Ones and Tooze
Ones and Tooze

Does Davos Have a Trust Problem?

The theme of the 54th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum at Davos is "Rebuilding Trust." Do the rich and powerful have our trust? Do they deserve it? Adam and Cameron dig in. Also on the show: Will the Biden administration block the $14.1 billion bid by Japan's Nippon Steel to

Featured Speakers

Adam Tooze HostAdam Tooze Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode opens with a BetterHelp ad before turning to two themes: the World Economic Forum in Davos and Nippon Steel’s bid for U.S. Steel. Adam Tooze argues Davos is increasingly a stage for signaling and deal-making rather than substantive problem-solving, while its theme of “rebuilding trust” reveals the forum’s discomfort with power, inequality, and conflict. On U.S. Steel, he says the national-security and labor arguments against the Japanese takeover are weak, and that the controversy exposes the inconsistency of U.S. friend-shoring and economic nationalism.

Main Topics: What Davos Actually Does (Priority: 5/5): The hosts examine whether Davos is a venue for substantive policy discussion or mostly a platform for networking, deal-making, and elite signaling. Tooze says it does host bilateral diplomacy and some coordination, but its main function is now presence and PR. The Theme of 'Rebuilding Trust' (Priority: 5/5): They discuss Davos 2024's theme and argue that trust is hard to rebuild because the forum avoids direct engagement with hierarchy, power, inequality, and distributional conflict. Davos vs. Munich Security Conference (Priority: 4/5): Tooze contrasts Davos with Munich, portraying Munich as a more serious Western-centric security forum while Davos claims global reach but has become more politically awkward and confrontational. Nippon Steel’s Bid for U.S. Steel (Priority: 5/5): The second half analyzes Nippon Steel’s $14.1 billion takeover bid and why the Japanese firm is stronger globally, more technologically advanced, and strategically motivated to buy a relatively small U.S. player. National Security as a Weak Justification (Priority: 5/5): Tooze rejects the U.S. government’s claim that blocking the deal is necessary for national security, arguing steel supply is not a binding constraint for modern weapons production and the rhetoric is exaggerated. Labor Politics and 'Good Jobs' (Priority: 4/5): The episode critiques the argument that the deal threatens union jobs, noting firms do not exist to preserve jobs but to maximize profit, and that Nippon Steel’s labor record is not obviously worse than U.S. Steel’s. Friend-shoring and U.S. Economic Nationalism (Priority: 5/5): The discussion closes by arguing that the episode exposes the inconsistency of Biden-era friend-shoring: in practice, domestic politics still override allied investment and trade principles.

Key Arguments: Davos still facilitates some real bilateral meetings and occasional diplomacy, but its dominant role is now elite signaling and coordinated image management. The forum’s language of trust, confidence, and leadership obscures deeper conflicts over power, hierarchy, inequality, and distribution. Munich Security Conference is a more clearly defined Western security forum; Davos aspires to be global but is less coherent in the current geopolitical climate. Nippon Steel is far stronger than U.S. Steel, with larger scale, better global positioning, and greater relevance to the future of the industry. The U.S. national-security case is overstated because steel production is not the limiting factor in making artillery shells, tanks, or aircraft carriers at current needs. The labor argument is also weak because firms pursue profits, not job preservation; labor relations would likely be negotiated pragmatically regardless of ownership. The controversy reveals that friend-shoring is politically fragile and can be displaced by nationalist symbolism and election-year incentives.

Data Points: Davos annual meeting count: 54th annual meeting - The World Economic Forum meeting in Davos is described as the 54th annual gathering. BetterHelp discount: 10% off first month - Podcast ad offer for listeners using betterhelp.com/ones twos. BetterHelp platform size: 30,000 therapists - Ad claims BetterHelp has 30,000 therapists available for matching. BetterHelp global users: over 5 million people globally - Ad claims the platform serves more than 5 million people worldwide. BetterHelp rating: 4.9 out of 5 - Ad cites average live-session rating from client reviews. BetterHelp reviews: 1.7 million client reviews - Ad supports the stated platform rating. U.S. Steel takeover bid: $14.1 billion - Nippon Steel’s offer to acquire U.S. Steel. Japanese blast furnaces in late 1960s: 8 of the 10 largest blast furnaces in the world - Tooze cites Japan’s early industrial steel dominance. Nippon Steel global rank: 4th - Current ranking among global steel producers. U.S. Steel global rank: 27th - Current ranking among global steel producers. Top U.S. producer rank: 15th (Nucor) - The only American firm in the top 15 is Nucor, not U.S. Steel. Top Chinese producer vs U.S. Steel output: 10 times as much - Tooze says the largest Chinese producer makes about 10x U.S. Steel’s output. Nippon Steel vs U.S. Steel output: 4 times as much - Tooze compares Nippon Steel’s output to U.S. Steel’s. 55 mm artillery round weight: 43 kilos - Used to estimate steel needs for ammunition production. Steel per artillery shell estimate: 30 kilograms - Approximate steel content per 155 mm artillery round after subtracting explosives/fuse. Million artillery rounds steel need: 30,000 tons - Estimated steel required to make one million shells. Nucor annual steel output: 20 million tons - Used to show that U.S. steel production dwarfs military steel needs. Aircraft carrier steel need: 70,000 tons - Approximate steel required to build an aircraft carrier. M1 Abrams tank steel need: 50 tons - Steel content of one tank. Hypothetical tank fleet steel need: 100,000 tons - If 2,000 tanks were built, total steel need would be about this much. Potential wartime steel need: 2-3 million tons - Tooze estimates maximum heavy-armament production would still be a fraction of current U.S. producer output.

Pivotal Quotes: "what's really happening here is presence, flags being flown essentially" — Adam Tooze: His description of Davos as a platform for signaling and elite visibility rather than serious problem-solving. "they love words like trust, they love words like confidence, governance, leadership, and so on. But what they are leery about facing and talking about and addressing straight head-on is really what that has to be built on" — Adam Tooze: On why Davos struggles with its theme of rebuilding trust. "you really have to ask yourselves: you know, have you no shame? I mean, seriously, have you?" — Adam Tooze: His response to the Biden administration's national-security justification for blocking Nippon Steel’s bid.

Implications: The episode suggests elite forums like Davos are losing coherence amid geopolitics, while U.S. industrial policy is becoming more nationalist and internally inconsistent. The U.S.-Japan steel dispute may still be resolved in favor of the deal, but it exposes how election politics can override friend-shoring.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Ones and Tooze

Foreign Policy economics columnist Adam Tooze, a history professor and a popular author, is encyclopedic about basically everything: from the COVID shutdown, to climate change, to pasta sauce. On our new podcast, Tooze and FP deputy editor Cameron Abadi will look at two data points each week that explain the world: one drawn from the week’s headlines and the other from just about anywhere else Tooze takes us. Check out Adam Tooze’s column at https://foreignpolicy.com/author/adam-tooze/.

View all episodes from Ones and Tooze