Macro Musings
Macro Musings

Anat Admati on the Perils of Corporate Debt and How COVID-19 Relief Efforts Have Gone Wrong

Anat Admati is a professor of finance and economics at Stanford University, and is well-known for her work on leveraging debt in our financial system and how it makes our economy more susceptible to shocks. She's also a co-author of the popular book, *The Banker's New Clothes: What Went Wr

Featured Speakers

David Beckworth HostAnat Admati Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Anat Admati argues that the COVID-19 crisis exposed how leverage and debt amplify shocks across the economy, especially in corporate finance, banking, and debt-heavy household contracts. She criticizes tax and bankruptcy rules that subsidize borrowing, and says the policy response favored large corporations and financial markets over households and small businesses. Her preferred remedy is more equity financing, better debt design, and direct support to workers and households.

Main Topics: Leverage as a source of fragility (Priority: 5/5): Admati explains leverage through mortgages and balance sheets, showing how borrowing magnifies gains in good times but rapidly wipes out equity when asset values fall. She frames debt as a contract that becomes unstable when shocks hit. Corporate debt buildup before COVID-19 (Priority: 5/5): Compared with banks and households, the biggest pre-crisis increase in leverage came from non-financial corporations, driven by low rates and investor demand for yield. This made the corporate sector especially vulnerable once the pandemic shock arrived. Tax and bankruptcy policy as debt subsidies (Priority: 5/5): Admati argues that interest deductibility, repo safe harbors, and bankruptcy rules systematically encourage borrowing and increase fragility. She says these policies are distortions with little justification and should be reformed. Critique of Fed and Treasury crisis response (Priority: 5/5): She says pandemic support was poorly targeted and overly routed through financial markets, benefiting investors, banks, and large corporations more than workers, small firms, and households. She views the Fed’s expanding role as dangerous and opaque. Need for direct aid and income support (Priority: 4/5): Admati favors direct transfers to households through IRS and Social Security infrastructure, wage replacement, and payroll support modeled on European responses, rather than reliance on bank-mediated lending programs. Restructuring, bankruptcy, and avoiding zombie firms (Priority: 4/5): She argues that insolvent firms should be restructured through bankruptcy rather than kept alive indefinitely with cheap debt. Propping up zombies, she warns, suppresses productive investment and prolongs economic weakness. Financialization and global debt growth (Priority: 3/5): The discussion touches on the global rise in debt and financialization, but Admati rejects the idea that high leverage is inevitable. She emphasizes policy choices that could reduce debt dependence.

Key Arguments: Leverage makes economies fragile because losses are borne by a thin layer of equity, so small shocks can trigger insolvency, default, or bankruptcy. The 2008 crisis was far more damaging than the 2001 dot-com bust because it involved debt and leverage, not just equity losses. Non-financial corporations took on substantial debt before COVID-19 because low rates and tax subsidies made borrowing attractive. Banks remained highly leveraged but relatively stable; the more important recent buildup was in corporate debt rather than household debt. Interest deductibility is a major artificial subsidy to debt and has no strong social justification; removing it would reduce leverage incentives. Repo and derivative safe-harbor exemptions weaken bankruptcy discipline and encourage more fragile funding structures. The CARES Act and Fed interventions largely supported financial markets and large firms instead of directly supporting workers and small businesses. Direct household transfers and wage replacement would have been more efficient than bank-centered lending programs. Bankruptcy is a necessary restructuring tool, not a failure of policy; allowing insolvent firms to restructure is better than preserving zombies. Central bank expansion into broad asset purchases and credit allocation blurs fiscal and monetary roles and reduces accountability.

Data Points: Fed crisis lending in the last financial crisis: about $7.7 trillion - Admati cites this as the scale of undisclosed Fed support to financial institutions and central banks during the 2008 crisis. Treasury-backed Fed lending under CARES Act: $454 billion - Beckworth notes Treasury backing that allowed the Fed to lever support programs during COVID-19. Leverage ratio example in mortgage: $400,000 house with $20,000 down payment - Used to illustrate how a small equity stake magnifies both gains and losses. Down payment share: 5% - The house example shows a thin equity cushion and high leverage. Payoff on house price increase: 5% price rise could nearly double the investor’s money - Admati explains upside amplification from leverage, ignoring interest for simplicity. Small business lending program size: $349 billion - Referenced as the initial SBA lending program that was quickly exhausted. Time for SBA funds to vanish: 2 weeks - Admati says much of the initial small-business funding disappeared rapidly, largely to bigger borrowers. Lehman Brothers balance sheet size: $640 billion - She describes Lehman as a medium-sized investment bank before its bankruptcy. Countries involved in Lehman bankruptcy: at least 80 countries - Illustrates the complexity of resolving a multinational firm through bankruptcy. Corporate support leverage multiple: up to 10 times - Beckworth mentions Fed/Treasury support being levered to expand purchases and lending capacity. Academic letter signatories: over 230 academics - Admati says a letter criticizing corporate-targeted support was signed by economists, law, and finance scholars.

Pivotal Quotes: "The more leveraged you are, the more you've relied on debt, the more fragile you are." — David Beckworth: Beckworth summarizes Admati’s core point about leverage and economic vulnerability. "Stop the debt, the tax debt subsidies." — Anat Admati: Admati argues that tax policy directly encourages excessive borrowing and should be reformed. "I think it was, you know, there was few good elements in it, but I think it's poorly targeted, wasteful, and really dismaying in terms of accountability." — Anat Admati: Her judgment on the COVID relief response from Congress and the Federal Reserve.

Implications: Listeners should expect more instability when economies rely heavily on debt. Admati’s message is to reduce leverage, reform tax and bankruptcy rules, and use direct public support for people rather than propping up financial markets and zombie firms.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Macro Musings

Hosted by David Beckworth of the Mercatus Center, Macro Musings pulls back the curtain on the important macroeconomic issues of the past, present, and future.

View all episodes from Macro Musings