Masters in Business
Masters in Business

At the Money: Why Fees Really Matter

Fees matter more than you think. Over the long term, the difference between a few basis points can turn into real, big money. On this episode, Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst Eric Balchunas joins Barry Ritholtz to discuss how fees can significantly impact your portfolio. See omnystudio.com/listen

Featured Speakers

Bloomberg HostBarry Ritholtz Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: This podcast episode from 'At the Money' features Barry Ritholtz and Eric Balchumis discussing the relentless decline of ETF fees, driven by Vanguard's influence, which has saved investors trillions. They explore how fees have dropped to near zero, the importance of brand trust, and the profound impact of compounding returns, emphasizing that low fees significantly boost long-term investment performance.

Main Topics: The Great Cost Migration (Priority: 5/5): The historical trend of declining ETF fees, driven by Vanguard and competition, leading to near-zero fee products and massive investor savings. Impact of Compounding Returns (Priority: 5/5): How even small fee differences (e.g., 2% vs 0%) dramatically affect long-term investment growth, illustrated with examples over decades. Brand Trust in ETF Selection (Priority: 4/5): The importance of brand reputation alongside low fees; advisors prioritize fee first, then brand, making established names like Vanguard and BlackRock dominant. ETF vs Mutual Fund Structure (Priority: 4/5): ETFs are more efficient, tax-friendly, and flexible than mutual funds, likened to MP3s vs CDs, making them the preferred vehicle for modern investing. The Vanguard Effect (Priority: 4/5): Vanguard's fee pressure, initiated by John Bogle, has saved investors an estimated trillion dollars, with ongoing annual savings of $150 billion. Zero-Fee ETFs and Market Perception (Priority: 3/5): While zero-fee ETFs exist, they are often seen as gimmicks unless backed by a trusted brand; fees below 5 basis points are considered effectively free.

Key Arguments: Cutting fees consistently attracts investor flows, making it a winning strategy for ETF issuers. The difference between paying 80 basis points vs 8 basis points is major, but below 5 basis points, the impact is less consequential. Brand trust is critical; low fees alone are insufficient without a reputable brand, as seen with lesser-known issuers failing to attract assets. ETFs are superior to mutual funds due to lower costs, tax efficiency, and intraday trading, driving their adoption as the 21st-century investment vehicle. The compounding effect means that over 30-50 years, fee differences can reduce total returns by 30-60%, emphasizing the importance of low costs.

Data Points: Average mutual fund fee (asset-weighted): 65 basis points - Compared to Vanguard's asset-weighted average of 9 basis points, highlighting savings. Vanguard's first index fund fee: 66 basis points - Initial fee when launched, later reduced over time. Investor savings from Vanguard effect: $1 trillion total, growing by $150 billion annually - Estimated savings from fee pressure initiated by Vanguard. Growth of $10,000 over 50 years at 8% vs 6%: $360,000 vs $170,000 - Illustrates the impact of 2% fee differential on compounding returns. Fee differential impact on $1 million over 30 years: 30% difference in final amount - Shows significant long-term effect of fee differences. Current zero-fee ETFs: A couple exist from less popular companies - Indicates that zero fees are possible but not yet mainstream.

Pivotal Quotes: "I call it the great cost migration. I call it the fee wars. This is why I call the ETF industry the Terradome because it is brutal if you're an issuer. Everybody's cutting fees all the time. But the thing is, it works. Cutting fees almost is like batting a thousand. And if you do that, the flows will come." — Eric Balchumis: Describing the competitive nature of the ETF industry and the effectiveness of fee cuts. "So if you put $10,000 into the three basis point ETF, it would be three bucks a year. That's crazy. It is crazy. It's a beautiful thing. It's free." — Barry Ritholtz: Highlighting how low fees have become, making investing nearly cost-free. "The no fees, you get something like $360,000. The 6% compounding only gives you like $170,000. Almost double. Basically, double." — Eric Balchumis: Explaining the dramatic impact of fee differences on long-term investment growth.

Implications: For investors, the relentless fee decline means prioritizing low-cost ETFs from trusted brands can significantly boost long-term returns. The trend pressures asset managers to innovate or consolidate, while investors benefit from near-zero costs, making passive investing increasingly attractive and accessible.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Masters in Business

Barry Ritholtz speaks with the people that shape markets, investing and business.

View all episodes from Masters in Business