Planetary Radio: Space Exploration, Astronomy and Science
Planetary Radio: Space Exploration, Astronomy and Science

Could the Soviet Union Have Won the Space Race?

Space historian and policy expert John Logsdon joins Mat Kaplan for a fascinating conversation about how the US could have lost the race to the moon.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information. See omnystudio.com/listener for pri

Featured Speakers

The Planetary Society HostJohn Logsdon Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: This episode of Planetary Radio explores an alternate-history premise: what if the Soviet Union had won the space race? Historian John Logsdon argues the USSR was never very close to beating Apollo, while reviewing key Soviet program flaws, U.S. decision points that enabled success, and how Apollo’s win shaped later policy. The show also covers OSIRIS-REx launch prep, the upcoming 2017 total solar eclipse, and a skywatch/trivia segment.

Main Topics: Alternate history: Soviet victory in the space race: The episode opens with a dramatic excerpt from The Soyuz Files and asks how world history might have changed if the USSR had reached the Moon first. Logsdon evaluates the counterfactual and says the Soviets were not truly close to winning the lunar race. Why the Soviet lunar program fell short: Logsdon explains that the Soviet Union started late, underfunded its lunar effort compared with Apollo, and suffered from severe technical and organizational problems, especially around the N1 rocket and leadership rivalries. Apollo’s key decisions and contingency points: The discussion identifies U.S. choices that made Apollo succeed, especially the move to all-up testing under George Miller and the bold decision to fly Apollo 8 to the Moon before the lander was ready. Nixon, Apollo 11, and the politics of victory: Logsdon describes Nixon’s enthusiasm for Apollo 11 and his close working relationship with Frank Borman, showing how the Moon landing became a major propaganda and political moment for the United States. What a Soviet first might have changed: The conversation speculates on consequences of a Soviet lunar first: reduced U.S. prestige, possible changes in human spaceflight policy, and a different trajectory for cooperation, the shuttle, and international space station development. Current and future U.S. exploration plans: Logsdon offers a mixed but cautiously optimistic view of current U.S. human spaceflight, supporting the Space Launch System as a Mars enabler while arguing the Moon should not be skipped on the way to Mars. Planetary Society updates and skywatching: The episode includes updates on OSIRIS-REx, Bill Nye’s comments on the upcoming North American total solar eclipse and SLS, and Bruce Betts’s skywatch segment and Mars trivia contest.

Key Arguments: The Soviet Union was not very close to beating Apollo because it entered the Moon race later, funded it at roughly one-quarter of Apollo’s level, and faced major technical failures with the N1 rocket. Personal and bureaucratic rivalries within the Soviet program, especially between Korolev and Glushko, undermined progress and contributed to hardware and engine-development problems. George Miller’s adoption of all-up testing was a crucial but often underappreciated decision that cut time out of Apollo’s schedule and helped preserve the end-of-decade goal. Apollo 8 was a pivotal risk: although not clearly driven by fear of Soviet success, it effectively won the political race to the Moon by putting Americans in lunar orbit before any Soviet flight could. A Soviet first on the Moon would likely have damaged U.S. global prestige and domestic morale while enhancing the USSR’s image as a modern, successful power. Nixon initially embraced Apollo 11 as a major propaganda victory and wanted to tie his presidency to it, but later lost enthusiasm for repetitive lunar missions. The episode suggests that human spaceflight would probably have continued even after a Soviet victory, but U.S. policy could have shifted faster toward international cooperation or different priorities. The Space Launch System is framed as important because it could eventually enable missions deeper into the solar system, particularly to Mars and Europa. Logsdon argues the Moon should remain part of the exploration path, rather than being skipped entirely in favor of Mars. The show’s ancillary segments highlight OSIRIS-REx as a major asteroid sample-return mission and the solar eclipse as a major public astronomy event.

Data Points: Launch window opening for OSIRIS-REx: September 9 - Emily Loctawala notes the start of the launch period for NASA’s first asteroid sample-return mission Gap between NASA planetary launches: 5 years - OSIRIS-REx fills the gap between MAVEN (2013) and InSight (2018) MAVEN launch year: 2013 - Used as the previous NASA planetary launch before OSIRIS-REx InSight launch year: 2018 - Identified as the next NASA planetary launch after OSIRIS-REx Time to reach asteroid: A couple of years - OSIRIS-REx is described as taking years to rendezvous, survey, and return samples North American total solar eclipse: 64 days away / next year - Bill Nye references the approaching total eclipse across the U.S. Eclipse path width: 100 kilometers wide / 60–70 miles wide - Describes the totality path across the United States Target SLS annual cost goal: Less than $2 billion per year - Bill Nye cites stated cost goals for the Space Launch System Red Square crowd estimate: Nearly 250,000 people - From the alternate-history Soviet Moon-landing scene Soviet lunar program start delay: 3 years after Kennedy’s speech - Logsdon says the USSR did not decide to send people to the Moon until 1964 Soviet lunar funding level: About one quarter of Apollo funding - Used to show the USSR’s reduced investment compared with NASA N1 launch structure: 30 engines in the first stage - Logsdon explains the complexity of the Soviet heavy-lift rocket Apollo 8 timing: August 1968 decision / December 1968 possible Soviet attempt - The U.S. decision came before the Soviet circumlunar opportunity disappeared Voyager 2 Saturn flyby: 1981 - Bruce Betts notes this week in space history Voyager 2 Neptune flyby: 1989 - Bruce Betts notes the second anniversary this week in space history Contest prize amount: 200-point iTelescope.net account - Bruce Betts describes the week’s trivia prize package Mars measurement instrument: MOLA (Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter) - A listener explains how Martian mountain heights are measured Next book timing: 2018 - Logsdon says his Reagan-and-space project is hoped to be published in 2018

Pivotal Quotes: "The Soviet Union didn't make the decision to send people to the moon until three years after Kennedy's speech in August of 1964 and funded it at about one quarter the amount of the Apollo funding." — John Logsdon: Explaining why the USSR was not close to winning the Moon race "I think it was the mission that won the race to the moon. Apollo 8." — John Logsdon: Assessing the decisive political and symbolic impact of Apollo 8 "I think it's a mistake to skip the moon on the way to Mars." — John Logsdon: His view on current U.S. exploration strategy

Implications: The episode argues that Apollo’s victory was historically contingent but hard-won, and that exploration policy still benefits from bold scheduling, sustained funding, and a Moon-to-Mars pathway. It also reminds listeners that space achievements shape national identity and global influence.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Planetary Radio: Space Exploration, Astronomy and Science

View all episodes from Planetary Radio: Space Exploration, Astronomy and Science