The Flip Side
The Flip Side

As the private credit market grows will the risks increase?

Given the rapid growth of the private credit market, Research analysts Jeff Meli and Brad Rogoff debate the tradeoffs issuers and investors may face and whether the benefits outweigh the risks for both - and the wider economy.

Featured Speakers

Barclays Investment Bank HostBrad Rogoff GuestJeff Melley Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Barclays analysts debate private credit’s rapid rise as a non-bank lending alternative to public debt markets. Brad Rogoff argues it offers investors higher yields, lower reported volatility, and issuers speed, certainty, and flexible leverage. Jeff Melley counters that growth reflects regulation-driven risk migration and may increase systemic vulnerability as rates rise and leverage bites.

Main Topics: What private credit is and why it has grown (Priority: 5/5): The episode defines private credit as non-public, direct non-bank lending and frames it as an alternative to corporate bonds and institutional loans. Growth accelerated after the global financial crisis when banks pulled back from lending to smaller firms, and the market has since broadened to larger issuers and new investor types. Investor appeal: yield, lower mark-to-market volatility, and portfolio fit (Priority: 5/5): Brad argues investors are attracted by higher spreads versus public credit, less visible volatility because assets are not actively traded, and a useful diversification/return enhancement role despite lower liquidity. Issuer appeal: speed, certainty, and access to capital (Priority: 4/5): Private credit is presented as attractive to borrowers because it can be executed quickly with fewer lenders, offers financing to companies with limited public market access, and can be tailored for sponsor-backed or smaller firms. Leverage as a key differentiator and concern (Priority: 5/5): Jeff emphasizes that private credit enables higher leverage than bank-regulated channels, potentially above 7x-8x EBITDA, and warns this may amplify downturn risk. Brad responds that leverage has a price and covenant protections can offset some risk. Covenants, structure, and underwriting quality (Priority: 4/5): The discussion contrasts generally stronger covenant packages in private credit with covenant-light broadly syndicated loans, while noting some recent slippage as sponsors push for more flexibility. Both acknowledge that deal structure matters materially. Regulation, migration of risk, and macroprudential concerns (Priority: 5/5): Jeff argues that bank rules and other public-company burdens are pushing risk into less regulated private markets, reducing policymakers’ ability to monitor or mitigate systemwide leverage and disclosure risks. Rates, reach for yield, and forward risk (Priority: 4/5): With floating-rate loans and rising Fed rates, both agree borrowers will face higher interest burdens. The debate centers on whether the asset class can withstand tighter monetary conditions after years of cheap funding.

Key Arguments: Private credit grew because banks retreated after the GFC, leaving a financing gap for small and medium-sized companies. Investors are drawn to private credit because it can deliver roughly 100-200+ bps of extra yield versus comparable public credit, alongside lower reported volatility due to infrequent marking. Borrowers accept higher cost because they gain speed, certainty of execution, and access to financing that may be difficult or costly in public markets. The market has expanded beyond small firms into larger $3 billion-style deals, which suggests private credit is increasingly competing with traditional leveraged loans. Higher leverage is a central issuer attraction: private credit can support leverage above bank-guideline thresholds that public channels often avoid. Covenants are generally stronger in private credit than in broadly syndicated loans, which may partially compensate for higher leverage. Jeff argues the migration of leveraged lending into private markets weakens regulatory oversight and may create systemic economic risk in a recession. Brad argues private credit reflects a rational response to regulatory burdens and a legitimate private-market price for liquidity, leverage, and speed. Rising rates will pressure cash flows because private credit loans are floating rate, potentially exposing overlevered borrowers. The growth of private assets may persist because public-company disclosure and regulatory costs keep rising, not just because of current market conditions.

Data Points: Estimated market size: $2 trillion - Brad says private credit is currently around this size, roughly comparable to leveraged loans and approaching high-yield bonds. Private credit share of market: 1.5% - Jeff references an estimate that the market is about 1.5% (as stated in the transcript) and rapidly expanding. Yield pickup over public credit: More than 200 bps historically; closer to 100 bps now - Brad estimates private credit offered this spread advantage on a like-for-like basis for an extended period. BDC share of market: About 20% - Brad notes business development companies remain important but have been eclipsed by other vehicles. Leverage guideline threshold: 6x debt/EBITDA - Jeff cites the Fed’s leverage lending guideline cap used as a benchmark for bank-originated loans. High-leverage deals: Over 7x or 8x EBITDA - Jeff says the share of deals above these levels has been growing in private credit. Large private credit deal size: $3 billion - Brad cites recent deals of this magnitude as evidence that larger issuers are entering the market. Broadly syndicated leveraged loan market held by private investors: Approximately two-thirds private - Brad argues that private capital already dominates much of the leveraged loan market. High-yield bond issuers that are private: About one-third - Brad uses this to argue that private markets are already deeply embedded in credit financing. Inflation referenced: 8% - Jeff mentions inflation reaching 8% while rates had only just begun to rise.

Pivotal Quotes: "Private credit does not trade actively, and so it doesn't get marked to market, i.e. , it has much lower volatility." — Brad Rogoff: Brad explains why investors may prefer private credit despite similar default risk to public credit. "The growth of private credit also shows, I think, the downside of trying to use banking regulations to affect the broader financial system." — Jeff Melley: Jeff argues that risk is migrating outside the regulated banking system, reducing policymakers’ control. "If I had to guess, some of the covenant slippage will reverse with the recent surge in volatility." — Brad Rogoff: Brad acknowledges some weakening in private credit terms but expects tighter markets to restore discipline.

Implications: Private credit is likely to keep growing as long as investors seek yield and borrowers want flexible capital, but rising rates and higher leverage could reveal hidden risks. The episode suggests regulators may need new tools as activity migrates outside public markets.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About The Flip Side

This podcast series features a lively debate between two of Barclays’ Research analysts taking opposing viewpoints on timely topics of importance to economies and businesses around the globe. By hearing arguments and insights on both sides, we hope you will come away with a greater understanding of the economic implications of sometimes polarizing issues. For more insights from our experts: https://www.ib.barclays Important content disclosures: https://www.ib.barclays/disclosures/important-co...

View all episodes from The Flip Side