Science Vs
Science Vs

Creatine: A Hack To Get Jacked?

Fitness buffs online can’t stop raving about creatine. They say it is THE supplement to get you shredded in no time — and that it can even boost your brain and memory too. Are they right? We dive into the science of creatine and talk to anatomy Professor Darryn Willoughby, physicist Dr. Ali Gordji-N

Featured Speakers

Spotify Studios Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode examines creatine hype versus evidence for muscle and brain benefits. It finds creatine can modestly improve strength and muscle growth for many people, though effects are small and not universal. For cognition, evidence is mixed: it may help in sleep deprivation or other stressed states, but larger healthy-adult studies show little overall benefit. The supplement appears generally safe at recommended doses, with some side effects and cautions for kidney disease.

Main Topics: What creatine is and why it’s popular (Priority: 5/5): Creatine is described as a naturally occurring compound made from food-derived amino acids and sold as a white powder supplement. The show frames the online hype around bigger muscles, better booty gains, and even improved brain power. Creatine and muscle performance (Priority: 5/5): The episode reviews research showing creatine can help users squeeze out extra reps, modestly increase strength, and support some real muscle growth. However, the effect size is usually small and not everyone responds. Water retention vs true muscle gain (Priority: 4/5): A key debate is whether creatine only makes muscles look bigger by pulling water into muscle cells or whether it actually increases muscle tissue. The cited studies suggest at least some gains are real, not just water weight. Creatine and cognition (Priority: 5/5): The podcast contrasts a small sleep-deprivation study showing significant improvements in reaction time and memory with a larger six-week study in healthy adults that found no overall cognitive benefit. Safety, dosing, and side effects (Priority: 4/5): The episode emphasizes that creatine is generally safe at recommended doses, but may cause bloating, mild GI upset, and should be avoided by people with kidney disease. It also questions the need for a loading phase. Why creatine is not banned in sports (Priority: 3/5): The hosts note that creatine is allowed by the Olympics/WADA because it is not considered sufficiently performance-enhancing to meet banning criteria, underscoring that its benefits are real but limited.

Key Arguments: Creatine can modestly improve exercise performance by helping the body recycle ATP, giving users a few extra reps or lifts rather than dramatic transformation. Some muscle growth seen with creatine is genuine hypertrophy, though part of the early size increase may come from water being pulled into muscle cells. The internet often overstates creatine’s effects; it is not a shortcut to becoming ‘huge’ or solving all performance goals. Cognition claims are mixed: creatine may help when the brain is stressed, especially under sleep deprivation, but evidence in healthy, rested adults is weak overall. Creatine appears safe for most healthy people at 3–5 grams per day, making it a reasonable low-risk supplement to try if muscle gains are the goal. A loading phase is probably unnecessary because muscle saturation occurs fairly quickly and excess creatine is largely excreted. Some people do not respond much, and women may respond differently, but the science is not settled enough to make strong sex-specific conclusions.

Data Points: Sample size: 22 men - Darren Willoughby’s muscle study comparing creatine vs placebo Study duration: 3 months - Leg-press workout intervention in Darren Willoughby’s creatine trial Strength gain: 2–3 extra reps per set - Approximate performance improvement Darren said creatine may provide Muscle thickness increase: about 0.1 cm - Review of 10 studies measuring muscle thickness with creatine vs placebo Responders: about 1 in 4 men did not respond - Mentioned as a small study finding on creatine response variability Recommended dose: 3–5 grams per day - Dose described as safe for healthy people Loading dose: 20–25 grams per day for a week - Common loading phase described online, but questioned by the episode High-dose cognitive study dose: about 20–30 grams - Ali Gorginejad’s sleep-deprivation experiment used a much larger dose than typical Sleep-deprivation study sample: 15 people - Small crossover study testing cognition and MRI changes overnight Healthy-adult cognition study sample: 123 people - Six-week creatine vs placebo study by Fabienne Sankuler Citations: 65 - Number of citations in the episode, as stated at the end Year of bodybuilding photo: 2018 - Darren Willoughby’s last competition win shown in the segment

Pivotal Quotes: "it is not considered sufficiently performance enhancing" — World Anti-Doping Agency: Explaining why creatine is not banned in sports "Aha. Creatine was actually doing something." — Ali Gorginejad: His reaction after analyzing the sleep-deprivation cognition results "it’s safe and it might boost some muscle" — Wendy Zuckerman: Closing takeaway on creatine’s overall value

Implications: Creatine looks like a modest, generally safe supplement with small but real benefits for some people. It may help most for training and possibly under stress or sleep loss, but listeners should expect subtle rather than dramatic results.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Science Vs

There are a lot of fads, blogs and strong opinions, but then there’s SCIENCE. Science Vs is the show from Spotify Studios that finds out what’s fact, what’s not, and what’s somewhere in between. We do the hard work of sifting through all the science so you don't have to and cover everything from 5G and ADHD, to Fluoride and Fasting Diets.

View all episodes from Science Vs