This Week in Startups
This Week in Startups

Anthropic seeking $5B valuation, OpenAI hires 1000 contractors, Mr. Beast’s latest video | E1668

Jason and Molly kick off the week with a generative ai update! (5:00) Then, they cover Mr. Beast’s latest video and “stunt culture” (35:21), some more third-rail topics (49:40), and Billy McFarland being back in the news! (59:50) (0:00) M+J kick off the show (2:10) Apply to Founder University 2-Day

Featured Speakers

Jason Calacanis Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode centers on a “third rail” Monday roundup: generative AI fundraising hype and product strategy, the implications of OpenAI’s coding-data efforts, Baidu’s ChatGPT clone, a debate over Mr. Beast’s blindness-cure video as both philanthropic and exploitative, then a deliberately controversial close on Project Veritas/Pfizer and Billy McFarland’s rebrand-as-consultant. The hosts repeatedly frame modern internet culture as a mix of real innovation, hype, and attention-driven extremism.

Main Topics: Generative AI fundraising bubble and Anthropic’s valuation (Priority: 5/5): The hosts discuss Anthropic’s reported $300 million raise at a $5 billion valuation, questioning the product, revenue, and whether 'safety' is substantive or mainly marketing. They compare the startup’s likely path to OpenAI-style infrastructure and eventual acquisition or platformization. OpenAI’s coding-data strategy and AI-assisted programming (Priority: 5/5): They cover reporting that OpenAI hired about 1,000 contractors, including software engineers, to label and create training data for code. The conversation argues this accelerates a loop where developers train the systems that then make them more productive, and that English/prompting may become the new programming language. China/Baidu building a ChatGPT competitor (Priority: 4/5): Baidu’s move to create a ChatGPT analogue is presented as inevitable, with concern about how authoritarian data access and algorithmic steering could be used for surveillance, radicalization detection, or political control. Mr. Beast’s blindness-surgery video and the ethics of viral philanthropy (Priority: 5/5): The hosts debate whether Mr. Beast’s video helping 1,000 people see again is heartwarming philanthropy or exploitative trauma-content. They conclude both can be true: real good is done, but the content economy pushes creators toward increasingly extreme, emotionally manipulative formats. Project Veritas, Pfizer, and trust in reporting (Priority: 4/5): A segment on a Project Veritas hidden-camera video involving a Pfizer executive turns into a broader critique of unreliable journalism tactics. The hosts emphasize that shady sourcing methods damage credibility even if some claims turn out to be true, and contrast this with mainstream reporting norms. Billy McFarland’s return as a viral-marketing consultant (Priority: 4/5): The final topic ridicules Billy McFarland’s attempt to monetize his infamy by selling consulting calls on how to make companies go viral. The hosts warn founders not to hire compromised figures simply because they have notoriety, even if they offer useful advice.

Key Arguments: Anthropic’s “safety” pitch may be more marketing than clear product differentiation; the likely commercial path is an OpenAI-like platform/API business rather than pure research. Generative AI is rapidly becoming a developer productivity tool, creating a feedback loop where humans improve the models that improve humans. A thousand contractor workers for code data-labeling suggests AI systems are being trained on software tasks in a very structured, supervised way, similar to prior ML labeling efforts. The real short-term AI risk is not sentient machines but practical harms: hallucinations, plagiarism, bias, misinformation, and inaccurate outputs in high-stakes uses. Baidu’s likely AI advantages come from data, and data-rich regimes can use AI for surveillance or political prediction in ways Western consumers may underestimate. Mr. Beast’s blindness video is simultaneously genuine philanthropy and attention-driven exploitation; the moral discomfort comes from both truths existing at once. Project Veritas-style tactics undermine trust because the audience cannot verify how much was prompted, edited, or entrapped, so even potentially true claims lose persuasive power. Hiring controversial figures like Billy McFarland can create reputational and governance risk for startups that far outweigh any short-term marketing upside.

Data Points: Anthropic reported raise: $300 million - Described as a weekend fundraising report for Anthropic Anthropic valuation: $5 billion - Reported valuation attached to the new round Anthropic prior round: $580 million - April 2022 Series B referenced in the discussion Anthropic prior valuation: $4 billion - April 2022 Series B valuation OpenAI contractors hired: about 1,000 - Reported over the weekend as remote contractors hired in the past six months OpenAI engineer share of contractors: at least 40% - Contractors reportedly creating data for software engineering tasks LinkedIn users: 875 million - Used in ad read to describe LinkedIn’s scale Founder University date: February 16th and 17th - Upcoming remote two-day workshop announcement Founder University acceptance to Launch Accelerator: 18 founders - Graduates who later entered the accelerator Mr. Beast video title scale: 1,000 blind people - Video focused on cataract surgery and restored sight Billy McFarland consulting pricing: $600 / 15 minutes, $1,000 / 30 minutes, $1,800 / hour - Rates advertised on his consulting page Cast AI average savings: over 60% - Claimed average cloud spend reduction for customers

Pivotal Quotes: ""the hottest new programming language is English"" — Andres Karpathy (cited by hosts): Referenced during the discussion of AI-assisted coding and prompt engineering ""you no longer need to click on the trending. You just pick your opinion."" — Host: Said while discussing polarized reactions to Mr. Beast and internet discourse ""I would discount the whole safety thing as marketing"" — Host: A blunt assessment of Anthropic’s positioning and the broader AI safety narrative

Implications: The episode suggests AI is moving fast from novelty to infrastructure, but hype, trust, and ethics will shape who wins. Viral creators and AI firms alike face scrutiny over exploitation, safety claims, and credibility, while founders are warned to prioritize reputation and real utility over attention spikes.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About This Week in Startups

Jason Calacanis covers startups, tech, markets, media, and all the hottest topics in business and technology. He also interviews the world’s greatest founders, operators, investors, and innovators.

View all episodes from This Week in Startups