Intelligence Squared
Intelligence Squared

Dickens vs Tolstoy: The Battle Of The Great 19th-century Novelists PART 2

This is the second instalment of a three-part episode. Dickens. Tolstoy. Their names and reputations shake the ground – and so do their books, if you drop one. But whose legacy is more enduring? Whose vision truer and more relevant today? Should you embark on War and Peace or Our Mutual Friend? To b

Featured Speakers

Simon Schama Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Simon Schama argues Tolstoy surpasses Dickens through psychological realism, moral seriousness, and immersive depiction of war, nature, and interior life. Using passages from Haji Murat, War and Peace, Anna Karenina, and a childbirth scene, he presents Tolstoy as a writer of people rather than caricatures, whose prose captures reality, suffering, and consciousness with unmatched force.

Main Topics: Tolstoy’s realism versus Dickens’s theatricality (Priority: 5/5): Schama contrasts Dickens’s performative, audience-facing style with Tolstoy’s quieter, more immersive prose that seeks to place readers inside a lived world rather than in front of a spectacle. War, violence, and moral revulsion (Priority: 5/5): Tolstoy’s experience in the Caucasus and the Crimean War shaped a rejection of flamboyance and a searing literary treatment of cruelty, especially in the Haji Murat village raid passage. Nature as an active force (Priority: 4/5): Schama emphasizes Tolstoy’s extraordinary attention to place, weather, animals, and seasons, arguing that nature functions as a real actor in his fiction, especially in war and survival scenes. Psychological depth and interior consciousness (Priority: 5/5): Tolstoy is praised for drama of consciousness, where inner states, pauses, and body language reveal more than dialogue; Schama suggests this anticipates modernist techniques like Joyce. Women, love, and emotional complexity (Priority: 4/5): Tolstoy is presented as more sophisticated than Dickens in depicting women’s relationships, romantic disappointment, jealousy, and marital strain, especially through Anna Karenina’s sisters and lovers. Birth, suffering, and human vulnerability (Priority: 4/5): The childbirth scene from Anna Karenina is used to show Tolstoy’s ability to render raw physical pain and emotional collapse with almost unbearable immediacy.

Key Arguments: Tolstoy should be read not as forbidding or intimidating, but as a writer who gives readers a full life within his books rather than just a story. Tolstoy’s prose is more rooted in reality than Dickens’s: he writes people, not types or caricatures, and resists theatrical naming and melodrama. His war experience made him suspicious of ornament and performance, producing a colder, flatter, more truthful style for scenes of devastation. Nature in Tolstoy is not background but an active force that shapes human fate, especially in winter, fog, and battlefield conditions. Tolstoy’s fiction captures interior conflict through gestures, omissions, and shifts in thought, creating a modern psychological realism that influences later writers. Unlike Dickens, who often polarizes women into saints or monsters, Tolstoy portrays women’s emotional lives, desires, humiliation, and mutual understanding with greater nuance. The childbirth sequence in Anna Karenina demonstrates how Tolstoy transforms physical suffering into literary drama, showing consciousness under extreme pressure.

Data Points: Debate segment: Part 2 of 3 - The transcript is explicitly introduced as the second part of a three-part episode. First aired: 2018 - The host notes the debate event originally aired in 2018. Tolstoy reading in London: 1861 - Schama says Tolstoy heard Dickens read A Christmas Carol in London in 1861. Tolstoy’s only public reading: 1 time - He states Tolstoy read aloud only once in his life, to family and friends, in 1864. Tolstoy writing period for Haji Murat: 1896–1904 - Schama says Tolstoy returned repeatedly to the story during this period. Battle referenced: Austerlitz - Used in discussing the fog passage in War and Peace. Battle referenced: Borodino - Used in discussing battlefield realism and the field surgeon detail. Reader participation: No majority - Schama asks how many people have read Tolstoy and notes there is not a majority of hands raised.

Pivotal Quotes: "if the world could write itself, it would write like Tolstoy." — Isaac Babel (quoted by Simon Schama): Schama uses this line to capture Tolstoy’s realism and scale. "It was not hatred, but a refusal to recognize these Russian dogs as human beings" — Narrator reading Tolstoy: From Haji Murat, describing the Chechen villagers’ response to Russian devastation. "Tolstoy has a grip on a particular reality: the lives of women." — Simon Schama: Introduces his argument that Tolstoy depicts female emotional life with unusual depth.

Implications: Listeners are left with Tolstoy framed as a foundational realist and psychological novelist whose methods foreshadow modern literature. The segment argues for rereading him as intensely alive, not intimidating, and still central to understanding human experience.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Intelligence Squared

View all episodes from Intelligence Squared