Trillions
Trillions

Hot Takes: The Outlook for ETFs in 2020

There’s rarely a dull moment covering ETFs. And this year, as well as the past decade, was no exception. The industry has solidified itself as the hottest destination for new cash, new firms and new ideas. On this last episode of the year for Trillions, Joel and Eric talk to Rachel Evans of Bloomber

Featured Speakers

Bloomberg Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: This episode reviews the ETF landscape heading into 2020, emphasizing record fixed-income inflows, the ongoing fee war, the rise of smart beta, the mixed fortunes of thematic and ESG funds, and skepticism around ETF criticism. The guests argue that bond ETFs are entering a broader adoption phase, while active non-transparent ETFs and Bitcoin ETFs face major hurdles.

Main Topics: Fixed income ETFs take the lead in flows (Priority: 5/5): The discussion centers on fixed income ETFs outperforming equities in year-to-date flows, driven by falling rates and expanding use cases such as ladders, institutions, and hedging. ETF issuer competition and league table shifts (Priority: 4/5): BlackRock and Vanguard remain dominant, but firms like Schwab, Goldman Sachs, and DWS are highlighted as growing players, often by offering low-cost products and leveraging broader distribution platforms. Fee compression and the ongoing price war (Priority: 5/5): The hosts and guests argue the ETF fee war is far from over, citing zero-fee, negative-fee, and ultra-low-cost launches, plus fee pressure spreading into trading and advisory services. Smart beta's continuing appeal (Priority: 4/5): Smart beta is framed as a durable middle ground between passive and active, valued for rules-based, tax-efficient exposure with the possibility of modest outperformance and lower volatility. Thematic ETFs: strong narratives, uneven asset growth (Priority: 4/5): Thematic funds such as cannabis, robotics, gaming, and clean energy are praised for storytelling and specificity, but many have plateaued in assets and show highly divergent structures and outcomes. ESG investing: growth, ambiguity, and exclusions (Priority: 5/5): ESG demand is rising, but the segment faces questions about opaque scoring, exclusion lists, portfolio tradeoffs, and whether investors are willing to sacrifice exposure to major winners like Amazon or Berkshire Hathaway. Future products and industry scrutiny (Priority: 4/5): The conversation addresses active non-transparent ETFs, Bitcoin ETF odds, and broader skepticism about ETFs distorting markets, concluding that criticism is part of a maturing industry rather than a fatal flaw.

Key Arguments: Fixed income ETFs are having a breakthrough year and may be entering a long-term growth phase as investors use them more broadly for ladders, institutional portfolios, and hedging. ETF competition is increasingly won through scale and distribution, with large issuers and banks mimicking the Vanguard/iShares model by pairing cheap core products with higher-margin offerings. Fee compression is still unfolding across ETF wrappers, commissions, and advisor models, and will likely continue into the next decade. Smart beta has become a major ETF category because it offers a rules-based, tax-aware alternative that can improve risk-adjusted returns without fully abandoning index-like investing. Thematic ETFs are useful for storytelling and early exposure to trends, but asset growth is unstable and performance depends heavily on how narrowly or broadly the theme is defined. ESG funds face unresolved definitional and methodological issues; investors need to understand what is excluded and how ratings are constructed before assuming they are neutral substitutes for broad-market funds. Active non-transparent ETFs may struggle because active transparent ETFs already have limited adoption, low-fee expectations are high, and advisors often prefer known passive or mutual fund structures. ETF criticism about market distortion is overstated; market-wide price variation is driven by fundamentals and broad index ownership, not ETF wrappers alone.

Data Points: ETF industry assets: $4.2 trillion - Used by Rachel Evans to describe the scale of the ETF industry during the discussion of criticism and scrutiny. Fixed income ETF lead over equities: $14 billion - Todd Rosenbluth notes fixed income ETFs are ahead of equities in year-to-date inflows at the time of recording. Typical December equity inflow advantage: $35 billion more than fixed income - Eric Balchunas says equities usually beat fixed income by this amount in December, making the current bond lead notable. S&P 500 return in 2019: 25% - Referenced as evidence that the year was strong despite investor sentiment feeling otherwise. Smart beta share of ETF flows/assets: About 20% of the pie - The hosts describe smart beta as a substantial and lasting part of the ETF market. Thematic ETF assets: About $25 billion - Todd estimates the size of the thematic ETF complex. Number of thematic ETFs: About 120 products - Todd cites the approximate number of thematic-oriented ETFs in the market. Cannabis ETFs: 6 funds - Eric notes the rise in cannabis ETF count from one at the start of the year to six. ESG ETF assets: About $13 billion - Used in comparison to thematic ETFs to show ESG is large but still much smaller than smart beta. Large-cap quality ETFs count: 350 products - Eric uses this figure to argue there may be too many similar ETFs in some categories. Active transparent ETF share: 0.4% of total ETF assets - Eric cites this as evidence that active transparent ETFs have not gained broad traction. ETFs with less than $50 million AUM and over 3 years old: 175 ETFs - Todd mentions this as a potential culling universe of products that have had a fair chance but failed to gather assets. Fidelity ETF inflows in 2019: $3 billion - Todd points out Fidelity gathered this amount even before its flagship active equity strategies were available in ETF form.

Pivotal Quotes: "Fixed income ETFs have more money going in for the first time in a decade." — Todd Rosenbluth: Todd highlights the significance of bond ETF flows overtaking equities during a strong equity market. "The fee war is not even close to over." — Eric Balchunas: Eric pushes back against claims that ETF pricing competition has ended. "The more people talk about this, the more opportunities there are to educate about what are the real and what are the potentially not real risks out there." — Rachel Evans: Rachel frames ETF scrutiny and criticism as part of industry maturation and investor education.

Implications: Fixed income, low-cost distribution, and product transparency will shape ETF winners in the next decade. Expect more fee cuts, more consolidation, cautious growth in ESG/thematic funds, and hard tests for active non-transparent ETFs and crypto products.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Trillions

Money goes where it's treated best. That simple truth is a big reason why more and more money—trillions, in fact—flows into a powerful, low-cost tool that's quietly transformed investing in recent years. Exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, let you invest in everything from the stock market to gold like never before. This biweekly podcast will demystify them—and delight you in the process.

View all episodes from Trillions