Episode Summary
Executive Summary: The episode centers on three intertwined themes: Hillary Clinton’s lingering political relevance and possible 2020 ambitions, radical feminism’s influence on Democratic messaging, and Trump’s tendency to make politically damaging but crowd-pleasing remarks. Shapiro argues Clinton remains a weak but potentially revived candidate if Democrats lean into grievance politics, while condemning an anti-men Slate essay and a racist GOP ad. He also critiques media overreaction to Trump’s Gianforte comments.
Main Topics: Hillary Clinton’s political afterlife (Priority: 5/5): Shapiro argues Clinton remains a uniquely weak candidate but could still be revived by Democrats if they frame 2020 around grievance, sexism, and victimhood. He notes her relevance is tied to fundraising and media attention. Radical feminism and victimhood politics (Priority: 5/5): He dissects a Slate essay and a Washington Post advice-column scenario to argue that some feminist discourse has become openly anti-male, illiberal, and strategically useful for Democrats seeking a 'war on women' narrative. Trump’s rally remarks about Greg Gianforte (Priority: 5/5): Shapiro condemns Trump for praising body-slamming a reporter as politically and morally wrong, while also explaining why Trump’s performer style makes such unfiltered comments likely. Media overreaction and selective outrage (Priority: 4/5): He criticizes CNN, Joaquin Castro, and other media figures for using Trump’s comments to draw absurd links to Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s murder and for amplifying dishonest narratives. Race, identity, and intersectionality (Priority: 4/5): Shapiro discusses how the left ranks identities by perceived victimhood and uses examples like Elizabeth Warren’s DNA controversy to show how Democrats try to claim additional marginalized status. Mailbag on politics, marriage, religion, and governance (Priority: 3/5): The Q&A touches on potential Trump matchups, prison privatization, anti-Semitism, city vs. rural politics, congressional term limits, ROTC, and marriage expectations, tying them back to themes of responsibility and gratitude. Culture commentary and lighter segments (Priority: 3/5): He closes with praise for Elvis, a Nikki Haley roast of Elizabeth Warren, and condemnation of a racist Arkansas political ad and extreme MSNBC rhetoric from Steve Schmidt and Rosie O'Donnell.
Key Arguments: Hillary Clinton remains a disastrous candidate, but Democrats may still use her if they want a revenge-driven, anti-Trump turnout strategy built around sexism and grievance. Clinton’s survival in politics is linked to fundraising and relevance; when she fades, the money train dries up. Radical feminist rhetoric that depicts men as broadly dangerous or hateful is illiberal, socially corrosive, and not far from mainstream Democratic identity politics. Trump’s comments about Greg Gianforte body-slamming a reporter are morally wrong because violence against journalists is unacceptable, even if Trump’s style makes such comments typical. The media’s response to Trump is often so exaggerated that it becomes counterproductive and helps Trump politically. Identity politics on the left increasingly sorts people by victimhood status, encouraging people like Elizabeth Warren to seek additional marginalized labels beyond gender. Marriages and public life fail when people operate from entitlement and unrealistic expectations rather than gratitude and personal responsibility. Some of the most overheated anti-Trump commentary from the left is as absurd as the worst Trump rhetoric and undermines credibility. The racist Arkansas GOP ad and MSNBC guests’ slavery analogies demonstrate that political discourse is becoming more extreme and less disciplined across the board.
Data Points: Hillary Clinton popular vote margin in 2016: about 2.5 million votes - Shapiro notes Clinton still lost the Electoral College despite winning the popular vote by a large margin. Wisconsin Trump vote comparison: Trump won fewer votes in Wisconsin in 2016 than Mitt Romney won in 2012 - Used to argue Clinton was a uniquely weak candidate and turnout was unusually low for Democrats. Clinton Foundation donations: dropped precipitously after she was no longer running for president - Shapiro cites this as evidence that Clinton’s relevance is tied to political candidacy and fundraising. One in three: one in three American women experienced sexual violence in their lifetimes - Quoted from the Slate essay; Shapiro challenges the vagueness of the statistic and its use in the argument. 23andMe example: Elizabeth Warren is described as "one 1/1024th white" - Used satirically to discuss DNA/identity politics. Age reference: septuagenarian - Shapiro describes Bernie Sanders as a septuagenarian when discussing Clinton’s near-primary loss. Private/public prison growth: no government program has shrunk over time - Used in the mailbag response to argue government has growth incentives too. ROTC federal funding leverage: Solomon Amendment - Shapiro recommends using federal funding pressure if universities obstruct ROTC programs. Marriage workload example: wife had cooked only three meals in 10 years - Shapiro gives a personal example to illustrate gratitude and realistic expectations in marriage.
Pivotal Quotes: "Hillary Clinton is the worst candidate in the history of American politics." — Ben Shapiro: Shapiro’s central argument about Clinton’s enduring weakness despite Democrats considering her a possible comeback figure. "Men are bad. Men are evil. Solid political argument." — Ben Shapiro: His mockery of the Slate essay arguing women should reclaim the phrase 'man-hating dyke' in the Me Too era. "I had heard that he body-slammed a reporter. And he was way up. And I said, oh, this was like the day of the election or just before. And I said, oh, this is terrible. He's going to lose the election. Then I said, well, wait a minute. I know Montana pretty well. I think it might help him. And it did." — Donald Trump: The rally remark Shapiro criticizes as encouraging violence against reporters and politically stupid.
Implications: The episode argues that grievance politics, media hyperbole, and unfiltered populism are mutually reinforcing forces shaping 2020-era politics. Shapiro warns that Democrats may overplay identity politics while Trump’s rhetorical excess remains a self-inflicted vulnerability.
About The Ben Shapiro Show
Tired of the lies? Tired of the spin? Are you ready to hear the hard-hitting truth in comprehensive, conservative, principled fashion? The Ben Shapiro Show brings you all the news you need to know in the most fast moving daily program in America. Ben brutally breaks down the culture and never gives an inch! Monday thru Friday.