Goldman Sachs Exchanges
Goldman Sachs Exchanges

Bright Spots in Emerging Markets

A better external backdrop is just part of the reason why emerging market assets have surprised in the first half of 2016. Kamakshya Trivedi, chief Emerging Markets macro strategist in Goldman Sachs Research, considers the local and global factors influencing asset prices in developing economies aro

Featured Speakers

Goldman Sachs Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The podcast argues that the 2016 emerging-market rally was driven by a favorable mix of external catalysts—less fear of a China devaluation, a more dovish Fed, and higher oil prices—plus improving EM fundamentals and cheaper valuations. Looking ahead, China’s deleveraging, Brazil’s policy reset, India’s reform trajectory, commodity divergences, and debt risks are the main forces shaping EM growth and asset performance.

Main Topics: Drivers of the Emerging Market Rally (Priority: 5/5): KT explains that EM assets benefited from a rare combination of better global conditions and stronger local fundamentals: China fears eased, the Fed turned more dovish, oil rebounded, current accounts improved, and EM currencies looked cheap after years of depreciation. China: Policy, Currency, and Deleveraging Risk (Priority: 5/5): China is identified as the most consequential medium-term factor for EMs. The discussion focuses on the likelihood of another abrupt devaluation, the shift to a trade-weighted currency framework, and the difficulty of sustaining growth while deleveraging. Brazil’s Recovery and Political Shift (Priority: 4/5): Brazil’s strong equity and currency performance is attributed to improved external balances, deep prior depreciation, higher rates, and changing political expectations. The outlook is cautiously positive, but the currency may already be too strong. India’s Reform and Growth Outlook (Priority: 4/5): India remains a relative bright spot, supported by monetary stability and reform momentum under Modi. Investors are watching whether the central bank framework remains intact and whether recent reforms translate into sustained progress. Commodity Price Divergence and Oil Exporters (Priority: 4/5): Oil-exporting EMs are absorbing pain either through currency depreciation or fiscal deterioration, while metals exporters may face longer-lasting pressure because of weaker Chinese demand and oversupply. Debt, Reserves, and Financial Stability in EMs (Priority: 4/5): The panel downplays systemic sovereign-default risk because reserves are stronger and external debt is lower than in past crises, but notes corporate external debt and domestic leverage as potential pockets of distress. Valuations, Inflation, and Investor Interest (Priority: 3/5): The conversation highlights that EM valuations became more attractive after years of currency weakness, while inflation conditions vary sharply across EMs, creating different policy challenges and investment opportunities.

Key Arguments: EM performance was helped by a 'cocktail' of favorable external factors, but internal improvements in current accounts and valuations were equally important. China’s abrupt devaluation risk is lower than last summer because policymakers have learned the importance of signaling and using a credible policy framework. Despite lower CNY devaluation risk, gradual CNY weakness is still likely and may be necessary for easier financial conditions during deleveraging. China’s 6.5%–7% growth target is overly ambitious and may undermine reform by pushing policymakers back toward credit stimulus. Brazil’s current account and currency adjustment improved competitiveness; the country now needs a relatively stable, not overvalued, currency to preserve progress. India’s outlook depends on preserving monetary stability and building on new reforms rather than relying only on political optimism. Oil exporters have no way to avoid adjustment after the oil shock; they can only choose whether the pain comes through the currency or the fiscal budget. The bar for sovereign default across major EMs is high because reserves are strong and external debt is relatively low. The main debt risk in EMs is more likely to appear in corporate balance sheets and local banking systems than as a sovereign crisis. A sharp dollar rebound would tighten EM financial conditions and could hurt growth, since EM fundamentals still lack a broad-based strong growth story.

Data Points: Key external shocks/remedies in EM rally: 3 - China fear abated, Fed turned dovish, and oil rose roughly $20 per barrel from the lows. Oil price move: about $20 a barrel higher - Used to explain why energy-linked and broader EM sentiment improved. Current account deficit in Brazil: about 5% of GDP to less than 2% - Illustrates Brazil’s external rebalancing and improved sustainability. China growth target: 6.5% to 7% - Described as too ambitious relative to potential growth and reform needs. Timing reference: March FOMC - Fed dovishness became most pronounced around the March 2016 meeting. Podcast recording date: May 17, 2016 - Stated in the closing disclaimer. India reform/policy window: two-year anniversary of PM Modi’s coming into office - Frames discussion of India’s progress and investor expectations. Oil shock context: oil prices halved - Used to describe the terms-of-trade hit to oil-exporting EMs. Brazil currency condition: deep depreciation of the real - Helped improve competitiveness and narrow the current account deficit. China policy shift: December - Policy moved toward a trade-weighted currency index benchmark in December.

Pivotal Quotes: "I think if you look at the past three to four months, I think you've had a cocktail of circumstances which have been unusually friendly to emerging market assets." — Kamaksha Trivedi: Explaining the main drivers behind the EM rally. "The most consequential factor in any sort of medium term for emerging markets is the trajectory of China." — Kamaksha Trivedi: Prioritizing China as the key medium-term variable for EM growth and markets. "I think the 6.5% to 7% growth rate ... is actually part of the problem, because I think it is too high relative to our estimates of what potential growth is." — Kamaksha Trivedi: Critiquing China’s growth target and its effects on reform incentives.

Implications: Investors should treat the EM rally as partly cyclical and sentiment-driven, not purely structural. China’s policy path, Fed/dollar moves, and commodity trends will dominate returns, while country-specific opportunities remain in Brazil, India, Russia, and reforming markets like Indonesia and Argentina.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Goldman Sachs Exchanges

In each episode of "Exchanges," people from the firm share their insights on developments shaping industries, markets and the global economy.

View all episodes from Goldman Sachs Exchanges