Episode Summary
Executive Summary: The CIO of FEG Investment Advisors explains how venture investing is shifting from a pure early-stage, access-driven strategy to a more nuanced approach that includes late-stage exposure, AI winners, and faster-distribution vehicles. He emphasizes manager selection, diversification, mark quality, and portfolio design across public, private, and hedge fund sleeves, while highlighting AI as a cross-asset force and a major source of both opportunity and risk.
Main Topics: Venture as an access class, not a broad asset class (Priority: 5/5): The speaker argues venture only works when investors access elite managers; otherwise the risk/return tradeoff is unattractive. Historically this meant early-stage and seed-focused managers capturing ownership and outsized upside. Late-stage/private growth exposure is now necessary (Priority: 5/5): Because companies stay private longer and wealth is created before IPOs, the team now wants exposure to large multi-stage funds to access growth in companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Stripe, complementing early-stage bets. DPI pressure, marks, and portfolio liquidity (Priority: 5/5): The discussion distinguishes real distribution shortfalls from mark skepticism, argues DPI arrives later in venture, and advocates complementary strategies like small growth equity and selective secondaries to improve cash flow and manage liquidity. What changes as companies scale (Priority: 4/5): Early-stage VC requires thought partnership, recruiting first believers, and personality-driven hustle, while scaling from $100M to $1B revenue demands delegation, organizational design, and operational management. AI as a portfolio-wide disruption and opportunity (Priority: 5/5): AI is framed as affecting every asset class, forcing investors to measure exposure, distinguish infrastructure from adopters, and think carefully about laggards and winners across public equity, private markets, real assets, and credit. Public equity tools: extensions and portable alpha (Priority: 4/5): The speaker explains 130/30 and 150/50 strategies as ways to use long/short tools within public equities, and portable alpha as a structure that pairs market beta via futures with alpha-seeking hedge fund strategies. AI-driven productivity inside the investment process (Priority: 3/5): FEG is using AI for faster diligence, summarizing legal documents, improving CRM workflows, and generating commentary, with the goal of freeing time for higher-value portfolio decisions.
Key Arguments: Venture should be treated as an access class: if you are not in top-tier managers, the risk is not worth taking. Companies staying private longer means investors need exposure to late-stage private winners, not just seed and early-stage funds. There is no virtue in complexity for its own sake; investors should own some earlier-stage exposure and some late-stage exposure rather than make a 180-degree strategic shift. DPI matters because institutions need cash back to fund commitments and liabilities, but venture naturally produces slower distributions than public markets. Secondary sales have evolved from taboo to a useful liquidity tool for venture investors. TVPI and DPI are often correlated over the long run, but LPs should inspect how much mark-up comes from actual revenue growth versus multiple expansion. Early-stage VC success is driven by thought partnership, first-believer recruiting, and speed; later-stage success depends more on organization building, delegation, and management. AI should be measured across the whole portfolio because it can affect public equities, venture, real estate, infrastructure, and fixed income simultaneously. Diversification is harder than it sounds because assets in different geographies can be highly correlated while seemingly different assets can be uncorrelated. 130/30 and portable alpha exist because active managers often underperform after fees; these structures broaden tools and may improve net outcomes when used carefully. Investors should not take excessive leverage across extensions, private equity, and real estate at the same time, especially if rates rise. AI is already being used to save time on document review, commentary drafting, and portfolio analysis, and younger staff may gain disproportionate productivity advantages.
Data Points: AUA: $90 billion - FEG Investment Advisors assets under advisement were described at the start of the conversation. Investment team size: 30 people - The speaker said FEG manages a 30-person investment team. Private assets under advisement: $100 billion+ - He noted the firm had crossed $100 billion in AUA, though it can move lower with market changes. Client mix: 90% taxable versus non-taxable clarification - The speaker corrected the framing and said FEG works primarily in the non-taxable world. Allocator Training Institute return model: 24% modeled yearly return - He referenced the classic endowment model created in the 1980s as modeling roughly 24% annual return on capital. 2024 venture return figure: 9% - He cited 2024 as a 9% return year according to the Allocator Training Institute. 2025 venture return figure: 9% - He cited 2025 as also 9% according to the Allocator Training Institute. Typical early-stage manager size: $300 million fund - He contrasted small early-stage venture funds with large multi-stage funds. Typical large multi-stage fund size: $10 billion fund - Used as an example of late-stage, asset-gathering venture platforms. Small growth equity revenue range: $3 million to $10 million - He defined the revenue range for small growth equity managers. Small growth equity growth rate: 50% to 100% annually - He described the growth profile of those companies. Typical venture fund outcome: 3x net - He suggested a strong venture portfolio can produce around 3x net overall. Top venture fund outcome: 5x to 10x net - He said some venture funds still produce five- and ten-times net outcomes. Early-stage return potential: 50x to 100x on some companies - He described the classic early-stage venture mandate. Employee productivity projection: 3x to 5x more productive - He predicted one employee in five years could equal three to five people from 2004 due to AI tools. Portable alpha example leverage: $100 invested with about $5 margin - He explained how S&P futures can provide market exposure with low margin requirements. Extension strategy example: 130/30 - He described a portfolio long 130% and short 30% of capital. Alternative extension example: 150/50 - He referenced more levered long/short public equity variants.
Pivotal Quotes: "viewing it as an access class, not an asset class" — Nolan: Core philosophy on venture investing and manager selection. "there's no points for difficulty in investing" — Nolan: Argument that investors should choose effective strategies, even if they feel less exciting or less contrarian. "Anyone that tells you they have it all figured out is lying to you" — Nolan: AI, portfolio construction, and cross-asset exposure are still evolving; humility is required.
Implications: LPs and allocators may need to rethink venture, public equity, and AI exposure as one interconnected system. Success will depend on manager access, liquidity planning, disciplined diversification, and using AI to improve decision quality and speed.
About How I Invest
How I Invest with David Weisburd is a podcast that interviews the world's leading institutional investors. Previous guests include The Ford Foundation, Northwestern University Endowment, CalPERS, Stepstone, and other top limited partners.