Freakonomics Radio
Freakonomics Radio

Are You Ready for a Fresh Start? (Ep. 455 Replay)

Behavioral scientists have been exploring if — and when — a psychological reset can lead to lasting change. We survey evidence from the London Underground, Major League Baseball, and New Year’s resolutions; we look at accidental fresh starts, forced fresh starts, and fresh starts that backfire. And

Featured Speakers

Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: This episode explores the “fresh start effect”: how temporal or situational milestones—New Year’s Day, birthdays, Mondays, new jobs, moves, or disruptions—can motivate behavior change, but rarely guarantee it sticks. Drawing on research and real-world examples, it argues fresh starts can help people reset habits, yet success depends on follow-through, flexibility, and context.

Main Topics: The fresh start effect and why milestones motivate change (Priority: 5/5): Katie Milkman explains that beginnings like Jan. 1, birthdays, Mondays, and new environments create psychological breaks that make goals feel attainable and encourage people to act. New Year’s resolutions: hope, optimism, and mixed results (Priority: 5/5): Listener resolutions and cited studies show people often want behavior change, but measured success rates vary widely and self-report data can overstate real progress. Fresh starts as opportunities, not guarantees (Priority: 5/5): Research shows fresh starts can prompt goal-setting, but lasting change requires more than motivation; habits often fail without additional tools and structure. Natural experiments in commuting, sports, and work (Priority: 4/5): Examples from London transit disruptions, job changes, and baseball trades illustrate how forced resets can improve outcomes for some and disrupt others. COVID-19 as an unintended reset (Priority: 4/5): The pandemic broke routines worldwide, creating both hardship and unexpected opportunities to rebuild habits, work patterns, and daily life. Behavior change works best with flexibility and commitment devices (Priority: 4/5): Milkman argues that successful change often relies on flexible routines, fallback plans, and commitment devices rather than rigid schedules alone. When resets help versus hurt (Priority: 4/5): Research on baseball players suggests resets can aid those struggling, but may harm high performers who lose momentum or routine.

Key Arguments: Fresh starts are real psychological triggers that increase motivation because they signal a new beginning and encourage big-picture thinking. The fresh start effect is useful for starting goals, but it is not sufficient for sustaining behavior change over time. Self-reported New Year’s resolution success rates can be misleading; objective success may be much lower than some studies suggest. Disruptions can work like forced fresh starts, leading some people to discover better habits or routes they continue using. The effect of a reset depends on prior performance: people struggling may benefit, while those doing well may experience interruption and decline. Flexible systems and commitment devices may produce better long-term behavior change than rigid routines. Large disruptions like COVID can break old habits and create a need for new ones, but also make behavior change more difficult overall.

Data Points: Americans making New Year’s resolutions: roughly 50% - Milkman says about half of Americans make resolutions each year Reported New Year’s resolution success rate: 55% - A Stockholm University study by Per Karlbring and coauthors Other reported resolution success rate: as low as 8% - Milkman cites other studies as closer to reality Fresh-start commuter behavior change: about 5% - London Underground strike study by Ferdinand Rauch and colleagues University retirement-savings study sample: more than 8,000 people - Milkman’s randomized mailer experiment New York City subway on-time performance: 58% to 80% - Andy Byford oversaw improvement after launching Fast Forward MTA rehab plan cost: $40 billion - Andy Byford’s subway modernization proposal Tube ridership during COVID: around 20% of normal; at one point 5% - Andy Byford describes Transport for London ridership collapse Baseball reset study sample: about 700 trades and 250,000 at-bats - Hengchen Dai’s analysis of MLB trades from 1975 to 2014 Behavior change intervention effect: wiped away at Thanksgiving break - Milkman describes how a positive exercise intervention disappeared after disruption

Pivotal Quotes: "This is all a mind game." — Katie Milkman: Milkman explains that fresh starts can be intentionally leveraged to motivate change "Fresh starts are like that, too. Like life is a mess." — Katie Milkman: She contrasts flexible change strategies with rigid routines "There's always opportunity in adversity." — Andy Byford: Byford frames COVID-era disruption as a chance to rethink transport systems and leadership

Implications: Listeners should use milestones and disruptions as launch points, but pair them with concrete systems—commitment devices, flexible routines, and realistic goals—to make change last. For organizations, resets can reveal new possibilities, but outcomes depend on timing and context.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Freakonomics Radio

Freakonomics co-author Stephen J. Dubner uncovers the hidden side of everything. Why is it safer to fly in an airplane than drive a car? How do we decide whom to marry? Why is the media so full of bad news? Also: things you never knew you wanted to know about wolves, bananas, pollution, search engines, and the quirks of human behavior. To get every show in the Freakonomics Radio Network without ads and a monthly bonus episode of Freakonomics Radio, start a free trial for SiriusXM Podcasts+ on...

View all episodes from Freakonomics Radio