Episode Summary
Executive Summary: The episode centers on Perth Tolle’s Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and why a rules-based focus on freedom has outperformed broad emerging markets. The hosts frame FRDM’s surge as a “victory lap,” while Tolle explains that the strategy’s country selection, avoidance of authoritarian markets, and exposure to freer EMs like South Korea, Taiwan, Chile, and Poland drove results. The conversation also explores freedom metrics, populism, flow growth, and whether the same framework could extend to developed markets.
Main Topics: FRDM’s outperformance and recent asset growth (Priority: 5/5): The hosts highlight FRDM’s strong five-year returns and rapid inflows, positioning the episode as a review of why the fund has become a standout in emerging markets investing. Freedom-based index methodology (Priority: 5/5): Tolle explains that the ETF uses a systematic, rules-based index built from third-party freedom metrics and has changed very little since inception, emphasizing objectivity and discipline. Country selection vs. exclusion effects (Priority: 5/5): The discussion breaks down how much of performance came from avoiding unfree countries like China and Russia versus owning outperforming freer countries such as South Korea, Taiwan, Chile, and Poland. Freedom, authoritarianism, and personal credibility (Priority: 4/5): Tolle describes her experience in China and argues that her lived experience gives her credibility when criticizing autocracies and defending freedom of speech and media. Populism, democratic backsliding, and developed markets (Priority: 4/5): The hosts and Tolle discuss whether rising populism and policy interference in developed markets create a broader opportunity set for freedom-based investing beyond EMs. Investor behavior, tourism, and stickiness (Priority: 3/5): They debate whether recent flows are driven by performance chasing, diversification demand, or a “shiny object” effect, and why thematic conviction may help investors stay invested through drawdowns.
Key Arguments: FRDM’s outperformance is largely explained by systematic country selection rather than discretionary market timing. Avoiding countries that are less free, especially China and Russia, materially improved returns during periods of geopolitical and market stress. Freer emerging markets have outperformed because institutions, checks and balances, and civil society proved stronger than in less free peers. The methodology has remained stable, which supports credibility and keeps the strategy passive in implementation but active in idea selection. Freedom metrics are based on third-party data from Cato and Fraser across 87 variables, reducing subjective bias. Emerging-market countries near less free neighbors can benefit from migration and human capital inflows. The U.S. remains relatively free and would not be screened out, but its score may decline if government intervention in markets increases. Thematic strategies can help investors stick with a portfolio because they connect performance to a belief system, not just benchmark chasing.
Data Points: FRDM five-year return: 103% - Hosts compare FRDM’s performance over five years with broad emerging markets and other benchmarks. Emerging markets benchmark return (EEM): 20% - Used as the broad emerging-markets comparison over the same five-year period. Invesco QQQ return: 92% - Referenced by the hosts as a benchmark FRDM also beat over the period discussed. FRDM vs. EMXC: About 2x EMXC - Hosts note FRDM outperformed iShares’ emerging markets ex-China ETF as well. Country selection attribution: 83% to 84% - Tolle says country selection explains most of the strategy’s outperformance attribution. Freedom variables used: 87 - Cato Institute and Fraser Institute metrics feed into the index methodology. U.S. Human Freedom Index rank: 15 out of 165 - Tolle says the U.S. would not be excluded by the strategy. Top performers by year cited: South Korea, Taiwan, Poland, Chile - Tolle names successive top-performing freer EM countries over recent years. Assets under management: Almost $3 billion - Hosts describe FRDM’s rapid asset gathering and recent inflows. Recent weekly flows: $150 million to $300 million per week - Hosts describe accelerating inflows in the most recent weeks. Net redemption days: 0 for the first five years - Tolle says the fund had no net redemption days during its early years. Population comparison: India surpassed China - Tolle cites this as a demographic reason she remains bullish on India despite methodology-driven exclusions/inclusions.
Pivotal Quotes: "Freedom is not a trade, it is an investment." — Perth Tolle: Her summary of the long-term mindset behind the strategy and why investors should endure short-term underperformance. "The thing about AI for business: it may not automatically fit the way your business works." — IBM ad read: A sponsored segment inserted before the interview; not part of the core discussion but present in the transcript. "I think freedom of speech is important. Freedom of media is important." — Perth Tolle: Tolle explains why she speaks publicly about authoritarian countries and sees freedom as central to her framework.
Implications: The episode suggests freedom-based, rules-driven investing can outperform when geopolitical and institutional differences matter. It also signals potential demand for similar strategies in developed markets, while reminding investors that freedom is fragile and thematic conviction matters in drawdowns.
About Trillions
Money goes where it's treated best. That simple truth is a big reason why more and more money—trillions, in fact—flows into a powerful, low-cost tool that's quietly transformed investing in recent years. Exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, let you invest in everything from the stock market to gold like never before. This biweekly podcast will demystify them—and delight you in the process.