The Vergecast
The Vergecast

Fornite kicked off the App Store and Microsoft’s Surface Duo arrives on Sept 10th

Nilay, Dieter, Tom, and Dan discuss the timeline of events that lead to Epic Games suing Apple and Google after being kicked out of mobile app stores. They also discuss Microsoft's announcement of the Surface Duo's release date and technical specs. Stories discussed this episode: Big Tech

Featured Speakers

Vox Media Podcast Network Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode centers on Epic’s coordinated antitrust offensive against Apple and Google, framed by Apple’s crackdown on game streaming services like xCloud and Facebook Gaming. The hosts unpack the legal theories around market definition, ecosystem lock-in, and app-store power, then pivot to Microsoft’s Surface Duo launch and what dual-screen hardware could mean for the future of mobile computing.

Main Topics: Epic vs. Apple antitrust strategy (Priority: 5/5): The hosts analyze Epic’s Fortnite-triggered lawsuit against Apple, including the 1984 parody video, the direct-payment discount, and the complaint’s focus on App Store control and in-app payments. Epic vs. Google and Android store power (Priority: 5/5): They compare Epic’s parallel lawsuit against Google, emphasizing Android’s openness in theory versus Google’s contractual and technical restrictions in practice. Game streaming and App Store policy (Priority: 5/5): A substantial segment covers Apple’s rejection of xCloud and Facebook Gaming, with debate over whether game streaming should be treated like Netflix-style video streaming or differently because of interactivity. Antitrust theory: market definition and lock-in (Priority: 4/5): The hosts explain how Epic defines the relevant markets, why consumer welfare and switching costs matter, and how these cases resemble earlier Microsoft tying/bundling disputes. Surface Duo and the future of foldables (Priority: 4/5): The conversation turns to Microsoft’s dual-screen Surface Duo, its high price, aging specs, software ambitions, and whether dual-screen mobile devices can become a meaningful new form factor. Android ecosystem and hardware partnerships (Priority: 3/5): They discuss Google Mobile Services, OEM preloads, Samsung’s role, and the emerging competition among Microsoft, Google, Samsung, and Apple around foldables and app ecosystems.

Key Arguments: Epic deliberately timed its Fortnite App Store violations to trigger removal and create a public and legal fight over platform control. Apple and Google justify restrictions as safety and review policies, but Epic argues those policies are used to preserve monopoly power and extract rent. Game streaming services challenge App Store rules because they separate the streaming platform from individual games, undermining Apple’s claim that it must review each game. Apple’s ecosystem creates high switching costs through app purchases, family sharing, and device integration, which weakens consumer discipline on App Store policy. Google’s Android openness is constrained by Google Mobile Services, device preloads, and contractual restrictions with OEMs, so sideloading is not truly frictionless competition. Epic’s lawsuits are structured to target tying and bundling through antitrust law, not to seek damages, but to force structural changes in app distribution. The Surface Duo represents a bet that dual screens can create a new mobile computing paradigm, even if the first-generation hardware is compromised. Both Apple and Google argue they deserve compensation for creating and maintaining the platform, while critics say their cuts are excessive given their market power.

Data Points: Weeks since Trump’s testing-plan announcement: 22 weeks - Referenced in the pandemic update as a recurring benchmark of inaction. U.S. coronavirus cases: 5 million - Mentioned as a grim pandemic milestone. Corporate racial-justice pledges: $1 billion - Jay Peters’s reporting on major tech and media companies’ pledges. AT&T ad spend on fake 5G campaign: $73 million - Cited to illustrate how small many racial-justice pledges look relative to other corporate spending. Apple App Store revenue share: 30% - Discussed as the standard cut Apple takes from many App Store transactions. Epic direct-purchase discount: 20% off V-Bucks - The Fortnite update offered a discount for buying directly from Epic instead of through in-app purchases. Google Play Store fee reference: 30% - Used in discussing standard store economics and the dispute over payment processing. Apple services narrative: Largest chunk is in-app purchases and games - The hosts argued that games are central to Apple’s services revenue story. Surface Duo price: $1,400 - The announced price sparked debate over whether the first-generation device is overpriced. Surface Duo processor: Snapdragon 855 - Presented as an older chip for a premium-priced device. XCloud iOS test games: 1 game - Microsoft’s iOS test reportedly included only Halo, while Android had many more titles. Android test library: Around 100 games - Microsoft’s earlier Android xCloud test had a much broader catalog. Fortnite frame rate on mobile: 90 frames per second - Used to show how powerful modern phones have become for gaming. Mobile device preloads: Up to 30 Google mandatory apps - Epic’s complaint said OEMs must place these apps on home screens or nearby screens. Google Play Store distribution agreement: Restricts app stores in the Play Store - Used to argue Google blocks the Epic Games Store from being distributed through Play. Samsung Store fee default: 30% - Discussed as the default cut Samsung offers, though deals may vary.

Pivotal Quotes: "Today, Epic Games took the unfortunate step of violating the App Store guidelines that are applied equally to every developer and designed to keep the store safe for our users." — Apple (statement read by host): Apple’s official explanation for removing Fortnite from the App Store. "For years, they have given us their songs, their labor, their dreams. In exchange, we have taken our tribute, our profits, our control." — Epic (1984 parody video): Epic’s promotional video reframing Apple as a monopolist and invoking Apple’s historic anti-establishment branding. "Apple’s power in the market is not disciplined by competition because consumers cannot account for and switch away from Apple’s anti-competitive conduct through their device purchasing behavior." — Narrated from Epic complaint: Core legal theory on lock-in and consumer switching costs.

Implications: The episode frames app stores as critical chokepoints for the next era of computing. If Epic’s cases gain traction, Apple and Google may face pressure to loosen payment and distribution rules, reshaping mobile software economics, gaming, and platform control.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About The Vergecast

The Vergecast is the flagship podcast from The Verge about small gadgets, Big Tech, and everything in between. Every Friday, hosts Nilay Patel and David Pierce hang out and make sense of the week’s most important technology news. And every Tuesday, David leads a selection of The Verge’s expert staffers in an exploration of how gadgets and software affect our lives – and which ones you should bring into yours.

View all episodes from The Vergecast