Macro Musings
Macro Musings

George Hall on the Fiscal Consequences of the US War on COVID

Check out David's Substack: Macroeconomic Policy Nexus for a special 500th episode post! George Hall is a professor of economics at Brandeis University and formerly worked as an economist at the Chicago Federal Reserve Bank. George returns to the show to discuss the current fiscal status of the

Featured Speakers

David Beckworth HostGeorge Hall Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Episode 500 features David Beckworth and George Hall on the fiscal aftermath of COVID and the U.S. government budget constraint. They argue debt burdens will be financed through some mix of spending restraint, taxes, and likely lower real returns to bondholders—meaning higher inflation or financial repression may become more important than official forecasts assume.

Main Topics: Milestone Episode and Podcast Context (Priority: 2/5): Beckworth opens by marking Macromusings episode 500 and framing the discussion around Hall and Sargent’s latest work on U.S. public finance and COVID’s fiscal legacy. Government Budget Constraint and Fiscal Financing (Priority: 5/5): Hall explains that government spending must be paid for through taxes, borrowing, or money creation, and that bonds and money can be partially turned into 'tax receipts' via low returns, inflation, or default-like erosion. COVID as a Fiscal War and Historical Comparisons (Priority: 5/5): The conversation treats COVID as a wartime-like shock and compares the U.S. to Britain and France historically, arguing the U.S. followed a British-style fiscal rule before 2000 but has looked more French-like since then. Inflation as Tax and Default (Priority: 5/5): Inflation is presented as both a revenue tool (seigniorage) and a mechanism for defaulting on government promises by reducing the real value of debt and money holdings. Fed-Treasury Interdependence and Fiscal Dominance (Priority: 5/5): The hosts discuss how monetary and fiscal policy are jointly constrained, with the Fed not truly independent if fiscal deficits become too large; higher rates can require higher primary surpluses or else be monetized. Debt Market Losses and Who Bears Them (Priority: 4/5): They review evidence that bondholders already took large losses during 2022-2024 and discuss how market value, not par value, reveals these fiscal costs. Distributional effects depend on who holds Treasuries and mortgage assets. Policy Outlook: Spending Cuts, Taxes, Inflation, or Financial Repression (Priority: 5/5): The likely path forward is framed as political tradeoffs among entitlement cuts, tax increases, lower bondholder returns, higher inflation, or possible financial repression such as reserve rule changes or yield-curve control.

Key Arguments: The consolidated government budget constraint must hold regardless of macroeconomic school; there is no free lunch in public finance. COVID functioned like a fiscal war: the government borrowed heavily, and the burden was absorbed partly through losses to bondholders rather than explicit taxes. The U.S. historical pattern was to run deficits in wars and surpluses afterward (the 'law of gravity'), but since 2000 the U.S. has increasingly failed to restore balance after shocks. Inflation is not just a price-level phenomenon; it can serve as a tax on money holders and a form of partial default on debt holders. The Fed and Treasury are interdependent; if fiscal policy does not generate sufficient primary surpluses, monetary policy may end up monetizing debt. The political system shows little appetite for materially higher taxes or entitlement cuts, making lower real returns to bondholders and inflation more likely adjustment channels. Bondholder losses are already visible in market-value terms, even if official accounting emphasizes par value and assumes 2% inflation and full repayment. The composition of Treasury holders matters: because debt is now widely held by foreigners, the Fed, and trust funds—not just domestic households—the political feedback from inflation may be weaker than in past episodes.

Data Points: Macromusings episode number: 500 - The host opens by celebrating the show’s 500th episode. Show start year: Early 2016 - Beckworth notes the podcast has been running since early 2016. U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio: Close to 100% - Used to motivate current fiscal pressure. CBO baseline deficit: $2 trillion per year - The host cites CBO projections for annual deficits. Added deficit from the 'one big, beautiful bill': $2 to $3 trillion over 10 years - Beckworth cites CBO, Tax Foundation, and Yale Budget Lab estimates. CBO baseline debt-to-GDP projection: 100% to 117% - Baseline projected path over the next decade. Debt-to-GDP under bill: Close to 130% - Estimated impact if the bill passes. Deficits, 2022-2024: About $2.6 trillion - Hall cites deficits over a three-year span. Bondholder losses, 2022-2024: $3 trillion - Hall says bondholders absorbed losses larger than deficits. Federal Reserve inflation target: 2% - CBO and many forecasters assume the Fed achieves this target. Post-COVID private domestic holdings of debt: About 45% - Hall explains the current ownership structure of U.S. debt. Foreign holdings of debt: About 25% - Part of the diversified holder base today. Fed holdings of debt: About 10-11% - Hall notes the Fed’s direct ownership share. Historical Treasury data coverage: Back to 1775 - Beckworth highlights Hall’s historical U.S. Treasury dataset. World War II yield on Treasury bills: 3/8% - Hall describes wartime yield-curve control settings. World War II yield on 30-year bonds: 2.5% - Hall describes the pegged long rate under yield-curve control. Inflation after World War II: 20% to 30% of debt wiped out - Hall says late-1940s inflation reduced the real debt burden substantially. Potential inflation scenario: 4% to 5% inflation - Hall says this is plausible in coming years if fiscal pressures persist.

Pivotal Quotes: "what the government spends, the public pays for" — George Hall: Core framing of the government budget constraint and fiscal burden. "we're going to have to break some promises" — George Hall: Hall’s summary of the coming fiscal tradeoffs among spending, taxes, and bondholder returns. "the fiscal authority says, well, we're only going to raise this much in taxes... the monetary authority could say... you're going to have to raise this revenue with taxes. And the question is, who blinks first?" — George Hall: Description of the fiscal-monetary 'game of chicken' under debt pressure.

Implications: Listeners should expect persistent fiscal pressure to shape inflation, rates, and Fed policy. If entitlement reform and tax hikes remain politically blocked, the adjustment may come through higher inflation, financial repression, or reduced real bondholder returns.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Macro Musings

Hosted by David Beckworth of the Mercatus Center, Macro Musings pulls back the curtain on the important macroeconomic issues of the past, present, and future.

View all episodes from Macro Musings