Big Technology Podcast
Big Technology Podcast

Brain Computer Interface Frontier: Movement, Coma, Depression, AI Merge

Dr. Ben Rapoport and Michael Mager are the co-founders of Precision Neuroscience, a company building a minimally invasive, high-resolution brain-computer interface. The two join Big Technology to discuss the modern day applications of BCIs and frontiers of the technology, including computer control,

Featured Speakers

Alex Kantrowitz HostMichael Major Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Precision Neuroscience’s founders argue that brain-computer interfaces are moving from science fiction to clinical reality, with a non-damaging, high-density surface electrode system already FDA-cleared and entering longer-term trials. They say the technology could first transform paralysis, then expand to stroke, disorders of consciousness, depression, and potentially new AI/neuroscience insights, while raising major questions about privacy, security, and consciousness.

Main Topics: Precision’s non-invasive BCI architecture: The company’s device uses an ultra-thin surface array with 1,024 electrodes that sits on the cortex without puncturing tissue, distinguishing it from penetrating systems and enabling reversible, high-resolution recording. Clinical path from paralysis to broader medical uses: The founders frame paralysis as the first major market, but say the platform can extend to stroke, speech/motor deficits, depression, and disorders of consciousness as the data and regulatory path mature. Why surface cortical signals are enough: Ben Rapaport argues most conscious interaction with the world is represented at the cortical surface, so high-density surface recording can achieve high-fidelity decoding without deep-brain penetration. BCI as an AI/data platform: They emphasize that structured, high-resolution neural data can be compressed and learned across patients, making BCI a potential foundation for machine-learning applications and future neural 'APIs.' Memory, decision-making, and consciousness: The interview explores whether BCIs can decode decisions, retrieve memories, or identify consciousness in coma-like states. The founders are more confident about decisions and communication than full memory extraction. Safety, regulation, and privacy: They stress phased clinical development, FDA clearance, and active work on neural data privacy and security through a collaborative community involving regulators, clinicians, patients, and industry. Future merger of brain and AI: The conversation ends on whether BCIs and AI could merge and whether AI could be conscious. The founders see BCIs as the first practical bridge toward tighter human-AI integration.

Key Arguments: A high-density surface array can decode useful brain signals without damaging neural tissue, contradicting the old dogma that penetrating electrodes are required. Most voluntary interaction with computers and the world is mediated by surface cortical regions, especially motor and sensory areas, so a compact implant can provide substantial functionality. More electrodes and a regular lattice structure improve bandwidth, reliability, and cross-patient learning, making the system more scalable than irregular penetrating arrays. BCIs are moving from laboratory science into clinical medicine, with real therapeutic use for paralysis now and expanded indications such as stroke likely next. The data produced by BCIs may function like a neural API, enabling partner devices and software to build additional therapies and applications on top of decoded brain signals. Decision-making may be decodable sooner than memory, because decisions have clearer neural correlates; memory retrieval appears to require network stimulation rather than direct readout. Disorders of consciousness may be diagnosable and partially communicable with BCI tools, especially in minimally conscious patients who are mistaken for coma. Neural data privacy and security must be addressed early, and the FDA/regulatory ecosystem is already shaping standards for responsible deployment.

Data Points: Company founding year: 2021 - Precision Neuroscience was described as having started in 2021. Total funding raised: $155 million - The company’s reported cumulative funding amount. Series C closing date: December 2024 - Precision closed its Series C in December 2024. Headcount: 85 people - Approximate size of the Precision team. Implants completed: 40 implants - Michael Major said Precision has completed 40 implants, more than the rest of the industry combined in the prior two years. Electrodes per module: 1,024 electrodes - The described Precision electrode array contains 1,024 tiny platinum electrodes. Electrode diameter: 50 microns - Most electrodes are said to be about the size of a neuron. Simultaneous modules used: Up to 4 modules - They said they have deployed as many as four arrays at once in one patient. Total electrodes in one case: 4,096 electrodes - Four modules simultaneously yielded 4,096 surface electrodes. Temporary implant duration: Up to 30 days - The next clinical phase will allow the device to remain implanted for up to 30 days. FDA status: First modern BCI company with FDA clearance - They claimed Precision is the only current leading BCI company with full FDA clearance. Market size estimate for severe paralysis: About $2.5 billion per year - Major estimated the initial market from severe paralysis use cases. Potential broader market expansion: 10 to 15 times larger - They estimated the market could expand well beyond the initial paralysis segment. Morgan Stanley TAM estimate: $400 billion - A Morgan Stanley report was cited as estimating a total addressable market of $400 billion. US stroke incidence: Almost 1 million per year - They cited annual stroke incidence in the United States. Stroke patients with persistent deficits: Several hundred thousand / about one-third - They said about one-third of stroke patients recover with lasting motor or speech impairment. People with no use of arms and hands: About 400,000 - Estimated size of the most severely paralyzed initial population. Signal latency for current BCI-to-digital control: Single-digit milliseconds - They said the interface latency is in the single-digit millisecond range. Human brain-to-hand latency: Around 25 milliseconds - They contrasted BCI latency with the natural latency of thinking then typing through the hand. Preliminary prevalence of covert consciousness: Maybe 15% or more in some cases - They said some patients who appear comatose may retain some ability to think or modulate neural activity.

Pivotal Quotes: "Safety and performance are not in opposition. They are actually self-reinforcing." — Michael Major: Explaining Precision’s philosophy for using a non-damaging surface implant rather than penetrating electrodes. "The brain is definitely not just electrical, but thinking of it as an electrical system helps us to interface with it and in some ways to heal the brain when it is injured." — Ben Rapaport: Clarifying how the company conceptualizes the brain for BCI design. "The way the brain stores memory is very different from the way we think of memory being stored in the digital world." — Ben Rapaport: Answering questions about whether BCIs could someday download or directly retrieve memories.

Implications: BCIs are nearing real medical adoption, starting with paralysis and expanding into stroke and consciousness disorders. If the platform scales, it could reshape neurorehabilitation, neural privacy policy, and the future human-AI interface.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Big Technology Podcast

The Big Technology Podcast takes you behind the scenes in the tech world featuring interviews with plugged-in insiders and outside agitators. Alex Kantrowitz, a Silicon Valley journalist who's interviewed the world's top tech CEOs — from Mark Zuckerberg to Larry Ellison — is the host.

View all episodes from Big Technology Podcast