BG2Pod
BG2Pod

Ep7. The Great IPO Debate, Tesla Robotaxi vs. Uber, & Tech Check | BG2 with Bill Gurley & Brad Gerstner

Open Source bi-weekly convo w/ Bill Gurley and Brad Gerstner on all things tech, markets, investing & capitalism. This week, they discuss The Great IPO Debate, Tesla Robotaxi vs. Uber, and a Tech Check. Enjoy another episode of Bg2. Timestamps: (00:00) Introduction + Eclipse (01:56) The Great IP

Featured Speakers

Brad Gerstner and Bill Gurley Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The conversation centers on two structural shifts in markets: fewer companies are going public because private capital is abundant and public-company burdens are high, and autonomous vehicles may reshape ride-sharing economics but likely not destroy Uber if Tesla and others need hybrid distribution and demand management. The hosts also review a mixed macro backdrop and heading-into-earnings setup, with AI-driven cloud acceleration and margin expansion supporting large tech, while rates and volatility remain a risk.

Main Topics: Why fewer companies are going public (Priority: 5/5): The hosts debate whether IPO thresholds have permanently risen, arguing that abundant private capital, regulatory/litigation burdens, and public-market stigma keep many strong companies private longer. What size/growth profile can IPO today (Priority: 5/5): They contrast views that companies need $700M-$1B in revenue to go public with banker feedback suggesting $200M-$300M revenue, ~50% growth, and strong unit economics can be enough. Private-market liquidity and adverse selection (Priority: 4/5): They argue that the best companies can stay private via secondaries and late-stage capital, leaving the public markets with lower-quality or delayed issuers and creating LP liquidity issues. Autonomous vehicles vs. Uber (Priority: 5/5): They assess how Tesla RoboTaxi and Waymo could compete with Uber, concluding that network effects, demand spikiness, insurance, and fleet economics make full disruption difficult. Unit economics of robot fleets (Priority: 4/5): The discussion breaks down cost structure, utilization challenges, insurance, and the need for peak-demand management, suggesting AV fleets need a hybrid model to scale profitably. Macro backdrop and earnings setup (Priority: 4/5): They note rising rates, inflation, geopolitical risk, and election volatility, but see AI-driven revenue acceleration and margin expansion as supportive for large-cap tech into earnings season.

Key Arguments: Public-company economics have worsened because many firms can now raise capital privately without the scrutiny, litigation, and governance costs of being public. IPO thresholds are not fixed; strong companies with $200M-$300M revenue and ~50% growth can still be viable public candidates if unit economics are strong. A company with $100M revenue and 10% growth is not meaningfully better off private than public; hiding from market marks just delays reality. The best private companies may avoid public markets, causing adverse selection and leaving LPs/endowments with illiquid positions and delayed mark-to-market resets. Waymo-like owned fleets face a peak-versus-average utilization problem that makes unit economics hard without very high capital intensity or demand sharing. Tesla may have a structural advantage because it can leverage customer-owned vehicles and brand loyalty rather than funding an entirely owned fleet. Uber’s network effects and surge pricing make it hard to undercut at scale, especially if AV providers need to partner with Uber to flatten demand. AI is driving margin expansion and cloud acceleration, creating a favorable setup for large tech earnings even as rates rise and small caps lag.

Data Points: U.S. public companies: down from about 6,500 to about 4,000 over 20 years - Used to illustrate the shrinking number of public companies in the U.S. Private equity-backed companies: up from 1,900 to over 11,000 - Jamie Dimon data cited to show growth in private-market depth OpenTable IPO revenue run-rate: $10 million per quarter / $40 million run rate - Example of a much earlier, smaller IPO than today’s norms Suggested IPO bar: $200M-$300M revenue - Banker view on the revenue range needed for a reasonable IPO today Typical growth rate for IPO bar: around 50% - Banker view on growth needed for public-market appeal Target public-market valuation: $2B-$2.5B market cap - Banker estimate for a viable IPO size and investor float IPO float size: $200M-$250M - Banker estimate of the offering size needed for liquidity Public-company cost: $2M-$5M per year - Estimated annual cost of being public, including regulation and litigation-related expenses Instacart peak valuation: almost $40B - Illustrates high private-market marks during 2021 Instacart IPO valuation: around $6B - Shows the reset needed to go public Companies marked over $1B: over 1,000 - Describes the backlog of private companies needing to work through the system Tesla workforce reduction: 14,000 employees, about 10% - Cited as a sign of weak car demand and restructuring S&P 500 and Nasdaq YTD: up about 6% - Market performance heading into earnings season Small caps YTD: down about 3% - Highlights weak performance outside large tech 10-year Treasury yield: up from 3.9% to 4.7% - Used to explain pressure on growth multiples Hyperscaler cloud revenue additions: trend line improving and expected to rise above trend - Refers to AWS, Microsoft, and Google demand acceleration Autonomous vehicle insurance cost in Uber US case: about 5% of gross revenue - Estimate of insurance as a major operating expense Uber revenue per car: about $140,000 GBV per car - Estimated blended revenue on the Uber network AV revenue per car: about $100,000 GBV per car - Estimated revenue per self-driving vehicle, assuming lower consumer pricing and more competition Driverless revenue per car: about $90,000 per car vs. $40,000 with a driver - Illustrates revenue uplift but not necessarily profit uplift Margin estimate for Uber-like model: 7% of gross bookings - Baseline margin in the current driver-based model Margin estimate for AV model: 12%-14% of gross bookings - Projected margin after removing drivers but adding new costs Car insurance CPI increase: 22% year over year - Example of how insurance inflation is affecting consumers and economics Waymo fleet cost: about $150,000 per car - Used to argue that current AV fleet economics are far too capital intensive Potential low-cost Tesla fleet car: $25K-$30K - Needed for a more viable autonomous ride-sharing model

Pivotal Quotes: "If you're public with $100 million in revenue and a 10% growth rate, your valuation's not going to be all that great. But guess what? If you're private at $100 million in revenue with a 10% growth rate, it's not like you're better off." — Brad: Arguing that private-market status does not solve weak business fundamentals "The IPO window is wide open. It's just a matter of price." — Brad: Claiming the market can absorb IPOs if valuation expectations reset "There’s no hiding from whatever fair value is for these businesses." — Brad: Explaining that companies must eventually confront market pricing whether public or private

Implications: Expect more delayed IPOs, more secondaries, and more companies forced to reset valuations. In AV, Tesla may expand the market, but Uber likely remains central unless fleets solve capital, insurance, and peak-demand economics.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About BG2Pod

Open Source bi-weekly conversation with Brad Gerstner (@altcap) and Bill Gurley (@bgurley) on all things tech, markets, investing and capitalism

View all episodes from BG2Pod