Episode Summary
Executive Summary: NewsGuard co-founder Gordon Krovitz defended the company as a transparent, apolitical ratings service for news sites and brand safety, not a fact-checker or censor. The discussion centered on accusations of liberal bias, government jawboning, ad-tech opacity, foreign disinformation, and how platform and regulator actions can distort the information ecosystem.
Main Topics: What NewsGuard Does (Priority: 5/5): Krovitz explained NewsGuard’s role: rating news and information websites using nine journalistic criteria such as corrections policies, ownership disclosure, and separation of news and opinion. Bias Accusations and Political Pressure (Priority: 5/5): He responded to claims from conservatives and FCC Chairman Brendan Carr that NewsGuard has left-wing bias or is part of a 'censorship cartel,' arguing those attacks are based on false claims and reflect attempts to suppress scrutiny. Brand Safety and Programmatic Advertising (Priority: 5/5): The conversation emphasized that advertisers need transparent tools to avoid having ads appear next to misinformation, with NewsGuard’s inclusion lists helping brands navigate opaque programmatic ad markets. Fact-Checking vs. Rating and Misinformation Tracking (Priority: 4/5): Krovitz distinguished NewsGuard’s ratings from fact-checking, while also describing its 'misinformation fingerprints' database that catalogs major false claims, especially from Russian, Chinese, and Iranian operations. Government Censorship and Section 230 (Priority: 4/5): Participants debated when government criticism becomes censorship, with Krovitz arguing that officials on both sides have engaged in improper jawboning and that private ratings should not be threatened with regulatory retaliation. Declining Trust in Media and Platform Responsibility (Priority: 4/5): The discussion linked broader distrust in media to social platforms’ indistinguishable treatment of reliable and unreliable sources and the failure of platforms to label or contextualize foreign propaganda.
Key Arguments: NewsGuard is a transparent journalistic ratings system, not a censorship tool; publishers know their ratings and can respond or improve. The company uses nine criteria of basic journalistic practice and applies them across markets and ideologies. Conservative sites can score well; Krovitz cited examples like Fox News scoring above MSNBC and The Washington Examiner above The New York Times. Critics such as Newsmax allegedly spread falsehoods about NewsGuard, and government officials are relying on those falsehoods. Government officials have a history of censoring or jawboning when given the chance, regardless of party. The core business problem is ad-tech opacity: brands unknowingly fund misinformation across thousands of sites, and NewsGuard helps them avoid that. Programmatic ad buying makes advertisers vulnerable because campaigns can run across tens of thousands of websites with limited visibility. Foreign disinformation from Russia, China, and Iran is a major, under-addressed threat that social platforms have not adequately contained. NewsGuard’s transparency and publisher feedback loop are its main safeguards against error and bias. A major part of news distrust comes from social media making reliable and unreliable sources look the same to users. NewsGuard’s work is commercially viable because advertisers and ad-tech firms need inclusion lists and brand-safety tools. Criticism of NewsGuard should not be confused with legitimate debates over antitrust or Section 230 reform.
Data Points: Websites rated: 35,000 - Total sources NewsGuard says it has rated across its system. Journalistic criteria: 9 - Number of basic standards NewsGuard uses to assess websites. Publisher engagement: More than 20% - Share of rated websites that engaged with analysts and improved disclosure or rating. Markets served: 9 - Countries/markets where NewsGuard applies its standards. Browser extension price: $4.95/month - U.S. monthly subscription price for NewsGuard’s browser extension. Programmatic ad campaign reach: 40,000 websites - Average number of websites an ad campaign may run on, illustrating opacity in digital advertising. Advertising share in newspapers and magazines: 60% in 1980 - Historic share of advertising revenue flowing to newspapers and magazines. Advertising share on news websites: 1.28% now - Current share of advertising running on news websites, according to Krovitz. Score gap example: About 50 points - Krovitz said Newsmax scores roughly 50 points below Fox News in NewsGuard’s system. Disinformation network size: 170 websites - Network of sites NewsGuard identified as Russian-disinformation-linked local-news clones.
Pivotal Quotes: "I do not know how a mid-sized private company can be a censor." — Gordon Krovitz: Response to accusations that NewsGuard is acting as a censorship cartel. "The bulk of our revenue is from enterprises, from companies that are trying to improve their trustworthiness by making sure that they're not associated with misinformation." — Gordon Krovitz: Explaining NewsGuard’s business model and demand for brand-safety tools. "Government officials will censor if they can. They will grab power if they can." — Gordon Krovitz: His broader warning about government jawboning and political interference in media.
Implications: The episode frames misinformation as a transparency and market-structure problem, not just a speech debate. It suggests future fights will center on ad-tech accountability, platform responsibility, and limits on government pressure over private ratings.
About Two Think Minimum
Podcast of the Technology Policy Institute of Was…