Tech Wont Save Us
Tech Wont Save Us

Data Centers Are a Climate Enemy w/ Ketan Joshi

Paris Marx is joined by Ketan Joshi to discuss how hyperscale data centers are fueling the consumption of more oil and gas, what that means for climate targets, and the insidious relationship between the tech and fossil fuel industries. Ketan Joshi is a climate writer and data analyst based in Oslo

Featured Speakers

Paris Marx HostParis Marks GuestKatan Joshi Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Paris Marks and climate analyst Katan Joshi argue that data centers—especially those powering generative AI—are driving sharply rising electricity demand, which is increasingly being met by fossil fuels rather than clean energy. They also critique tech-company greenwashing, growing alliances with oil and gas, and false claims that AI or future nuclear/CCS will offset the damage.

Main Topics: Exploding data center energy demand (Priority: 5/5): Joshi explains that data center electricity use has accelerated over the past few years, decoupling from company revenue/user growth and becoming a major new driver of grid demand. Data centers and fossil fuel lock-in (Priority: 5/5): Rising demand, especially in the US, is enabling coal and gas plants to run longer and discouraging rapid emissions declines, even where renewables are growing. Greenwashing by Big Tech (Priority: 5/5): The conversation highlights how tech firms continue to market climate commitments and 'moonshot' narratives despite emissions moving in the opposite direction. Big Tech’s deepening ties to fossil fuels (Priority: 5/5): Joshi describes a shift from earlier renewable PPAs toward direct support for gas plants, LNG expansion, and fossil-fuel-friendly policy and conference alliances. Misleading climate claims around AI, nuclear, and CCS (Priority: 4/5): He argues that companies invoke AI, carbon capture, and advanced nuclear as vague future fixes that distract from present-day emissions growth. Broader energy-transition dynamics beyond data centers (Priority: 3/5): The discussion also touches on EVs, LNG demand creation, and positive renewable trends in places like Pakistan and India, showing the wider contest over energy systems.

Key Arguments: Data center energy use is not just growing; its growth rate is accelerating and no longer tracks normal business metrics like revenue or user growth. In regions with fossil-heavy grids, rapid new electricity demand tends to extend coal and gas generation rather than displace it. US data center expansion is a major contributor to the recent rise in global emissions because the US grid is still substantially fossil-fueled. Tech companies’ sustainability pledges have been repeatedly broken; emissions trajectories are moving in the opposite direction from their targets. Big Tech has shifted from buying renewables to directly backing fossil infrastructure, including gas turbines, LNG buildout, and policy efforts that weaken regulation. Claims that AI will be a climate solution are misleading because the generative-AI buildout causing the demand spike is distinct from narrow AI tools that can aid decarbonization. Fossil-fuel companies and tech companies now share a mutual interest in expanding demand for gas and coal, reinforcing each other’s business models. Some positive renewable transitions in the Global South are real and significant, but they are threatened by continued fossil-fuel export campaigns from wealthy countries.

Data Points: Time since generative AI hype wave began: ~3 years - Marks notes the wave began in November 2022 and the interview is taking place around COP30. US power demand growth from data centers: 50% - Joshi cites the IEA report showing data centers accounted for half of US electricity demand growth from 2023 to 2024. Electricity/emissions trajectory: ~2.5 to 3 degrees warming path - Joshi says current global emissions are increasing in line with a trajectory that leads to roughly 2.5–3°C warming. Global energy-system emissions change: Slight increase from 2023 to 2024 - He says world energy-system emissions rose slightly year over year. Data-center share of company energy use: Mostly data centers - Joshi notes that for major tech firms, most reported energy consumption is tied to data centers. Norway EV penetration: 25% to 28% of vehicles/miles traveled - He uses Norway as an example of high EV adoption but still partial fleet transition. Remaining fossil-fuel vehicle share in Norway: About 75% - In Norway, he says the rest of the vehicle fleet is still fossil-fueled. Meta Louisiana data center: 2-gigawatt - Joshi references Meta’s large planned data center and associated gas power buildout in Louisiana. Renewable PPAs financing period: 20 years - He explains how companies like Amazon used long-term power purchase agreements to support renewable projects. CCS capture example: 0.5% of emissions captured - Joshi uses this as an example of how carbon capture was portrayed in glossy sustainability reports versus actual impact. Global carbon budget contribution: Largest single chunk from US energy growth - He says the biggest single national contributor to the rise in global emissions was US energy demand growth.

Pivotal Quotes: "That's not how a moonshot works, man. Like, that's you have to build a rocket and you go to the moon. But they are flying very specifically away from the moon." — Paris Marks (quoting/paraphrasing Microsoft’s climate rhetoric): Used to criticize Microsoft’s shifting metaphors for failing climate targets despite claiming a ‘moonshot.’ "They built a rocket and flew in exactly the wrong direction." — Paris Marks: A sharp summary of how tech companies’ emissions trajectories diverge from their climate promises. "We do not know what data centers are for, right? Like, it's not clear why data centers are now competing with all electric vehicles or all heat pump installations or keeping people warm in winter." — Katan Joshi: Joshi questions why data-center load growth is being treated as equivalent to essential household or transport demand.

Implications: Data centers are now a major climate and grid issue, not a niche efficiency problem. Listeners should expect rising electricity costs, more fossil-fuel lock-in, and stronger pressure on climate groups and policymakers to confront Big Tech’s real emissions footprint.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Tech Wont Save Us

Silicon Valley wants to shape our future, but why should we let it? Every Thursday, Paris Marx is joined by a new guest to critically examine the tech industry, its big promises, and the people behind them. Tech Won’t Save Us challenges the notion that tech alone can drive our world forward by showing that separating tech from politics has consequences for us all, especially the most vulnerable. It’s not your usual tech podcast.

View all episodes from Tech Wont Save Us