Inside Economics
Inside Economics

“Fed” Up with the Jobs Report

Jon Hilsenrath, former journalist at the Wall Street Journal, joins the Inside Economics crew to discuss the December jobs report and the Fed. The team breaks down the latest employment data and debates whether the report is “fine” or “anemic”. The focus then shifts to the Fed for a wide-ranging con

Featured Speakers

Moody's Analytics Host

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode dissects a weak December jobs report showing only 50,000 payroll gains, with growth concentrated in healthcare while most other private-sector hiring softened or turned negative. Guests debate whether labor-market weakness is demand- or supply-driven, and whether the Fed is done cutting rates. The conversation broadens into Fed communication, independence, possible leadership changes, and the risk that fiscal and political pressures keep inflation and long-term yields higher.

Main Topics: December jobs report: weak headline, narrow hiring (Priority: 5/5): Payroll growth was only 50,000, with healthcare and leisure/hospitality driving gains while retail, construction, and manufacturing fell. Speakers agree the report confirms a soft labor market rather than signaling collapse or improvement. Household survey and unemployment rate (Priority: 5/5): The unemployment rate fell to 4.4%, but partly because the labor force shrank and participation declined. The panel views the labor market as softened, with some support from employment gains but persistent deterioration over the year. Structural explanations: Liberation Day, immigration, and AI (Priority: 4/5): Panelists connect weak job growth to trade/tariff disruption after Liberation Day, weaker labor-force growth from immigration changes, and longer-run pressure from technology and AI reducing demand for labor. Fed communication and transparency (Priority: 4/5): John Hislop explains how Fed communication has evolved from Greenspan-era opacity to post-crisis forward guidance. He argues future leadership may move toward more obscure messaging. Fed policy outlook and leadership transition (Priority: 5/5): The discussion turns to whether the Fed will cut again. One view is that 4.4%-4.5% unemployment is a threshold that ends Powell-era cuts; another expects cuts in 2026 under a new chair, likely Kevin Hassett, amid political pressure. Fed independence, political pressure, and market discipline (Priority: 5/5): The panel worries that Fed independence is already compromised by nomination politics, public pressure, and Treasury/fiscal actions. Market discipline and bond-market reactions are seen as the main constraints on policy overreach. Long-term rates, inflation, and the end of disinflation (Priority: 4/5): Hislop argues that the long disinflation era is over and equilibrium rates should be higher, with 10-year yields around 4%-4.5% and inflation more likely near 3% than 2%.

Key Arguments: Payroll gains of 50,000 are weak but not disastrous; the report mainly confirms a soft labor market concentrated in healthcare. Private-sector employment outside healthcare has fallen sharply since April, implying that most job creation is coming from one sector. The decline in unemployment to 4.4% was partly driven by labor-force contraction, so the headline rate understates underlying weakness. Liberation Day and tariff uncertainty likely contributed to the abrupt slowdown in hiring after early 2025. Immigration-related labor-supply weakness may be keeping unemployment artificially lower than it would otherwise be. Fed communication has become much more transparent since Greenspan, but future leadership may reverse that trend. Under Powell, rate cuts may be effectively over unless the labor market worsens materially or inflation falls faster than expected. Political influence on Fed appointments and public messaging has already begun to erode central-bank independence. Long-term interest rates should be anchored near nominal growth, which some speakers see closer to 4%-4.5%. The economy is being reshaped by technology and AI, which may reduce labor demand even if GDP remains decent.

Data Points: Headline payroll growth: 50,000 - December nonfarm payroll increase; described as weak but not alarming. Private-sector payroll growth: 37,000 - December private payroll gains, below headline due to government effects. 3-month average total payrolls: -22,000 - Distorted by October government job decline. 3-month average private payrolls: 29,000 - Average private-sector job growth in Q4 2025. Combined revision to prior two months: -76,000 - Downward revisions to the previous two months of payroll data. October government payroll change: -174,000 - Large government employment decline driving headline weakness in October. Retail trade jobs change: -25,000 - One of the larger December declines by industry. Construction jobs change: -11,000 - December decline by industry. Manufacturing jobs change: -8,000 - December decline by industry. Hourly earnings monthly change: 0.3% - Rebound in December after a weak November reading. Hourly earnings YoY growth: 3.8% - Wage growth described as roughly stable in the 4% range over recent years. Unemployment rate: 4.4% - December household survey; revised down from 4.6% initially reported for November. Unemployment rate in September: 4.4% - Shows unemployment has essentially been unchanged since September. Unemployment rate at start of year: 4.0% - Illustrates deterioration over the year. Labor force participation: Fell - One reason the unemployment rate declined. Job gains share in 2025 through April: 84% - Most 2025 employment gains occurred in the first four months. Healthcare jobs added in 2025: 713,000 - Almost all private-sector gains came from healthcare. Total private-sector jobs added in 2025: 733,000 - Shows healthcare accounted for nearly all private job growth. Private sector ex-healthcare employment since April: -147,200 - Key stat showing job losses outside healthcare over the last eight months. Unemployment rate for college educated: 2.8% - Used to suggest weakness is concentrated among college-educated workers. Median Fed funds rate over 70 years: 4.325% - Historical benchmark cited to argue policy is not currently highly restrictive. Greenspan-era median Fed funds rate: 3.1% - Used to compare modern-era policy levels. Nominal GDP YoY in Q3: 5.4% - Cited as evidence of strong nominal growth and possible inflation pressure. Real GDP underlying growth estimate: ~2% - Used to argue nominal growth is supported by inflation and/or productivity. Potential long-run 10-year yield range: 4.0% to 4.5% - Speaker’s equilibrium estimate for long-term rates. Projected short-term inflation target range: 2.5% to 3.0% - Suggested as the de facto short-term inflation objective under new leadership. Potential Fed funds rate after cuts: ~3% - Longer-run expectation in the discussion of yield curve normalization.

Pivotal Quotes: "Nothing to see here. Move along." — John Hislner: Reaction to the weak jobs report from a Fed perspective. "I would characterize the labor market as in a state of intensifying disruption." — Marissa DiNatali: Summary of labor-market conditions, emphasizing supply-side and technology-driven changes. "The Fed's independence is already compromised." — John Hislner: His assessment of political pressure and the erosion of central-bank autonomy.

Implications: Listeners should expect continued labor-market softness, narrow job creation, and a likely policy fight over Fed cuts and independence. If political pressure rises and inflation stays sticky, long-term yields and inflation expectations may drift higher.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Inside Economics

Join Chief Economist Mark Zandi, Marisa DiNatale and Cristian deRitis as they discuss key indicators and other aspects of the global economy. Contact us at [email protected]. Visit online at www.economy.com/economicview

View all episodes from Inside Economics