The Rational Reminder Podcast
The Rational Reminder Podcast

Hal Hershfield: The Psychology of Long-term Decision Making (EP.141)

How do your perceptions of time influence your long-term decision-making and financial well-being? Today we speak with psychologist and UCLA Associate Professor Hal Hershfield to answer this abstract question. We open our conversation with Hal by exploring the concept of well-being. After chatting a

Featured Speakers

Benjamin Felix, Cameron Passmore, and Dan Bortolotti HostHal Hershfield Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Hal Hershfield argues that well-being is shaped by how people relate to their future selves, their time, and their money. The conversation links psychology to finance: vivid future-self thinking, milestone birthdays, discretionary time, annuities, and spending beliefs all influence saving, satisfaction, and life decisions. The core message is that good financial advice should help people imagine and plan for the lives they actually want.

Main Topics: Defining and measuring well-being: Hershfield distinguishes life satisfaction, daily happiness, and financial well-being, emphasizing that these dimensions are related but not identical and are typically measured through self-report and survey ladders or happiness scales. Future self-connection and financial behavior: The discussion explores how feeling psychologically close to one’s future self encourages saving and other future-oriented decisions, while vividness-enhancing exercises like letter writing or age progression can strengthen that connection. Present vs. future time perception: Hershfield explains that subjective beliefs about when the present ends and the future begins affect behavior: people who feel the future starts sooner are more likely to make future-oriented choices and enroll in helpful programs. Time scarcity, discretionary time, and happiness: The conversation covers a U-shaped relationship between discretionary time and well-being: too little time hurts life satisfaction, but too much time can also reduce well-being unless people use it productively. Money vs. time preferences and well-being: Asked whether people prefer more time or more money, Hershfield says most choose money, but those who want more time tend to be happier. He argues that how time and money are used matters more than the raw amount. Retirement, annuities, and framing: The discussion explains why lump sums can feel deceptively large versus annuitized income streams, and why framing retirement products in spending terms can make them more psychologically intuitive and valuable. Milestone birthdays and meaning-seeking: Hershfield describes research showing that approaching decade birthdays prompts reflection and can trigger both positive meaning-seeking behaviors and darker outcomes, illustrating how life transitions affect decision-making.

Key Arguments: Well-being is multifaceted: life satisfaction, happiness, and financial well-being overlap but should be measured separately because each predicts different outcomes. Feeling connected to one’s future self is associated with better financial behavior, including saving and planning, and may also predict higher later life satisfaction. The key intervention is not to erase the distinction between present and future selves, but to make the future self vivid enough that people feel responsibility toward it. Subjective time perception matters: people who believe the future starts sooner are more future-oriented and respond better to messaging that highlights imminent future consequences. Having too little discretionary time lowers life satisfaction, but more time is not automatically better; the quality and productivity of time use are what matter. Most people say they want more money than more time, yet preferring more time is associated with higher happiness even after controlling for income, education, age, gender, and materialism. Financial advice should start with identifying what a person actually wants their life to look like before setting savings or retirement targets; goals without life context may be hollow. Annuities are psychologically easier to understand when framed as reliable monthly spending power rather than as an investment product or lump-sum withdrawal decision. Milestone birthdays can serve as external prompts to reflect on life meaning, which may lead to constructive changes, but can also produce distress or withdrawal. People often mistakenly infer wealth from spending; believing that spending implies wealth is linked to greater financial vulnerability and lower financial well-being.

Data Points: Preferred resource: About two-thirds of respondents preferred more money over more time. - Survey work on tradeoffs between time and money. Similarity to future self and later satisfaction: Perceived similarity between 1995 and 2005 selves predicted higher life satisfaction 10 years later, even controlling for baseline satisfaction. - Longitudinal study of midlife adults. Time perception intervention: Messages saying the present ends sooner produced more enrollment in a financial well-being course than messages implying the present lasts longer. - UCLA campus messaging experiment. Discretionary time pattern: U-shaped relationship. - Too little discretionary time reduces life satisfaction; too much can also reduce well-being unless used productively. Searching for meaning near milestone birthdays: Small uptick before decade-turning ages. - World Values Survey analysis of people at ages ending in 9. First marathon participation: Uptick before milestone birthdays. - Behavioral evidence of meaning-seeking near age transitions. Ashley Madison use: Slight uptick before milestone birthdays. - Potential darker side of reflection around major age markers. Suicide rates: Very slight upticks around milestone birthdays. - Observed in a 10-year data window, suggesting some negative effects of reflection. Financial well-being response: Higher propensity to plan and feeling identified with one’s future self were positively related to financial well-being. - Psychological correlates from Hershfield’s research. Future-self vividness tools: Letter writing, conversation, age progression, apps like Snapchat/FaceApp. - Methods discussed to make the future self feel more concrete.

Pivotal Quotes: "I think of these concepts as being related. You know, it's hard to have global well-being without also having financial well-being." — Hal Hershfield: Defining well-being and explaining its connection to finances. "If I feel connected to my future self, then I tend to do better when it comes to financial well-being." — Hal Hershfield: Explaining the psychological antecedents of financial behavior. "I think success means having the time and resources to be able to spend my time the way that I want to." — Hal Hershfield: Closing reflection on how he defines success personally.

Implications: For advisors and listeners, the takeaway is to frame decisions around lived goals, not just numbers. Make future selves vivid, respect changing preferences, optimize time use, and present financial products in terms of real-life spending and well-being.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About The Rational Reminder Podcast

A weekly reality check on sensible investing and financial decision-making, from three Canadians. Hosted by Benjamin Felix, Cameron Passmore, and Dan Bortolotti, Portfolio Managers at PWL Capital.

View all episodes from The Rational Reminder Podcast