We the Builders
We the Builders

E1: Shahin Farshchi: Investing at Lux Capital and Accelerating a Sci-Fi Future

This is it—the very first episode of We The Builders. Earlier this year, I sat down with Shahin Farshchi in LA. He is a General Partner at Lux Capital, a venture fund with $5B AUM. To kick us off, who better than the man who was investing in hard tech 18 years before it was cool: Shahin has invested

Featured Speakers

Suffiyan Malik Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Shaheen of Lux Capital traces his path from an engineering-obsessed childhood, immigration and adaptation in Iran, and PhD research into venture capital. The conversation centers on how persistence, empathy, and relationship-building matter more than pedigree, why great founders create markets rather than merely chase them, and why deep-tech commercialization is a team sport requiring both technical insight and business judgment.

Main Topics: Early life, immigration, and empathy (Priority: 5/5): Shaheen describes growing up around engineering and compute, then spending years in Iran as a teenager where he had to learn the language and adapt quickly. He says that experience made him more empathetic and better at building trust. Education systems, cramming, and what they teach (Priority: 4/5): He contrasts Iranian-style memorization-heavy schooling with U.S. AP-style rigor, arguing that traditional systems often teach time management, prioritization, and selective memorization more than deep learning. Research, persistence, and grant funding (Priority: 5/5): Shaheen explains how he pursued lab opportunities at Berkeley and UCLA through students and persistence, then funded his PhD by writing roughly 30 grants before landing a $650,000 NSF grant. Why he left academia for venture capital (Priority: 5/5): He became disillusioned with how much academic science is spent fundraising and admin work, concluding he wanted to work on the 'money of science' rather than remain in the grant-chasing side of research. Choosing what to work on: problem, product, and market creation (Priority: 5/5): He argues that great founders and investors focus not just on technology but on whether a product can create a market, then defend a strong position in that market through moats, brand, or vertical integration. Founder evaluation: agency, tenacity, and team dynamics (Priority: 5/5): Shaheen says he looks primarily for people who can hire and raise capital, emphasizing charisma, empathy, and persistence over background, age, or lifestyle choices. Agency is visible in behavior, not how many hours someone spends in a garage. Future of education and deep-tech commercialization (Priority: 4/5): He questions whether higher education is cost-effective and argues universities should reduce breadth and increase depth. He also says PhDs are often less suited than young engineers to commercialize research, while cross-disciplinary teams are essential.

Key Arguments: Immigration and cultural adaptation build empathy, and empathy is a major advantage in people-heavy businesses like venture capital. Traditional education often rewards memorization, prioritization, and time management as much as genuine understanding. Persistence matters: he wrote about 30 grant applications before securing one NSF award that funded his PhD. A strong scientific idea is not enough; a company needs a viable business model and market structure. The best startups often create markets rather than wait for existing ones, but they must also establish a defensible moat. Founders should be evaluated on agency, charisma, hiring ability, and fundraising ability more than on pedigree or whether they fit a stereotypical founder lifestyle. Breakthrough innovation is usually a collective process; the discovery is only the first step, and execution/marketing/financing determine impact. PhDs are often too specialized to commercialize technology effectively; commercialization usually requires broader, cross-disciplinary engineering talent. Universities are valuable for community and peer networks, but higher education should be judged against its time and opportunity cost. Investor behavior should be long-term and relationship-driven; the best investors engage before money is needed.

Data Points: Years in Iran: a few years - Shaheen lived in Iran as a teenager before returning to the United States for college. Grade-level concern: 1 year behind friends - He worried about being held back a grade in Iran and losing alignment with his U.S. peer group. Number of grant applications: ~30 - He said he wrote roughly 30 grant proposals before one NSF grant succeeded. NSF grant size: $650,000 - The successful NSF grant funded his PhD research and others after him. VC experience: 17 years - He referenced having observed founders and evaluated characteristics over 17 years in venture capital. Interviewed period for company discovery: 1 to 4 years - The discussion noted that deep-tech companies often spend years in discovery before commercialization. PhD timeline example: up to 10 years - He said complex companies may take as long as 10 years because cross-disciplinary discovery and team-building take time. University degree duration: 4 years - He questioned whether the standard four-year undergraduate model is always worth the opportunity cost.

Pivotal Quotes: "I believe that there is a scenario where everybody can emerge as a winner." — Shaheen: He explains his preference for collaboration and pie-expansion over zero-sum competition. "You should get to know investors when you're not asking for money or advice." — UCLA professor (quoted by Shaheen): Advice that led Shaheen to build investor relationships before launching his venture career. "Can this person hire? Can this person raise money?" — Shaheen: His core founder evaluation framework, prioritizing execution and capital formation.

Implications: For founders and students, the message is to build agency, seek cross-disciplinary depth, and think long-term. For investors and educators, it suggests valuing people, market creation, and flexibility over rigid credentials and one-size-fits-all pathways.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About We the Builders

Conversations with practitioners at the edge of their craft across business, media, startups, frontier technologies, investing.

View all episodes from We the Builders