More or Less Behind the Statistics
More or Less Behind the Statistics

Fertility rates: baby boom or bust?

Under lockdown, couples were destined to find themselves closer than ever before, but despite what you’d think – this didn’t result in a higher birth rate. In fact in developed countries across the world the birth rate is falling, we spoke to Professor Marina Adshade about why this is and what this

Featured Speakers

BBC HostMarina Adshade Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode examines global fertility decline with economist Marina Adshade, challenging pandemic-era predictions of a baby boom. She argues falling birth rates are driven less by romance or lockdown habits and more by economics, uncertainty, and access to family support. The discussion highlights major declines in the US, China, and South Korea, and asks whether governments should worry less about population size than about people’s ability to have the children they want.

Main Topics: Pandemic baby-boom predictions vs. reality (Priority: 5/5): The programme revisits early COVID-19 predictions that lockdown intimacy would trigger a surge in births, and shows why that did not happen as expected. Why fertility rates are falling (Priority: 5/5): Adshade argues fertility decisions are shaped primarily by economic security, optimism about the future, and the cost/support structures around childrearing. Global decline in fertility rates (Priority: 5/5): The episode frames declining fertility as a broad international trend affecting the US, Europe, Asia, and other regions, with some countries reaching historically low levels. China’s demographic squeeze (Priority: 4/5): China’s low fertility rate is worsened by a shortage of women of childbearing age due to past sex-ratio distortions from the one-child era, prompting new pronatalist policy. South Korea’s record-low fertility (Priority: 4/5): South Korea is presented as the country with the world’s lowest fertility rate, now below one child per woman, with births falling below deaths. What governments should worry about (Priority: 5/5): Adshade rejects arguments that low fertility primarily threatens the economy or aging populations, and instead emphasizes reproductive choice and support for desired family size. Post-pandemic long-term demographic change (Priority: 4/5): The conversation ends by suggesting the pandemic may have accelerated a longer-term shift toward lower fertility and possibly more childlessness as a social norm.

Key Arguments: Fertility decline is not mainly caused by reduced sexual activity during lockdowns; it reflects deeper economic and social decision-making. People are less likely to have children when they feel uncertain about their finances and the future. Concerns that low fertility will immediately damage the economy are overstated because children only enter the workforce decades later. Low fertility cannot quickly solve aging-population problems because today’s children are dependents first, while the baby-boom cohort is already aging out. The real policy issue is whether adults can have the number of children they want, which depends on affordability, childcare, and work-life balance. China’s fertility rate understates its demographic challenge because the number of women of childbearing age is unusually low. South Korea’s fertility rate below one is an extreme demographic warning sign, with deaths already exceeding births. If childlessness becomes more socially normal after the pandemic, fertility could decline permanently rather than rebound.

Data Points: US total fertility rate: 1.64 - Cited as well below the replacement level of about 2.1 children per woman. Replacement fertility rate: About 2.1 children per woman - Threshold needed for a population to remain constant. Nigeria fertility rate: 5.25 - Example of a country where fertility is declining but remains high. China fertility rate: 1.34 - Highlighted as unusually low and possibly understating the demographic issue because of gender imbalance. South Korea fertility rate: Less than 1 - Described as the lowest in the world and still falling. South Korea projected fertility rate: 0.7 by 2024 - Latest projection mentioned during the discussion. Workforce entry lag: 20-25 years - Adshade notes children born today will not contribute economically for roughly two decades or more. Policy shift in China: One-child to two-child to three-child policy - Used to illustrate the government’s increasingly aggressive response to low fertility.

Pivotal Quotes: "I think that the idea that the reason people weren't having children is because they apparently didn't have time to get busy. I don't think that was the cause." — Marina Adshade: Explaining why the pandemic was unlikely to create a baby boom. "I actually think the only thing that we should be concerned about is whether or not people are able to have the number of children they want to have." — Marina Adshade: Summing up her view of the real policy concern behind falling fertility rates. "Korea has the lowest fertility rate in the world. It's less than one. It is astonishing." — Marina Adshade: Describing South Korea’s extreme demographic situation.

Implications: The episode suggests policymakers should focus on childcare, affordability, and family support rather than fearing population decline itself. Fertility may stay low or fall further if childlessness becomes normalized after the pandemic.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About More or Less Behind the Statistics

Tim Harford and the More or Less team try to make sense of the statistics which surround us. From BBC Radio 4

View all episodes from More or Less Behind the Statistics