Odd Lots
Odd Lots

How All Financial Markets Turned Into The Same Big Trade

These days it seems like all financial markets are the same big trade. A gold chart looks like a Tesla chart, which looks like an Ethereum chart, which looks like a chart of a basket of cloud computing stocks. So why is this? And what could cause that to change? On this episode, we speak with Jared

Featured Speakers

Bloomberg HostJared Woodard Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode argues that today’s markets are increasingly “one big trade,” where scarce growth and abundant liquidity push investors into a narrow set of winners: expensive growth stocks, speculative assets like crypto, and even safe havens like gold and Treasuries. Guest Jared Woodard says the key drivers are low growth, low rates, and policy, and that changes in accounting, fiscal/industrial policy, and Fed tolerance for inflation could eventually shift flows toward value and cyclical sectors.

Main Topics: Everything becoming one trade (Priority: 5/5): Joe, Tracy, and Jared Woodard discuss how assets as different as Tesla, Ethereum, gold, lumber, and Treasuries have been moving together, reflecting a market regime driven by liquidity and scarcity of growth. Scarce growth plus abundant liquidity (Priority: 5/5): Woodard explains that limited profit growth and ample liquidity cause investors to overbid assets with reliable cash flows while also buying speculative assets that could pay off in a future scenario. Value vs. growth and interest rates (Priority: 5/5): The conversation explores why growth stocks have outperformed value for a decade, and how low rates, low inflation expectations, and weak PMIs explain most of the spread. Intangible assets and modern valuation (Priority: 4/5): Woodard and the hosts debate whether traditional price-to-book and value models are outdated because they ignore intangibles like R&D, patents, brand, and workforce training. Policy as the real catalyst for regime change (Priority: 5/5): A major theme is that meaningful rotation away from growth stocks likely requires fiscal and industrial policy that boosts productivity, not just short-term monetary support. Inequality on Wall Street and Main Street (Priority: 4/5): The episode links asset-price divergence to broader inequality: concentrated profits in a few firms, stagnant broad corporate profits, and rising difficulty for median households to thrive. Portfolio adjustments investors can make now (Priority: 4/5): Woodard outlines practical tweaks: include intangibles in value screens, add quality filters, prefer small-cap value, and take more risk than Treasuries if income is needed.

Key Arguments: The market’s apparent randomness has a coherent macro explanation: when growth is scarce and liquidity is plentiful, investors crowd into a few cash-flowing winners and speculative long-duration bets. Low real interest rates let investors wait for distant payoffs, which supports expensive growth stocks and assets treated like long-dated call options. The value-vs-growth divide can be largely explained by rates, inflation expectations, and the business cycle; if those stay subdued, growth can keep outperforming. Traditional value investing is partially broken because accounting systems understate intangible capital, causing many modern businesses to look cheaper or more expensive than they really are. A sustained shift toward value and cyclical sectors would likely require higher inflation, stronger wage growth, and a policy regime that supports productivity investment. Fiscal and industrial policy—not just monetary easing—may be needed to escape secular stagnation and create a higher-growth regime. Investors can improve portfolio construction today by explicitly accounting for intangibles, adding quality screens, and favoring smaller value firms. Fixed income is especially challenged in a low-yield world, so investors seeking income may need to accept more credit or equity-like risk rather than cling to Treasuries.

Data Points: Length of Bloomberg Stock Movers reports: 5 minutes or less - Promotional copy describing the new audio stock report format. Corporate profit growth (broad U.S. measure): Essentially flat since about 2014 - Woodard says NIPA-style profits for broad corporate America have not grown meaningfully for years, excluding the pandemic shock. Intangible assets share of S&P 500 assets: 84% (third-party estimate) - Used to illustrate how much modern corporate value may be missing from traditional book-value accounting. Alternative estimate of intangible asset share: 50% to 60% - Woodard says even a lower estimate would still imply a large accounting gap. Median worker time to cover major fixed costs in 1980/1985: About 20 to 25 weeks - Example of how affordable middle-class life used to be relative to annual income. Median worker time to cover major fixed costs today: 53 weeks out of 52 - Used to show erosion in affordability and household capacity to consume. Consumption share of U.S. GDP: 60% to 70% - Why weak household income growth matters for overall economic growth. Value vs. growth underperformance period: Worst in history over the past 10 years - Woodard says the value factor has had its worst decade ever, worse than the dot-com era. Variance in value vs. growth explained by macro variables: About 80% - Woodard says interest rates, inflation expectations, and PMIs explain most of the spread. 10-year Treasury yield needed for value recovery: Roughly 0.6% to 1.8% - Illustrative scenario where value could regain ground versus growth. 5-year forward inflation expectations needed: 2.5% - Part of the scenario that would favor value stocks. SP 500 relative to 200-day moving average: Highest level since 2009 - Cited as evidence of a strong speculative rally. Expected return uplift from adding intangibles to value model: +3 percentage points per year - Independent and team research suggest adjusted book value improves value-strategy returns. Additional uplift from quality and small-cap value biases: +2 to +3 percentage points per year - Further enhancements to value-style portfolio construction. Federal semiconductor funding: $25 billion - Cited as evidence of bipartisan industrial-policy momentum. Bloomberg newsroom size referenced in promos: 3,000 journalists and analysts - Used in multiple podcast advertisements.

Pivotal Quotes: "I think there is some underlying truth to it, and there is a simple explanation." — Jared Woodard: Woodard responds to the idea that many different assets are moving together and frames it as a macro regime, not just chart illusion. "The bottom line is that when growth is scarce, growth stocks outperform." — Jared Woodard: Core summary of why expensive tech and other growth names keep leading in a low-growth world. "I think the more important shift to look out for... is what happens in public policy over the next several quarters, next several years." — Jared Woodard: He argues that policy, especially industrial policy, is the key catalyst for a real regime change.

Implications: For investors, the takeaway is that cross-asset correlations reflect a deeper macro regime, not just sentiment. Future leadership may stay with growth unless inflation, wages, and policy meaningfully change. Portfolio construction should be updated for intangibles and low yields.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Odd Lots

Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway analyze the weird patterns, the complex issues and the newest market crazes. Join the conversation every Tuesday and Thursday for interviews with the most interesting minds in finance, economics and markets.

View all episodes from Odd Lots