Throughline
Throughline

ICE

What is ICE? What was it created to do? And what’s changed in 2025? Today on the show, the history of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and how it tracks the story of immigration, and politics, in the U.S. Guests: Peter Markowitz, professor at Cardozo School of Law in New York City and founder of

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode traces how U.S. immigration enforcement evolved from post-9/11 security panic into ICE’s current mass-deportation machine. It argues that ICE’s mandate has steadily expanded through legislation, databases, local-police cooperation, and huge funding increases, while today’s Trump-era tactics and scale are unprecedented and raising serious due-process and civil-liberties concerns.

Main Topics: Post-9/11 creation of DHS and ICE (Priority: 5/5): The transcript explains how 9/11 exposed intelligence and immigration failures, leading to the Homeland Security Act, the dissolution of INS, and the creation of ICE inside DHS as a counterterrorism and enforcement agency. The 1980s–1990s criminalization of immigration (Priority: 5/5): It shows how crime fears, drug panic, and anti-terror legislation increasingly fused immigration and criminal law, broadening deportable offenses and making immigration enforcement more punitive. Secure Communities and local policing (Priority: 5/5): A major turning point was the federal government’s ability to enlist local police through databases and fingerprint-sharing, which enabled ICE to identify and target more noncitizens after any arrest. ICE’s mission vs. its public rhetoric (Priority: 4/5): The episode contrasts official claims of targeting the "worst of the worst" with data and legal realities showing many detainees have no violent-crime record and are deported for civil or technical violations. Trump-era escalation and family separation (Priority: 5/5): It details how Trump 1.0 intensified rhetoric and family separation, and how Trump 2.0 has accelerated arrests, visibility, militarization, and the use of expedited removal. Funding, detention, and institutional power (Priority: 4/5): The program emphasizes the massive new funding streams for ICE, warning that unprecedented resources could expand detention, surveillance, and enforcement capacity far beyond prior norms. Debate over the meaning of ICE’s history (Priority: 4/5): Roger Werner sees present actions as part of a recurring pendulum in U.S. immigration politics, while Peter Markowitz argues internal and legal checks are eroding, creating a more dangerous system.

Key Arguments: 9/11 transformed immigration enforcement from a fragmented civil system into a homeland-security mission built around suspicion, risk, and prevention. Anti-immigrant and anti-terror legislation in the 1990s greatly expanded deportable offenses and normalized treating immigration as a criminal matter. Programs like Secure Communities allowed ICE to bypass local political resistance and identify deportable noncitizens through ordinary arrests and fingerprints. Many people deported by ICE are not violent criminals; some are detained for visa overstays, fraud, or minor offenses that are civil or low-level criminal violations. The agency’s real operational incentive has often been broad enforcement, not only the removal of dangerous offenders. Trump’s second-term approach marks a sharper break because of the scale, visibility, militarization, and bypassing of ordinary immigration-court processes. Massive funding may deepen detention, expand checkpoints and street operations, and weaken democratic and judicial constraints. Whether ICE is seen as normal enforcement or authoritarian overreach depends on one’s view of immigration policy and the legitimacy of deterrence. Peter argues that current legal, institutional, and Supreme Court checks are failing to restrain ICE’s most extreme actions. Roger argues that public demand for enforcement and deterrence has repeatedly driven these expansions over time.

Data Points: Hijackers identified: 19 names - FBI investigation identified the 9/11 hijackers within three days. Temporary visas: 19 of 19 hijackers were on temporary visas - All hijackers had entered from abroad and were in the U.S. on temporary visas. ICE recruitment bonus: up to $50,000 - ICE is offering signing bonuses to recruit more agents. July congressional funding: $170 billion - Congress approved major immigration and border-enforcement funding in July. Additional ICE funding: $75 billion - Part of the July package was dedicated to ICE. Largest government investment: most money ever invested in detention and deportation - The episode characterizes the package as the largest U.S. investment in these areas. Secure Communities participation under Bush: 14 jurisdictions - Only a small number of jurisdictions participated during the Bush administration. Secure Communities participation under Obama: more than 3,000 jurisdictions in all 50 states - The program expanded dramatically and became effectively nationwide. Family separations: more than 5,500 children - Official family-separation policy under Trump separated thousands of children from parents. Daily ICE arrests: more than 600 per day - Average daily arrest rate since the start of Trump’s second term. Detention goal: 3,000 detentions per day - A goal attributed to Stephen Miller for the second Trump term. Potential annual arrests at goal: more than 1 million per year - Projected annual total if the 3,000-per-day target were met. Military-scale funding comparison: more than any country in the world spends on its military in a year, excluding the U.S. and China - Used to illustrate the scale of the new immigration-enforcement budget. 2004 9/11 Commission report: released in 2004 - The commission’s findings arrived years after the attacks but shaped the policy debate.

Pivotal Quotes: "It’s against policy to engage in pre-9/11 thinking." — Roger Werner: He explains the post-9/11 enforcement mindset that prioritizes risk, suspicion, and prevention. "We are seeing injured people everywhere." — Unidentified reporter audio: Early reporting on the Oklahoma City bombing, which became a catalyst for tougher immigration and anti-terror laws. "The agency is moving to terminate cases... to use extrajudicial mechanisms to deport people." — Peter Markowitz: He describes ICE bypassing immigration courts and due-process safeguards in the second Trump term.

Implications: The episode suggests ICE has evolved into a powerful, politicized system with far-reaching detention and deportation capacity. If current trends continue, immigration enforcement may become more militarized, less judicially constrained, and more central to everyday U.S. life.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Throughline

View all episodes from Throughline