Episode Summary
Executive Summary: The episode centers on ARK’s Venture Fund (ARKVX) and how it uses an interval-fund structure to give everyday investors access to late-stage private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Neuralink. Kathy Wood, Brett Winton, and Charlie Roberts explain why they chose this vehicle over ETFs, how they source and price private investments, and why they avoid SPVs, arguing the structure delivers direct, research-driven, NAV-based venture exposure with liquidity and discipline.
Main Topics: Why ARK chose an interval fund over an ETF: Kathy Wood explains that ETF rules cap illiquid assets at 15%, which made the ETF wrapper unsuitable for a true venture portfolio. The interval fund allows ARK to hold roughly 80% private assets while still offering periodic liquidity. Direct private-company investing vs. SPVs: The team argues that ARKVX invests directly on cap tables and avoids layered SPVs, which they say create fee drag, opacity, and weak underwriting. They frame direct access and information rights as a key edge. Research-led selection and underwriting: ARK describes a deep research process that spans public and private markets, with analysts evaluating companies through technology-by-technology research, market sizing, traction, and unit economics before investing. NAV pricing and valuation discipline: The discussion emphasizes daily NAV pricing, separate pricing committees, third-party audits, and calibration against primary, secondary, and public-market signals to keep valuations aligned and avoid discounts/premiums. Liquidity, inflows, and democratizing venture: The fund is positioned as a way to democratize venture capital for non-accredited investors, with daily inflows and quarterly redemptions up to 5% of NAV, while still maintaining a venture-like exposure profile. Public-market transition and future optionality: The team says the fund can continue holding winners through IPOs, reallocate between the venture fund and ETFs as companies go public, and benefit from the coming wave of public listings from private AI and space companies.
Key Arguments: ARK says ETFs cannot hold enough illiquid assets to replicate a real venture portfolio because of the 15% illiquidity cap, so an interval fund is the proper structure. The fund is designed to democratize venture capital, including for investors who are not accredited, while preserving NAV-based pricing and limited redemption windows. ARK argues direct investing is superior to SPVs because it provides real information rights, avoids fee stacking, and enables true underwriting. The team claims its analysts underwrite private companies the same way they do public stocks, using detailed forecasting, market sizing, and traction analysis. ARK says companies prefer direct, informed investors over opaque SPV structures and dislike the volatility and reputational issues that can come from public-market-style trading. The pricing process is separated from the investment team and relies on daily monitoring, third-party audits, and comparison to primary and secondary market data. The fund is evergreen, so it can hold companies past IPO if conviction remains strong, unlike traditional venture funds that often have to sell at lockup expiration. ARK believes public-private valuation arbitrage creates opportunities, especially in sectors like biotech and AI. The firm argues that private exposure in ETFs is usually too diluted to matter, whereas ARKVX is structured so private assets are the core exposure. ARK believes private-company investing can also create strategic value through follow-on funding, enterprise introductions, and help with company storytelling and talent recruiting.
Data Points: Private exposure in fund: ~80% private / 20% public - ARK says ARKVX is built to be a true venture-style portfolio while preserving liquidity. ETF illiquidity limit: 15% - Kathy Wood cites this as the key reason ETFs cannot house the desired amount of private assets. Quarterly liquidity: Up to 5% of NAV - ARKVX offers redemptions each quarter rather than daily liquidity for the private sleeve. Minimum investment: $500 - Kathy says the fund is accessible to smaller investors. Fund fee: 2.75% - Discussed as high, but ARK says it is offset by no carry. Assets under management: $521 million - Brett says the fund has grown from around $500 million and is still accelerating. Weekly inflows: $10 million to $20 million per week - Brett says flows are increasing rapidly. Outperformance vs. S&P 500: 45 percentage points - Eric notes the fund has outperformed the S&P 500 by this amount. Reported fund gain since launch: 150% - Eric references the fund’s reported appreciation based on NAV. SpaceX weight in XOVR: Started near 10%, later ~3% - Used as a comparison to show how ETF exposure to SpaceX diluted as assets grew. XOVR assets: $1.5 billion - Used as an example of an ETF attracting large inflows despite only small private exposure. ARK Venture Fund assets: $500 million+ - Presented as smaller than some ETFs despite deeper private exposure. Public-private portfolio example: Kodiak went public and remained in the fund - Illustrates ARK’s ability to keep holdings through IPOs if conviction remains high. Example valuation jump: $2.7 billion to $39-40 billion - Kathy describes a company whose follow-on round was initially targeted at a much higher valuation than ARK’s research supported. Adjusted valuation used by ARK: About $20 billion - ARK says the company placed only about half the intended round, so ARK marked it lower than the headline target. Unofficial unicorn market size: ~$7 trillion - Eric references the broad private-company opportunity set fueling interest in public-private products.
Pivotal Quotes: "We wanted to provide venture for our client base. Much of which is not accredited." — Kathy Wood: Explaining the original motivation for creating ARKVX and choosing an interval fund structure. "We do not trade at a discount or a premium ever. We actually sell at NAV." — Kathy Wood: Responding to concerns that closed-end structures can trade at discounts or premiums. "If somebody invested in an SPV, that's a big blinking signal that they actually haven't had access to the underlying information of what's going on in the company." — Kathy Wood: Describing why ARK avoids SPVs and prefers direct company access and underwriting.
Implications: The conversation suggests demand for private-company exposure is pushing fund innovation, but structure matters: ETFs offer convenience, while interval funds can deliver deeper, more authentic venture access. If more private firms go public, NAV-based hybrid products may become a bigger bridge between venture and public markets.
From the Episode
Structure couldn't provide when you dreamed up the venture fund? Well, a few things. Early on, we were looking at the best way to democratize venture capital for our client base. And of course, we would have naturally gone to ETFs given that's pretty much all we do. And then we examined the structure and a big Big drawback for us given that we wanted to start a venture capital fund. A big drawback was the 15% illiquidity clause. You can't have more than 15% in illiquid assets. In an ETF wrapper, in an ETF wrapper. And so we started casting around. I'm going to give Tom Stout, our president and COO, a lot of credit for this. We wanted to provide venture for our client base. Much of which is not accredited. And we happened upon the interval fund structure. So it's not, I don't know if technically it's a mutual fund. I don't think it is. I think it's an interval fund. But when you're talking about regulations, sometimes you've got the mutual funds and the ETFs, both 40-act funds. The interval fund is a 40-act fund, but I don't think it's a mutual fund. In that fund structure,
Looks like one is the five-letter ticker. You know, all mutual funds have five-letter tickers, N's, and X. But I think more than that, it just seems to be like in this era, like people generally just want everything in an ETF. And there's a lot of people who felt maybe burned in mutual funds in the past. And closed-end funds aren't exactly like stellar reputation either because they trade at these big discounts. So I think part of the challenge for a fund like this is being in that camp and not being able to use the ETF's halo. Can I just correct one thing, Eric? We do not trade at a discount or a premium ever. We actually sell at NAV. And our pricing committee really is working to price the portfolio every day. If there's anything going on in any of the private funds, we're all over it in terms of valuation, whether it's on the Secondary markets or the mutual funds themselves. If we look at their marks at the end of a quarter and we see we're not aligned, we'll go back and do due diligence to either defend our price or change it. So we don't sell at a premium or a discount. It's a huge selling point for us. Charlie, I want to bring you in because we haven't heard from you yet. How does a strategist who now has an interval fund that you're going to?
One thing, you covered it very well, Charlie, in terms of the whole suite of things that we offer. And I'll circle back to the SPV point. If somebody, you know, we have the top-down research and the analysts do really good underwriting of the underlying asset. When we started ARC, I expected that the work we would do would be very similar to venture capitalists. But as it turns out, many venture capitalists never open a spreadsheet, whereas our analysts, you know, spend all of their time forecasting and modeling. And if somebody invested, An SPV, that's a big blinking signal that they actually haven't had access to the underlying information of what's going on in the company. Typically, the SPV sponsor is saying, hey, this is what we hear is happening, and they're receiving it like a game of telephone. So there's no real effective way to do actually an underwrite of a position. And I remember when Uber had its late-stage private round and it basically priced at saturation.
About Trillions
Money goes where it's treated best. That simple truth is a big reason why more and more money—trillions, in fact—flows into a powerful, low-cost tool that's quietly transformed investing in recent years. Exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, let you invest in everything from the stock market to gold like never before. This biweekly podcast will demystify them—and delight you in the process.