Deep Questions with Cal Newport
Deep Questions with Cal Newport

Ep. 66: Habit Tune-Up: Bullet Journaling vs. Trello

Below are the topics covered in today's mini-episode (with timestamps). For instructions on submitting your own questions, go to calnewport.com/podcast.- Taking notes in meetings. [3:41]- Switching from Bullet Journal to Trello. [8:42]- Speeding up time blocking. [13:56]- Scheduling daily tasks

Featured Speakers

Cal Newport Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Cal Newport answers listener questions on optimizing productivity systems. He recommends full capture and quick processing after meetings, argues for a hybrid analog-digital workflow based on task complexity, simplifies weekly vs. daily time-block planning, and advises judging writing work by output quality and long-term vision rather than by how hard it feels. He also reiterates practical rules for using YouTube safely.

Main Topics: Meeting note-taking and post-meeting processing (Priority: 5/5): Notes in meetings should capture every obligation, including ambiguous requests, so nothing stays only in the head. The real productivity win comes from processing those notes soon after the meeting, ideally within 15-20 minutes. Analog vs. digital productivity systems (Priority: 5/5): New productivity tools should be chosen based on workload complexity. Analog systems like bullet journals can be ideal for simpler lives, while digital tools like Trello become more useful as task volume and mutability increase. Weekly planning vs. daily time blocking (Priority: 5/5): Time-consuming planning should happen in a weekly session, not every day. Daily time blocking should mostly copy calendar items, add deep-work blocks, and fill leftover time with generic admin blocks. Trello board design and avoiding over-granularity (Priority: 4/5): A separate 'try to do today' list is probably unnecessary. Important tasks should move to the calendar; remaining tasks can be handled through admin blocks and weekly task lists without excessive board complexity. Choosing writing work based on output and vision (Priority: 4/5): Hardness alone should not determine whether a writer takes a job. The better test is whether the work produces high-quality output and fits the writer's larger career and deep-life goals. Using YouTube as a library, not a channel (Priority: 3/5): YouTube can be useful for looking up specific videos or tutorials, but it becomes harmful when used as an open-ended entertainment feed. Recommendations and distractions should be blocked or avoided.

Key Arguments: Meeting notes should achieve 'full capture' so every obligation is recorded somewhere outside the mind. Ambiguous tasks should still be captured immediately, even if they are not yet fully defined; clarification can happen later. Every meeting should be followed by 15-20 minutes of processing time to clarify, organize, and assign captured items. Digital tools are superior for fast entry, flexible reorganization, and attachments; analog tools reduce digital distraction and can still work well for moderate workloads. A bullet journal is often enough for freelancers or people with fewer obligations, but Trello or similar tools make more sense as complexity grows. Daily time-block planning should be quick because most of the thinking should be done in a weekly planning session. Important or time-sensitive tasks should often be placed directly on the calendar rather than left as ambiguous daily to-dos. A 'try to do today' Trello column adds unnecessary complexity; use calendar blocks, admin blocks, and weekly lists instead. In writing, difficulty is not the main criterion; quality of output and alignment with career vision matter more. YouTube is dangerous when used as a passive entertainment channel, but useful when treated as a search-based video library.

Data Points: Meeting processing buffer: 15-20 minutes - Recommended time after each meeting to process notes and convert them into systems Weekly planning session length: 1 hour to 90 minutes - Suggested time for the more thorough planning session that feeds daily time blocking Daily time-block planning time: About 10 minutes - Desired amount of time to build a daily time block once weekly planning is done Book release date: March 2nd - Announcement for Cal Newport's upcoming book, A World Without Email Video rollout timing: Starting in February - Planned start for posting video of deep dives and select questions Magic Spoon nutrition claim: Zero sugar - Sponsor description of cereal nutrition Magic Spoon nutrition claim: 11 grams of protein - Sponsor description of cereal nutrition Magic Spoon nutrition claim: 3 net grams of carbs - Sponsor description of cereal nutrition MyBodyTutor discount: $50 off first month - Offer for listeners who mention Deep Questions Four Sigmatic discount: Up to 40% off and free shipping - Listener-exclusive offer on mushroom coffee bundles

Pivotal Quotes: "Your head should be clear." — Cal Newport: Explaining the goal of meeting notes: no obligation should live only in memory after the meeting "YouTube can be a library or it can be a channel." — Cal Newport: Distinguishing productive lookup use from addictive entertainment use "I care instead about two things. How good is the quality of the output? And how does that type of writing fit into a larger plan you have for your own deep life?" — Cal Newport: Answering the question about whether to avoid harder writing genres

Implications: Listeners should simplify systems around clarity and throughput: capture everything, process quickly, plan weekly, and keep daily execution lean. The episode favors tool choice and work selection based on fit, quality, and intent rather than habit, habit-formality, or momentary effort.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Deep Questions with Cal Newport

View all episodes from Deep Questions with Cal Newport