Masters of Scale
Masters of Scale

IBM’s $10 billion bet on what comes after AI

While many tech companies race to build ever-larger AI models, IBM CEO Arvind Krishna sees the future differently. Speaking with host Bob Safian before a live audience during New York Tech Week, Krishna explains why enterprises are overcomplicating AI adoption, what kinds of risks leaders should be

Featured Speakers

WaitWhat HostArvind Krishna Guest

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: IBM CEO Arvind Krishna argues that AI and quantum are entering a new, practical phase where enterprise value will come from fit-for-purpose systems, not one-size-fits-all hype. He says foundation models will commoditize, costs will rise, and winners will be firms that deploy AI safely at scale, use domain experts instead of PhDs, and take measured risks. He also frames quantum as IBM's next major platform bet.

Main Topics: IBM's reinvention and strategic positioning (Priority: 5/5): Krishna explains how IBM has repeatedly adapted across eras—mainframes, PCs, Java, hybrid cloud, AI, and quantum—by leveraging client trust, technical depth, and willingness to take some bets while acknowledging misses like client server and public cloud. AI economics, commoditization, and fit-for-purpose deployment (Priority: 5/5): He argues foundation models will become commodities, token costs will rise, and enterprises should avoid using giant models for every task. Instead, they should select the right model and deployment mode for the workload, safety, and economics. Enterprise AI adoption and change management (Priority: 5/5): Krishna says AI is already a major productivity tool, but most companies are still early in serious adoption. He urges leaders to start with a few use cases at scale, build organizational muscle, and rely on domain experts who can learn AI rather than only hiring AI PhDs. Productivity gains, job displacement, and workforce transition (Priority: 4/5): He claims AI is making software developers materially more productive while also reducing some back-office roles. At the same time, IBM is hiring more entry-level talent because AI lowers development costs and enables new products. He stresses upskilling and reskilling. Cybersecurity and AI-powered defense (Priority: 4/5): Krishna says AI lowers the barrier for attackers but also improves defense, especially in open source security. IBM's Project Life aims to use AI to identify and patch vulnerabilities at scale, turning security into a more industrialized utility. Quantum computing as the next platform shift (Priority: 4/5): He presents quantum as a long-term but increasingly tangible opportunity, describing recent progress in atom-scale simulations that could unlock applications in chemistry, biology, and drug discovery. IBM's $10 billion investment reflects confidence in commercial scale. Corporate risk-taking and culture (Priority: 5/5): Krishna argues the riskiest strategy is taking no risk. He says companies that avoid innovation shrink, lose margin, and become vulnerable. Leaders should tolerate experimentation, accept some failure, and create buffers so teams can take intelligent bets.

Key Arguments: IBM's advantages are client intimacy, trust, and technical expertise; its challenge is choosing the right bets early enough to match fast-moving technological waves. Watson was not just an early AI moment but a strategic misstep because IBM moved too quickly into a monolithic vertical application, chose a difficult domain, and lacked customer familiarity. Foundation models are likely to become commodities, which will reduce switching costs and force enterprises to optimize for cost and fit rather than brand loyalty. Current AI usage is like taking an 18-wheeler to the grocery store: powerful but inefficient for many tasks; smaller, on-prem, or specialized models can be far cheaper and better suited. Enterprise leaders should not wait for perfect AI expertise; they should identify motivated domain experts and deploy AI in a few high-value processes at scale to learn change management and operational integration. Early AI implementation can cost more than it saves, but once systems and workflows are standardized, returns can become substantial; IBM says it moved from net cost to multibillion-dollar annual savings. AI will not eliminate all jobs, but it will shift work: some back-office roles shrink while demand for product, development, and value-creating roles grows. Cybersecurity threats become more accessible as AI tools spread, meaning more organizations and nation-states can execute sophisticated attacks; defensive AI must scale accordingly. Quantum computing should be treated as a soon-to-be-important tool for specific workloads, especially molecular simulation, rather than as science fiction. The biggest leadership mistake is avoiding risk entirely; companies that stop innovating eventually get copied, lose margins, and decline. IBM wants to become a more software-centric company and a leading deployer of AI and agents, not a hyperscaler or foundation model vendor.

Data Points: Masters of Scale Summit 2026 dates: October 20 to 22, 2026 - Promotional mention at the beginning of the episode Hybrid cloud / AI deployment timeline: 24 months - Krishna predicts the market will shift toward smaller, more economical AI models within about two years Possible transition window for AI economics: 12-24 months - He says the economics of broad AI usage should become clearer within this period GPU pricing increase: doubled in the last 6 months - He cites rising underlying GPU costs as a reason AI use will get more expensive IBM AI efficiency savings: 4.5 billion dollars - He says IBM has unlocked about this much efficiency from AI Baseline spending referenced: 22 billion dollars - He says the current savings are measured against year-end 2022 spending First-year AI implementation result at IBM: more spending than savings - He notes the first 6-12 months of AI adoption likely cost more than they saved Year-two AI ROI at IBM: 10x return compared to spending - He says IBM saw a strong return once AI use was standardized at scale Year-four AI savings projection: over 5 billion dollars - He says IBM will be over this level of savings by year four Software developer productivity improvement: 40% more productive - He says IBM's software developers are about 40% more productive than two years ago College-level entry hiring change: tripled - He says IBM tripled entry-level hiring this year despite productivity gains Potential headcount reduction in some enterprise functions: about 30% - He says back-office and operational areas may not need this much headcount within a few years U.S. AI data center buildout claims: 125 gigawatts - He cites this as the claimed capacity coming online in the next two to three years Estimated total AI capex: 8 to 12 trillion dollars - He says the verbal promises imply this scale of investment Implied required profit to justify capex: close to 1 trillion dollars - He argues the economics do not support this level of profit Implied revenue needed to justify capex: about 4 trillion dollars more revenue - He says that is what the math would require in a best-case scenario IBM software mix in 2019: about 20% software - He contrasts IBM's prior business mix with its current one IBM software mix now: about 45% software - He says IBM has shifted substantially toward software Quantum simulation progress - summer 2025: 5 atoms - He describes early quantum simulation capability Quantum simulation progress - winter 2025: 300 atoms - He describes the next stage of quantum progress Quantum simulation progress - April 2026 timeframe: 12,000 atoms - He says IBM reached this scale, nearing protein-sized problems Open source security initiative: $5 billion - He references IBM's Project Life initiative to identify and fix AI vulnerabilities Quantum investment: $10 billion - He cites IBM's large-scale investment in quantum computing Model count he thinks may survive in a commodity market: 3 or 4 - He says there probably isn't room for a dozen foundation models long term

Pivotal Quotes: "I think foundation models are going to become commodities." — Arvind Krishna: He is describing the likely future AI market structure and why enterprise clients will optimize for cost and flexibility "I think right now we're using the 18-wheeler for everything." — Arvind Krishna: His analogy for overusing large AI models when smaller, cheaper, fit-for-purpose systems would be better "The most risky route is taking zero risk." — Arvind Krishna: He is explaining why companies that stop innovating slowly decline and become vulnerable

Implications: Enterprises should move from experimentation to selective, scaled AI deployment, optimize model choice by task, and prepare for workforce shifts. The next winners may be organizations that combine trust, operational discipline, and willingness to take smart risks across AI and quantum.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Masters of Scale

On Masters of Scale, iconic business leaders share lessons and strategies that have helped them grow the world's most fascinating companies. Founders, CEOs, and dynamic innovators join candid conversations about their triumphs and challenges with a set of luminary hosts, including founding host Reid Hoffman (LinkedIn co-founder and Greylock partner). From navigating early prototypes to expanding brands globally, Masters of Scale provides priceless insights to help anyone grow their dream ente...

View all episodes from Masters of Scale