In Our Time
In Our Time

Duty

Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the concept of duty. George Bernard Shaw wrote in his play Caesar and Cleopatra, “When a stupid man is doing something he is ashamed of, he always declares that it is his duty”. But for Horatio Nelson and so many others, duty has provided a purpose for life, and a rea

Featured Speakers

Horatio Nelson GuestThomas Hobbes Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode traces the history of duty from ancient Greek notions of obligation through Plato, Aristotle, Stoicism, Christianity, Hobbes, Locke, Kant, Nelson, and Nietzsche. It shows duty shifting from role-based social obligation to universal moral law, then becoming contested in modern rights-based, individualist society.

Main Topics: Ancient Greek obligations and the lack of a direct term for duty (Priority: 5/5): The discussion starts with Homer, the polis, and Plato, arguing that Greeks had duties-like obligations tied to role, gods, and civic order, but not a modern concept of human rights that would mirror duty. Plato, justice, and civic obligation (Priority: 5/5): Plato’s Republic is used to show duty as acting justly toward others and serving the city; even philosopher-kings have a duty to return from contemplation and govern. Aristotle, practical wisdom, and role-based responsibilities (Priority: 4/5): Aristotle is presented as shifting focus from abstract ideals to practical judgment and flourishing, while still preserving duties tied to one’s office, station, or role. Stoicism, Cicero, and Christian moral duty (Priority: 5/5): Stoics universalized responsibility while emphasizing self-control; Cicero systematized duty, and Augustine and Aquinas fused Christian command, justice, and natural law into a moral framework. Hobbes and Locke: secularizing obligation and authority (Priority: 4/5): Hobbes grounds obligation in self-chosen rational contracts and absolute sovereignty, while Locke reflects the decline of divine-right authority and the rise of individual autonomy and political rights. Kant, Nelson, and modern universal duty (Priority: 5/5): Kant defines duty as categorical, universal, and independent of self-interest; Nelson’s famous wartime command shows duty becoming a national and moral ideal of sacrifice. Nietzsche and the modern critique of duty (Priority: 4/5): Nietzsche is presented as attacking duty as a tool of slave morality and social control, helping explain why duty now feels suspect in a rights-centered culture.

Key Arguments: The ancient Greeks expressed obligations and civic/religious responsibilities, but their moral world was organized around virtue and happiness rather than a fully modern notion of duty. Plato reframed obligation through justice: people are not naturally self-sufficient, so ethical life requires acting rightly toward others and serving the political whole. Aristotle differentiated duty from knowledge of the good by stressing practical wisdom; right action depends on judgment in context rather than fixed rules. The Stoics and later Cicero made duty more universal, but still tied it to rational self-command and social responsibility. Christian thinkers, especially Augustine and Aquinas, transformed duty by rooting it in divine command, eternal law, and natural law while preserving worldly authority. Hobbes secularized obligation by arguing that duties arise from acts of our own and serve social peace under sovereign authority. Locke marks a major political shift away from divine-right monarchy toward claims, autonomy, toleration, and rights. Kant is central because he separates duty from self-interest and consequences, making duty categorical and foundational to deontological ethics. Nelson’s command shows duty as both patriotic and emotionally powerful, capable of giving life meaning and justifying sacrifice. Nietzsche criticizes duty as often serving domination and weakness, helping explain contemporary discomfort with the term. Modern society prefers rights and self-fulfillment, making duty seem external unless it is reconnected to personal aspirations and reciprocal claims.

Data Points: Historical span: From Homeric Greece to 19th-century Nietzsche - The episode surveys the long evolution of duty across Western thought. Key Roman work: De Officiis - Cicero’s treatise on duty is highlighted as a major classical text. Christian law code: Ten Commandments - Cited as a foundational model of duty ethics with absolute prohibitions. Aquinas’s framework: Four laws - Mentioned as integrating earthly order with divine and natural law. Date: First century - Cicero’s De Officiis is referenced as a first-century work. Date: 13th century - Aquinas’s Summa Theologica is discussed in this period. Date: 17th century - Used to frame Hobbes and Locke amid civil war and political change. Date: 1805 - Nelson’s Trafalgar signal is placed in this year.

Pivotal Quotes: "Thank God I have done my duty" — Horatio Nelson: Cited as Nelson’s reported final words, illustrating duty as a noble end-of-life ideal. "there is no obligation upon any man that ariseth not from some act of his own" — Thomas Hobbes: Used to show Hobbes’s view that obligations are self-assumed rather than simply imposed. "England expects every man to do his duty" — Horatio Nelson: Referenced as the famous Trafalgar signal that made duty a national ideal.

Implications: The episode suggests duty has shifted from role-based obedience to contested moral principle. For listeners, it clarifies why duty now sounds old-fashioned, yet remains vital whenever rights depend on reciprocal obligations.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About In Our Time

View all episodes from In Our Time