How I Invest
How I Invest

E344: How the Top Family Offices are Investing Today

What if the families with the largest fortunes generate the highest returns not by chasing hot sectors, but by pacing capital, managing liquidity, and investing with a multi-decade horizon? In this episode, I sit down with Douglas Evans, Chief Investment Officer & Partner at Callan Family Office

Featured Speakers

David Weisburd Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Doug argues that ultra-high-net-worth families should invest more like institutions: with a long horizon, tolerance for illiquidity, and a disciplined private-capital pacing plan. He emphasizes venture investing, vintage-year diversification, QSBS/tax awareness, the need to rethink liquidity as private markets stay private longer, and the likely rise of continuation vehicles and private secondary markets. He closes by stressing stewardship, culture, and long-term values in both investing and family governance.

Main Topics: Ultra-wealthy families should invest like institutions (Priority: 5/5): Doug says large family offices have the scale, patience, and illiquidity tolerance to follow institutional-style portfolio construction rather than mimicking liquid retail portfolios. Taxable investing, compounders, and QSBS (Priority: 5/5): In taxable environments, families should seek businesses that can compound for decades and consider structures like QSBS that can reduce capital gains friction and improve after-tax outcomes. Building a venture book from scratch (Priority: 5/5): Starting a venture program requires an end-state plan, pacing model, initial use of secondaries and broad funds, and a decision about whether the family office is passive allocator or active participant. Vintage-year diversification and capital pacing (Priority: 5/5): Venture outcomes vary dramatically by vintage year, so families should diversify across multiple vintages and manage capital calls and deployment timing carefully. DPI crisis and the evolution of private markets (Priority: 5/5): Low distributions from venture and private funds are constraining recycling of capital, pushing the market toward continuation vehicles, more private secondary liquidity, and possibly greater pressure for companies to go public. Reframing public vs. private risk and asset allocation (Priority: 4/5): The speakers argue that many traditional labels are outdated; investors should think in first principles about debt vs. equity and what assets they actually own, especially as more innovation stays private. Stewardship, culture, and multigenerational wealth (Priority: 4/5): The conversation closes on values: enduring families and businesses are built on stewardship, humility, good people, and modeled behavior rather than pure wealth accumulation.

Key Arguments: Ultra-high-net-worth families can and should behave more like institutions because they have longer time horizons, greater scale, and more tolerance for illiquidity than typical affluent investors. For taxable investors, the downstream consequences of portfolio design are huge; investing in long-duration compounders and tax-advantaged structures can meaningfully change outcomes. QSBS remains a powerful tool for early-stage taxable investors because it can shield a significant amount of capital gains and its thresholds were recently increased. A serious venture program needs private-capital pacing: an explicit plan for vintages, deployment cadence, capital calls, and portfolio end-state, rather than opportunistic one-off investing. Venture performance is heavily dependent on vintage year, so diversification across roughly six to seven vintages can reduce timing risk. In venture, the best vintages often follow the worst ones, making persistence through downturns especially important. The current venture market has a DPI problem; many funds are returning too little cash, which hurts recycling and makes fundraising harder. Continuation vehicles are likely to expand into venture because they can generate DPI, satisfy LP liquidity demands, and align incentives around long-held private winners. Private markets have grown so large that investors must rethink the public/private split; many of the most important growth companies remain private for far longer than before. The right response to market change is to revisit first principles: what you own, what risks you are actually taking, and whether you are mismatching equity-like risk with debt-like returns. Long-term success in wealth and business is tied to stewardship, humility, and strong culture; wealth without values often fails across generations.

Data Points: Family office scale: $10 billion - Doug is introduced as CIO of a $10 billion multifamily office. QSBS enterprise value threshold: $50 million to $75 million - He says the enterprise value cap for QSBS qualification rose under recent legislation. QSBS gain exclusion: $10 million to $15 million - He says the amount of capital gains that can be excluded increased. Public equities count: Below 4,500 from an original 5,000 - He contrasts shrinking public-market opportunity with expanding private markets. Private-company transaction count: North of 50,000 - He says private companies with equity or debt transactions vastly outnumber public listings. Private-market opportunity ratio: 10X - He compares private-company opportunities to public-company opportunities. Typical venture vintage diversification: 6 to 7 vintage years - He recommends spreading venture exposure across multiple vintages. Best vintages after worst vintages: 80%+ of the time - He cites Cambridge data suggesting strong vintages often follow weak ones. Venture bull run: 13-year bull run - He describes venture from 2008 to 2022 as a prolonged boom. DPI benchmark in Swenson model: ~24% DPI per year - He says the traditional private-asset model assumed this level of annual distributions. Current DPI example: 9% in 2024 and 9% in 2025 - He says actual distributions are far below the historical assumption. 2020 vintage venture funds: 50% have under 0.1x DPI - He cites a current distribution crisis among recent venture vintages. Magnitude of return shortfall: Cash back is 2.5x smaller than cash in - He uses this to explain why the old private-markets model breaks. Continuation vehicles market size: $100 billion+ - He says continuation vehicles have surpassed this level and are growing fast. Continuations fund example: $1.9 billion - He references a large fund focused on continuation vehicles and buyouts. Vesting period in early venture: 4 years - He says the original stock vesting period matched the time from first funding to IPO. Former IPO timeline: About 4 years from first venture funding to IPO - He cites an Eric Bond/Hustle Fund explanation of the historical venture cycle.

Pivotal Quotes: "the ultra high net worth really can and should invest more like an institution" — Doug: Core thesis on how large family offices should approach investing. "The worst thing you could do is to take equity-like risk with debt-like returns." — Doug: Warning against mismatched risk/return expectations, especially in private credit. "Keep your priorities straight. God, family, others, and then yourself." — Doug: Advice he says he would give his younger self about life and stewardship.

Implications: Family offices should upgrade private-market discipline: pace capital, diversify vintages, plan liquidity, and rethink structures like secondaries and continuation vehicles. Investors who adapt to lower DPI and longer hold periods may capture the best private compounding opportunities.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About How I Invest

How I Invest with David Weisburd is a podcast that interviews the world's leading institutional investors. Previous guests include The Ford Foundation, Northwestern University Endowment, CalPERS, Stepstone, and other top limited partners.

View all episodes from How I Invest