Intelligence Squared
Intelligence Squared

History vs Herstory

In this archive episode from 2021, we hear from a panel of historians, authors and broadcasters – Hallie Rubenhold, Natalie Livingstone, Dan Jones and chair Saul David – about how women's stories and female historians have been marginalised throughout history. The conversation recorded at The C

Featured Speakers

Haley Rubenhold GuestDan Jones Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: A 2021 Cliveden Literary Festival panel examined how women have been marginalized in history and how historians can broaden the field without flattening the past. Saul David, Haley Rubenhold, Dan Jones, and Natalie Livingstone debated sources, class, audience expectations, and the purpose of history, agreeing that women’s stories matter while differing on how radically history should be rethought.

Main Topics: Women’s marginalization in historical narratives (Priority: 5/5): Panelists argued that history has often privileged elite men, especially white men, while women’s experiences were excluded unless they were queens or otherwise exceptional figures. What history is for (Priority: 5/5): The discussion moved beyond gender to question the purpose of history: storytelling, social therapy, civic cohesion, and understanding the human experience. Sources, archives, and the limits of evidence (Priority: 5/5): Speakers explored how the availability, preservation, and digitization of records shape what can be written, and how historians reconstruct marginalized lives from fragmentary evidence. Commercial realities and audience demand (Priority: 4/5): Dan Jones and Saul David emphasized that publishers, broadcasters, and audiences still drive demand for traditional male-centered war stories, while also increasingly rewarding women’s histories. Reframing military and war history (Priority: 4/5): Saul David argued that even military history must account for civilians, women, and postwar consequences, showing war as a whole-society experience rather than only battlefield action. Storytelling, accessibility, and relevance (Priority: 4/5): Several speakers said history must be told as compelling human stories to engage wider audiences, especially students and readers who do not see the relevance of conventional political or military history.

Key Arguments: History has traditionally been defined by the deeds of great men, particularly elite white men, which leaves out most human experience. Women are often absent from the archive not only because of bias, but because records were neglected, never catalogued, or deliberately excluded. Digitization and lateral research methods now allow historians to reconstruct lives from censuses, ledgers, parish records, and other indirect sources. Military history should include civilians, families, and the aftermath of war, not just soldiers and battles. History functions as storytelling, social memory, and a means of connecting present society to the past. Audiences still like familiar stories, so historians and producers often need to balance innovation with recognizable historical touchpoints. There is room for both traditional male-centered narratives and broader, more inclusive histories; the field should expand rather than simply replace one canon with another. Historians should avoid forcing modern values onto the past, but they also should not use sparse evidence as an excuse to ignore women’s lives.

Data Points: Year of festival discussion: 2021 - The Intelligence Squared episode revisits a Cliveden Literary Festival panel from 2021. Estimated deaths in the Indian Mutiny: at least 1 million, possibly more - Saul David referenced the likely scale of civilian casualties in the 1857 conflict. Number of main figures in the Indian War of Independence cited: 4 - Saul David said the Rani of Jhansi is one of the four great heroes in India’s remembrance of the conflict. Book title count referenced by Saul David: 2 recent examples - He discussed Crucible of Hell and his upcoming Pacific war book as examples of broadening military history. Women in Rothschild founding exclusion year: 1812 - Natalie Livingstone said the dynasty’s founding father excluded women from the bank and relegated them to footnotes. Panelists named: 4 - Saul David, Haley Rubenhold, Dan Jones, and Natalie Livingstone participated in the discussion. Television viewing comparison mentioned: slightly worse than 'Building Britain's Canals' - Dan Jones joked that the Anne Boleyn drama’s overnights underperformed compared with another Channel 5 program. Festival audience described: about a thousand white men, mostly bald - Dan Jones described a historical event audience to illustrate the market for traditional war history.

Pivotal Quotes: "History should tell us what it means to be human." — Haley Rubenhold: Rubenhold argued for a broader, more inclusive definition of history focused on human experience. "History is a sort of therapy for society." — Dan Jones: Jones described history as socially useful, reflecting how present societies understand themselves. "The female experience has, for the most part, been written out unless the women are queens or leaders of some description." — Haley Rubenhold: Rubenhold explained how women’s perspectives are often absent from military and mainstream history.

Implications: The panel suggests history’s future lies in expansion, not replacement: keep popular narratives, but use better methods and broader framing to recover women, civilians, and other overlooked lives. For publishers and broadcasters, inclusivity is both a cultural imperative and a market opportunity.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Intelligence Squared

View all episodes from Intelligence Squared