EconTalk
EconTalk

Chris Blattman on Sweatshops

If you were a poor person in a poor country, would you prefer steady work in a factory or to be your own boss, buying and selling in the local market? Economist Chris Blattman of the University of Chicago talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about experimental evidence on how poor people choose in

Featured Speakers

Library of Economics and Liberty HostChris Blattman Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Russ Roberts and Chris Blattman discuss whether factories (“sweatshops”) or informal self-employment are better for the poor in very low-income countries. Using randomized hiring in Ethiopian factories, Blattman finds factory jobs were often unattractive, short-lived, and associated with more health problems, while rejected workers did fairly well with a $300 grant and business training. The episode emphasizes local labor-market reality, not ideology, as the key to evaluating aid and development.

Main Topics: Why development programs favor self-employment (Priority: 5/5): Blattman explains that many anti-poverty programs try to raise productivity of poor self-employed workers by giving cash, livestock, skills, or equipment because firms are scarce and many people rely on micro-enterprises or farms. Aid infrastructure and cash transfers (Priority: 4/5): Roberts and Blattman discuss how aid is actually delivered, including direct cash on ATM cards for refugees and large government-led grant programs funded by subsidized World Bank credit. Factories vs. informal work as paths out of poverty (Priority: 5/5): The core research question is whether formal factory work is better than informal work. Blattman initially expected factory jobs to offer stability, skill-building, and higher future wages. Ethiopia’s industrialization and management constraints (Priority: 4/5): The conversation turns to Ethiopia’s emerging manufacturing sector, foreign and domestic investment, and the importance of middle managers, HR, and logistics as hidden bottlenecks to industrial growth. Study design: randomized job offers and controls (Priority: 5/5): Blattman describes a field experiment in which qualified applicants were randomized into factory jobs, a $300-plus-training entrepreneurship intervention, or a no-treatment control group. Unexpected findings on health and turnover (Priority: 5/5): Results showed high quit rates, limited long-term attachment to factories, and a doubling of self-reported health problems among those offered factory work compared with controls. What the study implies about development and growth (Priority: 4/5): The discussion concludes that poverty alleviation and economic growth are different goals: small gains from cash or jobs can matter greatly for individuals, but industrialization and market size are what transform economies.

Key Arguments: Many poor people are already self-employed because firms are scarce, so development programs often try to boost productivity through cash, assets, or skills rather than waiting for formal jobs. Randomized evaluations suggest giving poor people capital can raise earnings meaningfully, even if only from very low levels; this is a strong poverty-alleviation tool. Factory jobs are not automatically better than informal work; in the Ethiopian study, many workers quit quickly and their outside options in informal work were better than expected. Factory work may impose real health costs through chemicals, dust, repetitive labor, and other workplace conditions, even when the plant appears orderly and supervised. Industrialization can still matter greatly for growth, because productive firms generate a disproportionate share of output and enable broader specialization and trade. Management capacity—especially middle management, HR, and operations—is a major hidden constraint on factory growth in low-income countries. Aid can be highly effective when it is simple and well-targeted, but it is more reliably transformative for subsistence and risk reduction than for structural economic transformation.

Data Points: Date of episode: November 16, 2016 - Opening metadata for the EconTalk episode World Bank-backed Ugandan program: $300 million - Government cash-transfer/business-support program described by Blattman Initial factory applicants who met qualifications: About 150 out of 300 - Typical applicant pool at a factory with 300 applicants and 50 openings Factory jobs offered in a cohort: 50 jobs - Randomized hiring among qualified applicants Entrepreneurship treatment size: $300 plus about five days of business planning/consulting - Intervention for rejected applicants Share of treatment participants still in a factory after a year: Roughly 100 out of 300 (~33%) - Approximate number of workers still in any factory job after initial factory offer Share of control participants who found factory work elsewhere: About 20% - Workers who did not get the focal factory job but later found factory jobs elsewhere Increase in factory-job retention probability: About 12 percentage points - Difference in being in a factory job at year-end between offered-job and control groups Average time in a factory among offered workers: About 20 weeks - Average exposure due to partial retention and turnover Average time in a factory among control workers: About 10 weeks - Control group factory exposure during the year Self-reported health problems in control group: 4% - Year-end health reports among those not offered factory jobs Self-reported health problems in factory-offer group: 8% - Year-end health reports among those offered factory jobs Factory sample: About 1,000 people across five firms - Approximate total study size and number of participating factories Women in the sample: About 80% - Most factory applicants were young women Age/education qualification: Typically 18-28 years old and around grade 8-10 education - Minimum criteria for factory applicants in the study Workers who did not show up on day one: About 10% - Early sign of low attachment to factory work Factory workers remaining by end of year: About one-third of those offered jobs - Retention outcome after high turnover Business treatment earnings effect: Roughly from $1/day to $1.33/day - Approximate increase for those receiving $300 and training Relative rise in earnings from business treatment: About one-third - Approximate earnings increase among entrepreneurship participants African economic growth rate referenced: About 6-8% overall (not per capita) - Blattman notes broad growth across many African economies over the last decade or so

Pivotal Quotes: "the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all." — Joan Robinson (quoted by Chris Blattman): Used to frame the idea that low-paid factory work may still be preferable to no work "people really hated these jobs" — Chris Blattman: His summary of the survey evidence on worker experience in the Ethiopian factories "what we need is more sweatshops for Africa" — Paul Krugman and Jeff Sachs (as cited by Blattman): Referenced as the pro-industrialization view that factories can draw labor out of low-productivity informal work

Implications: The episode suggests aid should be judged by local reality, not slogans: cash and small capital grants can improve lives directly, while factories are not automatically a blessing. For growth, however, industrialization, management quality, and market size remain crucial.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About EconTalk

EconTalk: Conversations for the Curious is an award-winning weekly podcast hosted by Russ Roberts of Shalem College in Jerusalem and Stanford's Hoover Institution. The eclectic guest list includes authors, doctors, psychologists, historians, philosophers, economists, and more. Learn how the health care system really works, the serenity that comes from humility, the challenge of interpreting data, how potato chips are made, what it's like to run an upscale Manhattan restaurant, what caused the...

View all episodes from EconTalk