The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

How the Metaverse Might Actually Work — with Matthew Ball

Matthew Ball, a VC and author of “The Metaverse,” joins to discuss the winners and losers of the Metaverse, as well as some practical uses for the technology, such as in travel and defense. He previously served as the global head of strategy for Amazon Studios, so we also get his thoughts on streami

Featured Speakers

Matthew Ball Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode centers on two major threads: a skeptical-but-constructive exploration of the metaverse with Matthew Ball, and a forceful case that Amazon’s entry into healthcare could massively disrupt a bloated, fragmented industry. The hosts argue the metaverse is real but early, with the most credible opportunities in gaming, enterprise simulation, defense, and Apple’s future devices. They also discuss streaming consolidation and platform strategy.

Main Topics: Amazon’s entry into healthcare (Priority: 5/5): The host argues Amazon’s One Medical acquisition signals the start of a major healthcare disruption, especially in telehealth, preventive care, and insurance. He frames healthcare as a ripe target for Amazon’s data, logistics, and cloud capabilities. Metaverse: definition, maturity, and skepticism (Priority: 5/5): Matthew Ball explains the metaverse as a long-developing concept centered on 3D, persistent, synchronous digital environments. He stresses that current products and usage lag far behind the hype, especially relative to Meta’s spending. Winners and losers in the metaverse stack (Priority: 4/5): The conversation identifies likely beneficiaries such as Apple, NVIDIA, Epic Games, Microsoft, and brands selling digital goods. Meta’s efforts are described as underwhelming so far, with better positioning coming from hardware, engines, and infrastructure. Enterprise and defense use cases for 3D simulation (Priority: 4/5): Ball highlights practical uses beyond consumer hype, including digital twins for airports, urban planning, military training, and real-time operational modeling. These are presented as the most credible near-term applications of metaverse-like technology. Streaming wars and media consolidation (Priority: 3/5): Ball assesses Netflix, Apple TV+, Disney/Hulu, Paramount, Starz, Warner Bros. Discovery, and the possibility of broader platform bundling. He argues Apple is the strongest long-term contender, while the market is likely over-supplied. NFTs, virtual goods, and digital signaling (Priority: 3/5): The discussion suggests digital identity and status signaling will increasingly move online, benefiting companies with strong IP, game ecosystems, and premium brands that can sell virtual items. Firefighting and personal lessons (Priority: 2/5): Ball reflects on his years as a forest firefighter in Canada, emphasizing camaraderie, trust, hierarchy, and working toward a shared mission with people from very different backgrounds.

Key Arguments: Amazon’s healthcare move matters because US healthcare is expensive, inefficient, and heavily admin-burdened; Amazon can reduce friction using its scale, data, AWS, and consumer reach. The metaverse should be understood not as a wholesale replacement for the internet, but as a set of new protocols, devices, and behaviors enabling persistent 3D experiences. Meta has spent heavily but has not yet produced compelling user adoption, content, or product-market fit in VR/AR/Horizon Worlds. Epic Games and NVIDIA may be more central to the metaverse than Meta because they are deeply embedded in 3D simulation and graphics infrastructure. Apple is exceptionally well positioned because it controls hardware, silicon, the App Store, and will likely ship best-in-class AR/VR devices. The most durable metaverse-like value may emerge first in enterprise settings such as digital twins for airports, cities, defense, and logistics rather than in consumer social worlds. Streaming is likely to consolidate around platforms, and Apple appears best positioned due to device integration, content quality, and ecosystem leverage. Digital goods and virtual identity signaling are likely to grow, favoring premium brands and IP-rich entertainment franchises. Amazon is a more acceptable antitrust entrant in healthcare than in retail because it can challenge entrenched inefficiencies without the same level of self-preferencing concern. Firefighting taught transferable lessons about trust, shared purpose, and functioning inside strict hierarchies under pressure.

Data Points: One Medical acquisition price: $18 per share / $3.9 billion - Amazon’s all-cash acquisition of One Medical, cited as a sign of healthcare disruption. One Medical stock at highs: About $40 per share - Shows how much the company’s valuation fell before Amazon’s buyout. Healthcare admin time: 16 hours per week - Average time healthcare professionals spend on work outside patient visits. US healthcare spending: $4 trillion, or $12,500 per person - Used to argue the industry is oversized and inefficient. Healthcare spending share of GDP: About 20% - Illustrates the scale of US healthcare costs. Digital health startup investment in 2021: $29 billion across 729 deals - Evidence that investor interest in digital health was accelerating. Average digital health deal size: Around $40 million - Rock Health figure cited during the healthcare discussion. Telehealth Medicare visits: 840,000 in 2019 to 53 million in 2020 - Shows the pandemic-driven explosion in virtual care. Telehealth share of care: Less than 1% to about a third - Host’s summary of the shift toward virtual visits. Adults using telehealth in prior four weeks: Nearly 1 in 4 - Survey finding from 2021 about current telehealth usage. Children using telehealth: 20% of respondents with a child at home - Shows adoption among families. Americans without a regular care provider: Almost 1 in 4 - Used to argue telehealth can fill access gaps. Fortnite virtual goods revenue: Over $25 billion - Example of large-scale spending on virtual-only goods. Fortnite cosmetics vs luxury brands: Annual sales exceed Prada, Gucci, and Fenty - Used to show the scale of virtual-item spending. US Army HoloLens contract: $22 billion for 120,000 devices - Cited as a major defense use case for mixed reality devices. Planet Labs Earth scans: 6 by 6 foot scans of the entire Earth every day - Used to illustrate simulation and modeling applications. Potential metaverse revenue by end of decade: $2.5 trillion to $16 trillion - A range cited from Citibank, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, KPMG, and McKinsey estimates. People watching video globally: 5.5 billion people watch 2.6 hours per day - Used in the streaming discussion to show video’s scale. Americans watching video: 300 million Americans watch five and a half hours per day - Supports the claim that demand for video remains huge.

Pivotal Quotes: "The metaverse should not be thought as an overhaul to the internet nor something that will replace all mobile models, devices, or software." — Matthew Ball: Explaining that the metaverse is additive and evolutionary rather than a total reset. "The most disruptible business inside the most disruptible business is healthcare. Insurance." — Scott Galloway: Arguing that insurance is the highest-leverage target for Amazon’s healthcare expansion. "I would say that meta really has three different areas that they're spending time on... The Horizon Worlds platform has almost no users and even less content." — Matthew Ball: Assessing Meta’s current metaverse execution and product adoption.

Implications: The episode suggests the next major platform shifts will come from practical 3D simulation, healthcare digitization, and media bundling—not hype. Investors should focus on infrastructure, hardware, and enterprise use cases over consumer buzzwords.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

View all episodes from The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway