Trillions
Trillions

How First Trust Became a Quiet Force in ETFs

First Trust, the sixth-largest issuer of US exchange-traded funds, has managed to stay mostly under the radar in the investing world — and yet it's also perfected a lucrative, Vanguard-proof business model. The company's products are directed more at financial advisors than the retail worl

Featured Speakers

Bloomberg Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode examines First Trust’s unusual ETF model: it wins business by cultivating financial advisors through high-touch wholesaling, entertainment, and relationship management rather than ultra-low fees. Hosts and guests discuss how this strategy helps First Trust thrive as a private, quietly run firm in the Vanguard-driven ETF era, while also raising questions about potential FINRA pay-to-play boundary issues and an ongoing investigation.

Main Topics: First Trust’s Contrarian ETF Model (Priority: 5/5): First Trust stands out as a large but low-profile ETF issuer that avoids the industry’s usual low-fee, retail-marketing playbook and instead sells through advisors with a relationship-heavy approach. Wholesaling, Entertainment, and Advisor Access (Priority: 5/5): The company relies on wholesalers who pitch directly to financial advisors, using dinners, events, and frequent contact as part of a high-touch distribution strategy. Fees, Smart Beta, and Value Proposition (Priority: 4/5): First Trust charges higher-than-average ETF fees, but argues its smart-beta, active, and structured products offer intellectual property and potential outperformance that justify the cost. FINRA Rules and Potential Pay-to-Play Concerns (Priority: 5/5): The conversation highlights a gray area around entertainment expenses and an ongoing FINRA investigation into First Trust’s sales practices, including possible violations of pay-to-play norms. Jim Bowen and Corporate Culture (Priority: 3/5): CEO Jim Bowen is portrayed as charismatic, hands-on, and deeply committed to the firm’s mission, reinforcing the company’s advisor-centric identity. Surviving the Vanguard Effect (Priority: 4/5): The guests frame First Trust as a model for competing in an ETF market dominated by low-cost giants like Vanguard by selling differentiated products and service.

Key Arguments: First Trust is unusually successful for a private ETF issuer because it focuses on financial advisors, not retail brand marketing, and uses a dense wholesaler network to maintain relationships. Its funds are more expensive than the industry average, but they often include smart-beta or active strategies, allowing the firm to sell a value proposition beyond simple index tracking. The company’s relationship-driven sales culture may push close to FINRA’s limits on what counts as acceptable entertainment for advisors, especially when spending becomes too frequent or extensive. A fiduciary advisor can justify paying more for a differentiated strategy, but not for a plain-vanilla fund that replicates a cheaper alternative. First Trust’s Midwest/heartland orientation and direct, boots-on-the-ground presence may strengthen advisor loyalty compared with coastal, mass-marketing competitors. The firm’s success demonstrates one way legacy asset managers can survive in an ETF market where “everything is free” and price competition is extreme.

Data Points: ETF issuer rank: 6th largest - Emily Grafeo says First Trust is the sixth-largest ETF issuer by assets. Revenue scale vs. size: Nearly as much ETF revenue as Vanguard, while about 15x smaller - Bloomberg Intelligence data cited in the discussion. Advisor assets managed in the U.S.: $40 trillion - Eric Valturis describes advisors as gatekeepers of roughly this much money. First Trust ETF fees: 48 to 75 basis points - Eric notes First Trust funds are materially more expensive than average ETFs. Average ETF fee: 18 basis points - Used as comparison against First Trust’s pricing. Example of load fee: 4.75% - Eric explains historical mutual fund loads as an example of the old sales model. Hockey game example spending: $300 tickets + $300 food - Illustrates what could cross FINRA’s entertainment boundary. Hermès scarves spending: $4,800 - Mentioned as part of entertaining details uncovered in reporting. Hotel entertainment example: $70,000 - A cited expense tied to entertaining at a Ritz-Carlton in Florida. Ongoing investigation duration: At least 1 year - Emily says FINRA has been investigating First Trust’s sales practices for at least a year. Fund count: Over 100 ETFs - Emily describes the size of First Trust’s product lineup.

Pivotal Quotes: "We help the financial advisor because the financial advisor helps the client, and we love that." — Jim Bowen: Used to illustrate First Trust’s advisor-first philosophy and corporate identity. "The company was built on entertaining. It was and still is the leg up on our competition." — Wholesaler email cited by Emily Grafeo: Shows how entertaining advisors is treated as a core part of First Trust’s sales culture. "This is a story about a gray area." — Max Abelson: Summarizes the report’s central claim that First Trust may be near the boundary of permissible entertainment and pay-to-play rules.

Implications: First Trust shows that ETF firms can still win by selling service, access, and differentiated strategy, not just price. But its model also highlights regulatory risk as entertainment-driven sales sit near FINRA’s limits.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Trillions

Money goes where it's treated best. That simple truth is a big reason why more and more money—trillions, in fact—flows into a powerful, low-cost tool that's quietly transformed investing in recent years. Exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, let you invest in everything from the stock market to gold like never before. This biweekly podcast will demystify them—and delight you in the process.

View all episodes from Trillions