected warming if current pledges are met Official delegates at COP meetings: About 30,000 - Scale of the annual climate summit Rich-country climate finance pledge: $100 billion per year - Commitment made in 2009 for poorer countries' energy transition Actual climate finance achieved in 2020: $80 billion - Shortfall from the pledged target World economy coverage by net-zero pledges: 80% - Share of global economy now covered by net-zero commitments Global food prices year-on-year increase: 33% - FAO/UN-reported rise in September versus a year earlier US consumer inflation for food-related prices: 3.8% - Referenced as lower than producer/farm price changes US farm prices increase: 20% - Closer to commodity price trends than consumer prices FAO Food Price Index components: 95 price quotations across 24 commodities - How the global food index is built Weight of meat in food index: 33% - Largest category in the cited weighting scheme Weight of cereals in food index: 29% - Major component of the FAO index Global food import bill: $1.7 trillion - Total cross-border food spending worldwide Increase in food import bill: +$200 billion - Rise from the previous year Middle East/North Africa food dependence: About 60% of calories imported - Shows vulnerability of food-importing regions Low- and middle-income countries' food import bill: $560 billion to about $730 billion - Estimated increase in burden People facing hunger worldwide: 720 million to 811 million - UN estimate for last year and into this year People unable to afford a healthy diet: About 3 billion - Global affordability crisis beyond outright hunger Americans who lacked enough to eat in a recent week: 8.6% - Reported share of the U.S. population Number of Americans affected: 28 million - Equivalent estimate of weekly food insecurity Global population: 7.8 billion to 8.5 billion - Projected rise by 2030 U.S. food stamps coverage: 40 million people - Scale of food assistance amid rising prices Agricultural public spending target in Africa: 10% - Maputo Agreement commitment for public expenditure on agriculture Latin American cropland expansion over next decade: 5 million hectares - Expected land-use increase tied to agricultural output
Pivotal Quotes: "The point of next week's meeting seems to be to figure out how exactly to get back on track." — Cameron Abadi: Introduces COP26 as a pivotal moment for climate action "It's a kind of procedural ratchet effect." — Adam Tooze: Describes how the Paris Agreement relies on transparency, review, and pressure to raise ambition "The question is whether we'll do it." — Adam Tooze: Summarizes his view that climate solutions are technically feasible but politically uncertain
Implications: Climate progress depends less on new science than on political coordination, legal pressure, and financing. Food inflation may persist, worsening hunger and unrest, especially in import-dependent and low-income countries, unless supply chains, subsidies, and agricultural investment improve.
About Ones and Tooze
Foreign Policy economics columnist Adam Tooze, a history professor and a popular author, is encyclopedic about basically everything: from the COVID shutdown, to climate change, to pasta sauce. On our new podcast, Tooze and FP deputy editor Cameron Abadi will look at two data points each week that explain the world: one drawn from the week’s headlines and the other from just about anywhere else Tooze takes us. Check out Adam Tooze’s column at https://foreignpolicy.com/author/adam-tooze/.