How I Invest
How I Invest

E376: The $3 Trillion Liquidity Problem in Venture Capital

What if the biggest opportunity in venture today isn’t funding new companies—but solving the liquidity crisis created by companies staying private for 20 years? In this episode, I sit down with Jared Carmel, Founder and Managing Partner of Manhattan Venture Partners, to discuss how venture secondari

Featured Speakers

David Weisburd Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Jared explained that venture has become a long-duration, liquidity-constrained asset class: capital is locked up far beyond the traditional 10-year fund life because private companies can stay private longer, creating negative DPI and a growing need for secondary markets, continuation vehicles, and institutional liquidity solutions. He argued that trust, not just returns, drives capital allocation and that MVP’s edge is acting as a pressure-release valve for cap tables while institutionalizing private-market liquidity.

Main Topics: Venture’s liquidity crisis and the rise of the secondary market (Priority: 5/5): Jared argued that trillions in venture capital are effectively trapped because funds are aging past their intended life without returning cash. This creates a structural mismatch between 20-year company journeys and 10-year fund structures, making secondaries essential infrastructure. Why companies stay private for decades (Priority: 5/5): He said companies stay private because they can: private capital is abundant, private governance is more flexible, and avoiding quarterly public-market pressure allows faster iteration and pivots without activist scrutiny. DPI as the real test for LPs and GPs (Priority: 5/5): The conversation stressed that DPI matters more than IRR or paper marks. Lower-than-expected distributions break the traditional endowment model and force LPs to rethink re-ups, liquidity expectations, and fund pacing. Institutionalization of secondary markets (Priority: 4/5): Jared described the evolution from a gray retail-heavy market to an institutional market dominated by sophisticated buyers, tender offers, and structured transactions, with retail increasingly pushed into safer, blessed vehicles. Risks of unauthorized SPVs and retail access (Priority: 4/5): He warned that layering SPVs on top of SPVs, share rehypothecation, and unauthorized cap-table access can create legal and reputational blowups, especially in names like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX. Continuation vehicles as a solution (Priority: 4/5): Continuation vehicles were framed as a powerful tool to solve liquidity, extend holding periods, and convert unrealized gains into DPI, though they can complicate venture-exempt status and regulatory treatment. Trust, partnership, and team-building as competitive advantages (Priority: 4/5): Jared emphasized that long-term success in capital markets depends on trust with LPs, founders, and counterparties, plus disciplined hiring, delegation, and specialized teams rather than generalist overreach.

Key Arguments: Venture is no longer a 10-year asset class; companies can now remain private for 20+ years, so liquidity has to come from secondaries and related structures. The real crisis in venture is not valuation, it is the lack of DPI; without distributions, LPs cannot meet expectations or reinvest efficiently. Private markets have become the default because they allow companies to iterate and pivot without public-market noise or activist pressure. Institutional buyers, not retail, are the main engine of modern secondary-market liquidity and pricing efficiency. Unauthorized retail SPVs and stacked intermediaries create legal, operational, and reputational risks that may trigger blowups and regulatory scrutiny. Continuation vehicles help GPs solve liquidity and fundraising issues by turning secondary-like transactions into DPI, while letting LPs choose between cashing out or rolling over. Trust is the most important currency in private markets; the best outcomes come from long-term, reliable behavior rather than merely chasing the best terms or returns. MVP’s differentiated role is not as a classic venture brand or pre-IPO platform, but as a liquidity and cap-table relief provider that preserves optionality for companies and LPs.

Data Points: AUM of Manhattan Venture Partners: roughly $3 billion - Current firm size discussed at the start of the interview Capital locked in venture funds past 10-year life: roughly $2.7 trillion - Jared’s estimate of stranded venture capital Recent IPO age examples: Klarna: 20 years old; SpaceX: 20+ years old; 24-year-old business referenced - Used to illustrate how long companies now stay private before exit Allocator Training Institute DPI model: 24% yearly DPI expected vs. 9% in 2024 and 9% in 2025 - Evidence that distributions are running far below historical assumptions Secondary transactions that are institutional: 92% institutional / 8% retail - Claim about who actually drives secondary-market activity MVP fund example: MVP All-Star Fund 3 included SpaceX as the last portfolio piece - Used to explain continuation/secondary flexibility for LPs Firm scale and staffing: 30-odd people - Current team size after scaling from a small founding team Business growth milestone: 2.8 billion AUM - Approximate growth figure referenced later in the discussion Longevity of family office relationship: almost 20 years in private equity funds; longest 18 years - Anecdote showing how long capital can remain locked up Career trajectory of early hires: at least 3 team members started as interns 11 years ago and are now principals - Illustrates internal development and low attrition

Pivotal Quotes: "The way we see it is that companies are now on this 20-year journey, but funds are positioned for 10 years." — Jared: Explaining the structural mismatch between company lifecycles and fund terms "DPI does. The power law in venture means that many GPs hold these massively overweight positions in late-stage companies." — Jared: Describing why LP expectations have shifted from IRR to cash distributions "I can keep you private as long as you need, and ultimately, so you don't end up in the hands of potentially those SPVs that were being called out." — Jared: Summarizing MVP’s value proposition as a cap-table pressure-release valve

Implications: Private markets will likely stay dominant, but liquidity tools, stricter cap-table controls, and more institutional secondary infrastructure will become central. Managers who can deliver DPI, trust, and orderly exits will outperform.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About How I Invest

How I Invest with David Weisburd is a podcast that interviews the world's leading institutional investors. Previous guests include The Ford Foundation, Northwestern University Endowment, CalPERS, Stepstone, and other top limited partners.

View all episodes from How I Invest