Tech Wont Save Us
Tech Wont Save Us

Are UFOs Really Out There? w/ Kelsey Atherton

Paris Marx is joined by Kelsey Atherton to discuss the renewed interest in UFOs, where the conspiracy theories of aliens in the sky came from, and whether flying saucers might really be watching us. Kelsey Atherton is a military technology journalist. He contributes to Popular Science and has writte

Featured Speakers

Paris Marx HostParis Marks GuestKelsey Atherton Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Paris Marks interviews military tech journalist Kelsey Atherton about UFOs/UAPs, arguing that most sightings are explainable by secrecy, military testing, and sensor limitations rather than aliens. The episode traces how Cold War national security, Roswell, Area 51, and modern Pentagon transparency have sustained UFO mythology and renewed public fascination.

Main Topics: UFO vs. UAP: rebranding and terminology (Priority: 5/5): Atherton explains that UAP is largely a military rebranding of UFO, meant to sound more technical and reduce the pop-culture baggage of 'flying saucers.' Cold War secrecy and the rise of UFO mythology (Priority: 5/5): The discussion links UFO culture to postwar national security, nuclear weapons, and a permanent secrecy apparatus that encouraged speculation when the state withheld the mundane truth. Project Blue Book and military reporting systems (Priority: 4/5): They review Project Blue Book as an early military effort to collect sightings, noting many reports were explainable or actually military aircraft being observed by civilians. Roswell, Area 51, and strategic concealment (Priority: 5/5): Atherton details how Roswell and Groom Lake/Area 51 became legendary because the military initially obscured real programs like spy planes and balloon-based surveillance. Sensor error and misread data (Priority: 5/5): The episode argues many modern UAP incidents stem from sensors and cameras being used outside their intended design, plus radar filtering and calibration limits. Why UFOs remain culturally compelling (Priority: 4/5): The conversation suggests UFO stories endure because they combine technological surprise, military secrecy, and a way to think about vulnerability without directly confronting nuclear catastrophe.

Key Arguments: Most UAP talk is a rebrand of UFOs, but the new term exists to sound sober and technical rather than sensational. The military’s secrecy creates the conditions for conspiracy: if the honest explanation is withheld, the public fills the gap with aliens. Many famous sightings were actually U.S. military technology such as U-2 spy planes, the SR-71, stealth aircraft, or balloon programs. Project Blue Book showed that most sightings were explainable, and some of the remaining cases were simply people seeing classified U.S. aircraft. Roswell’s enduring myth came from the military giving a misleading first explanation and later correcting it, which made the true story easy to dismiss. Area 51 became a legend because it was genuinely secret for decades while hosting real flight testing, especially of spy planes and later stealth technology. Modern radar and infrared systems can produce misleading UAP footage because they are optimized for targeting or filtering, not for identifying unknown aerial objects. UFO narratives persist because they let people imagine technological shock and national vulnerability without immediately confronting the reality of nuclear weapons.

Data Points: UFO-to-UAP framing: UAP is described as “90% a rebranding” - Atherton characterizes the newer acronym as largely a terminological reset by the military Project Blue Book explainable cases: 90% - The University of Colorado study found about 90% of Blue Book reports could be explained Blue Book remaining unexplained, adjusted: 5% - Atherton notes that after accounting for classified U.S. aircraft, the unexplained share effectively shrinks further Area 51 origin: 1955 - The Groom Lake/Area 51 test site was established in the mid-1950s for aircraft testing Roswell incident year: 1947 - Roswell and the first flying-saucer panic are tied to the early Cold War period Blue Book declassification: 1992 - A later declassification clarified that some “mystery” sightings were actually U-2-related or other classified programs New York Times video release: 2017 - The episode points to 2017 as the moment when military UFO videos entered mainstream discussion U-2 altitude: 70,000 feet - Atherton describes the U-2 as operating at extremely high altitude with pressure suits required U-2 duration: 10 to 12 hours - Used as an example of a long-endurance spy plane tested in secret facilities Balloon tracking: A balloon could circle the world - The Bottlecap Balloon Brigade example shows how hobbyist balloons can travel globally with lightweight sensors Radar event: 2015 - A gyrocopter flew to the U.S. Capitol, illustrating radar blind spots for small, low-flying objects

Pivotal Quotes: "Because of the culture of secrecy and the military understanding of secrecy, you can't say the honest thing first, and you create this room for the mostly true thing to be completely dismissed." — Paris Marks: Opening framing of the episode’s central thesis about secrecy and conspiracy "UFOs don't exist without the post-war national security state and the totalizing consequences of nuclear weaponry." — Kate Dorsch (quoted by Atherton): Used to explain the historical conditions that produced modern UFO culture "The mystery is what was accurately captured." — Kelsey Atherton: Atherton’s argument that observers and sensors may be correct even when they are seeing classified or misunderstood phenomena

Implications: Listeners should be skeptical of sensational UFO claims and pay attention to secrecy, sensor design, and historical context. The military’s transparency problems help sustain myths, and future UAP debates will likely remain entangled with surveillance technology and classified programs.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Tech Wont Save Us

Silicon Valley wants to shape our future, but why should we let it? Every Thursday, Paris Marx is joined by a new guest to critically examine the tech industry, its big promises, and the people behind them. Tech Won’t Save Us challenges the notion that tech alone can drive our world forward by showing that separating tech from politics has consequences for us all, especially the most vulnerable. It’s not your usual tech podcast.

View all episodes from Tech Wont Save Us