More or Less Behind the Statistics
More or Less Behind the Statistics

Education, Education, Education (and Immigration)

Tim Harford investigates some of the numbers in the news. This week: (00:32) The internet is abuzz with the claim that twenty-seven young migrants are hired for every British young person. We explore the truth behind this misleading claim. (08:40) Last year two nerds made a bet on our programme. Tho

Featured Speakers

BBC Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: This episode debunks a misleading claim about migrant and UK youth employment, explains Brexit-related labor shifts, assesses whether VAT on private schools changed enrollment, explores why Welsh pupils underperform on PISA, and examines controversy over a difficult A-level maths paper. Across segments, the show emphasizes careful use of data, distinction between headlines and underlying methods, and the limits of what the statistics can prove.

Main Topics: Debunking the '27 young migrants for every British youngster' claim (Priority: 5/5): The CSJ headline was shown to be mathematically and linguistically misleading: it compared net increases in payroll jobs by nationality rather than counting actual hires, ignored turnover, and omitted EU nationals entirely. Post-Brexit immigration and labor-market change (Priority: 4/5): An expert from the Migration Observatory explains how the post-Brexit system, plus crises and policy changes, produced large shifts in overall migration, including growth in work visas, students, and care-sector migration. VAT on private school fees and pupil numbers (Priority: 4/5): A pre-set bet on how much private school enrollment would fall after VAT was introduced is settled; the actual decline is close to the lower prediction, with some of the drop explained by demographics and transfers to special schools. Welsh literacy and PISA performance (Priority: 4/5): An education statistician discusses whether Welsh-language testing partly explains weaker PISA results in Wales, concluding language effects exist but do not explain all of the gap with England and the wider UK. The hard A-level maths paper controversy (Priority: 3/5): A maths educator explains why Edexcel Pure Maths Paper 1 felt unusually difficult, how awkward answers can trigger panic, and why grade boundaries may still stabilize outcomes despite student distress.

Key Arguments: The CSJ headline is misleading because it uses 'hired' to describe net job increases, not actual hires, and compares two aggregate changes rather than labor-market flows. The claim is also incomplete because it excludes EU nationals, whose number in work fell sharply over the same period, which changes the broader migration picture. A rise in non-EU payroll numbers does not automatically mean those workers are causing youth unemployment or NEET growth; the causal relationship is not established. The VAT on private schools produced a modest decline in pupil numbers, not the dramatic collapse some predicted. Much of the private-school decline is due to falling birth rates and demographic trends rather than VAT alone. Some pupils moved from mainstream private schools into private special schools, complicating the interpretation of sector-wide enrollment changes. In Wales, taking PISA in Welsh appears to depress scores somewhat, but language choice explains only part of the performance gap. Difficult exam papers can provoke panic and affect individual candidates even if grade boundaries ultimately normalize results. Modern A-level maths is perceived as harder than the pre-2018 specification, though top grades are still awarded at similar rates each year.

Data Points: Young UK nationals in work: 3.84 million to 3.85 million - CSJ payroll comparison from January 2020 to December 2025 Increase in young UK nationals in work: About 11,000 - Net change used by CSJ in the headline ratio Young non-EU nationals in work: 80,000 to 370,000 - CSJ payroll comparison over the same period Increase in young non-EU nationals in work: 290,000 - Used to produce the 27:1 ratio Headline ratio: 27 to 1 - CSJ claim: net additional young non-EU migrants versus young UK nationals since 2020 Young EU nationals in work: Nearly 240,000 to 63,000 - Decline ignored by the CSJ analysis Fall in young EU-national workers: More than 170,000 - Post-Brexit labor-market change NEET rate among young people: Just under 12% to just over 13% - Change over the last five years, according to a government report Youth employment rate: 55% to 51% - All nationalities combined, 2020 to 2025 Private school pupil numbers change: -5.6% - Actual fall after VAT introduction, according to DfE data Private school pupil count change: -33,000 - Total reduction over the last two years Government forecast of pupils leaving private schools: 14,000 - Predicted VAT-related exit by the time referenced in the segment VAT-adjusted private school exit: Around 22,000 - Headline fall adjusted for demographic change Mainstream private school decline estimate: About 43,100 - After accounting for special-school growth and Scotland, per guest calculation Growth in private special schools: 146 new special schools opened - Over the past 18 months Private special-school enrollment growth: Around 9,900 students - Sector increase noted as a transfer effect State-sector pupil numbers: Just under 2% fall - Used to argue that some private-school decline reflects broader demographic shrinkage Welsh PISA participation in Welsh: 17% - Share of pupils taking the test in Welsh PISA language adjustment effect: Around 10 PISA points - Estimated boost if Welsh-language disadvantage were adjusted for A-level maths reform year: 2018 - Current specification described as tougher after reform Previous peak A-level year mentioned: 1992 - Guest joked this was the apex of A-level difficulty

Pivotal Quotes: "It is indisputably the case that for every 27 net additional young non-EU migrants on payrolls since 2020, there was just one net additional young UK national." — Centre for Social Justice (quoted by Tim Harford): The CSJ defended its headline ratio despite criticism of its method and wording "That is not splitting hairs, that's using the English language." — Tim Harford: Reaction to the CSJ’s claim that critics were being overly precise about the word 'hired' "The fall, according to DFE data, was 5.6%. That’s pretty close to 5%. So you won, I think." — Sam Friedman: Resolution of the bet over the effect of VAT on private school enrollment

Implications: Listeners should be cautious of ratios built from selective time snapshots and mislabeled metrics. The episode shows that migration, school funding, and exam performance debates need context, proper denominators, and attention to confounders before drawing policy conclusions.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About More or Less Behind the Statistics

Tim Harford and the More or Less team try to make sense of the statistics which surround us. From BBC Radio 4

View all episodes from More or Less Behind the Statistics