Intelligence Squared
Intelligence Squared

Can We Make the Internet Safe for Children? With Baroness Beeban Kidron

Filmmaker and activist Baroness Beeban Kidron has been warning of the digital dangers facing young people for over a decade, and has played a central role in establishing standards for online safety and privacy across the world. In this episode, she talks to Carl Miller about the technologies design

Featured Speakers

Baroness Biban Kidron Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Baroness Biban Kidron argues that digital platforms were built to capture attention, exploit children’s vulnerabilities, and reshape childhood, while governments and lobbyists enabled this through complacency and capture. She says the solution is democratic accountability: stronger regulation, less toxic product design, and treating tech like any other product affecting public health and child welfare.

Main Topics: Childhood displaced by digital design (Priority: 5/5): Kidron argues that children were placed onto platforms that were not built to protect them, and that online life has effectively reshaped childhood rather than merely supplementing it. Attention capture and addictive design (Priority: 5/5): The conversation focuses on persuasive tech, reward loops, dopamine-driven engagement, and deliberate product choices that keep users, especially children, compulsively online. Algorithms and escalation of harm (Priority: 5/5): Kidron explains that algorithmic recommendation systems amplify interests into extremes, exposing children to pornography, self-harm, extremist content, and other harmful material. Political capture and lobbying (Priority: 5/5): A major theme is that governments have been too close to tech firms, with lobbying, money, and revolving-door relationships weakening democratic oversight. Children’s voices and desired reforms (Priority: 4/5): Kidron emphasizes that young people want kinder, less addictive platforms, more offline alternatives, and adults to model healthier phone use. Regulation, Ofcom, and the path forward (Priority: 4/5): The discussion assesses current regulation, especially Ofcom, and argues for stronger enforcement powers, complaint routes, and treating tech as a regulated product rather than an exceptional category.

Key Arguments: Technology itself is not the fundamental problem; the problem is what companies and governments have allowed technology to become through commercial incentives and weak accountability. Social media and digital services are designed to maximize time spent online, converting attention into profit and reducing user agency. Children are uniquely exposed because they have less experience, less power, and are treated by platforms as if they were adults, despite having very different developmental needs. Persuasive design uses reward cycles, notifications, social cues, and variable reinforcement to create dependency and habitual checking. Algorithms do not merely reflect preferences; they intensify them, pushing users from mild interests toward more extreme, harmful, or exploitative material. Many governments have been effectively captured by tech lobbying, making meaningful regulation slow, timid, and compromised. Current online safety regulation is an improvement, but enforcement is still too weak, too slow, and too reliant on voluntary compliance from companies. Children want online spaces that are less toxic and more neutral, plus real-world alternatives like playgrounds, youth clubs, and adults who are not constantly on their phones. The broader policy lesson is to treat tech like any other powerful product—similar to cars, drugs, food, or school interventions—subject to testing, limits, and public accountability.

Data Points: Children who see pornography without searching: 60% - Kidron cites research to show how algorithmic feeds expose children to harmful sexual content. Children who have seen beheadings online: around 50% - Used to illustrate the scale of graphic violence accessible to minors. UK politicians on oversight committees with tech money: 96% - Kidron cites this as evidence of political capture and compromised oversight. Estimate of time spent understanding the issue: 10,000 hours - Kidron says she needed long experience to fully understand the digital harms landscape. Years of public concern and research: roughly a decade and a half - Describes how long she and others have been warning about these issues. Age threshold referenced for harmful content protections: under 18 - She says it should already be illegal for minors under 18 to be sent pornography, self-harm, pro-suicide, and extreme diet content. Number of rules for a flourishing world: 12 - Kidron says her book sets out 12 rules for a better digital future. Public consultation response size: 70,000 people - Mentioned to argue that government consultations are slow and may not change policy.

Pivotal Quotes: "technology is not the problem. In fact, you know, the tragedy is not what technology can do, but what we've allowed it to become" — Baroness Biban Kidron: Summarizing her core thesis about design, incentives, and governance "Who thinks it is okay to design a child to obey or to need a reward or to pay attention at all times of day or night" — Baroness Biban Kidron: Explaining why attention-engineered systems are especially harmful for children "this is an engineered environment" — Baroness Biban Kidron: Her closing point that digital spaces are deliberately built and can therefore be redesigned democratically

Implications: Listeners are urged to demand stronger child protection, support real regulation, and treat digital platforms as engineered systems that can be redesigned. The episode suggests the future of AI and social media will depend on whether democracies act before tech companies further entrench their power.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Intelligence Squared

View all episodes from Intelligence Squared