Unchained
Unchained

Is ETH on Its Way to Becoming Ultra-Sound Money? Yes, Says Justin Drake - Ep.262

Ethereum just went through its most complex upgrade ever. Justin Drake, researcher at the Ethereum Foundation, discusses what the upgrade, aka the London hard fork, means for ether’s future as what he calls "ultra-sound money." At the end of the episode, he also drops a few Bitcoin hot tak

Featured Speakers

Justin Drake Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Laura Shin interviews Justin Drake of the Ethereum Foundation about EIP-1559, Ethereum’s fee-burning upgrade, and why it could make ETH “ultrasound money.” Drake explains how fee burns, staking, and DeFi collateral all tighten ETH supply, why the Merge will sharply cut issuance and sell pressure, and why Ethereum’s evolving monetary policy may strengthen its long-term monetary premium.

Main Topics: Justin Drake’s Ethereum Foundation role and crypto background (Priority: 4/5): Drake traces his path from early Bitcoin involvement in 2013 to joining the Ethereum Foundation in 2017, where he worked on Ethereum 2 research, sharding, cryptography, and now the meme/layer-zero narrative around ultrasound money. What EIP-1559 changes (Priority: 5/5): The upgrade improves fee UX by making fees more predictable, introduces a base fee burn that destroys ETH, and can reduce MEV-driven reorg incentives while shifting Ethereum’s monetary policy toward scarcity. ETH as money and the concept of ultrasound money (Priority: 5/5): Drake defines money candidates, monetary premium, and sound money before arguing ETH becomes ‘ultrasound’ because it can be burned, staked, and locked in DeFi, potentially making supply shrink over time. The three scarcity engines: gas, solid, liquid (Priority: 4/5): The transcript uses water-state metaphors to describe ETH’s supply sinks: burn as gas, staking as frozen solid, and DeFi collateral as liquid trapped in pipes, all reducing liquid circulating ETH. The Merge and proof-of-stake economics (Priority: 5/5): Drake says the Merge will replace proof of work with proof of stake, lower issuance dramatically, improve security via slashing and economic efficiency, and likely push ETH supply into net deflation. Supply, sell pressure, and burn projections (Priority: 4/5): Discussion covers the ultrasound.money projections, the key variables affecting net issuance, and Drake’s claim that post-Merge ETH sell pressure will drop materially as miner issuance disappears and fees are burned. Bitcoin’s long-term security and Ethereum’s monetary evolution (Priority: 4/5): Drake argues Bitcoin cannot rely on fees alone for security and may face instability as issuance declines, while Ethereum is willing to change its monetary policy toward a more optimal long-term design.

Key Arguments: EIP-1559 improves user experience because most users can now estimate the fee they need and be included without overpaying. Burning the base fee reduces MEV-fueled reorg incentives and lowers the ability of miners/validators to extract value from transaction ordering. Ethereum already has meaningful monetary premium because ETH is used as collateral in DeFi, staking, and fee payments. Fee burning turns Ethereum usage into a direct driver of ETH scarcity: more network utility can mean more ETH destroyed. The Merge will drastically reduce issuance, and because burn already exceeded issuance in the first 24 hours of EIP-1559, ETH may become net deflationary. Proof-of-stake is far more economically efficient than proof of work because it avoids paying for hardware and electricity. Ethereum’s security model can be self-healing through slashing, unlike Bitcoin’s proof-of-work majority attack scenario. Bitcoin’s future reliance on fees alone is, in Drake’s view, unlikely to provide stable security because fees are too volatile and too small relative to the network’s needs. Ethereum has been willing to change monetary policy repeatedly, which Drake frames as a path toward a more optimal and durable system rather than rigid short-term predictability. The ultrasound money meme helps communicate Ethereum’s changing monetary properties and has spread through prominent community signaling, especially on Twitter.

Data Points: Date of episode: August 10, 2021 - Recorded after the EIP-1559 hard fork on Thursday, August 5, 2021. ETH burned in first 24 hours of EIP-1559: 4.6k ETH - Drake cites roughly 4.6 thousand ETH burned in the first day after launch. Dollar value burned in first 24 hours: ~$7 million - Estimated value of the ETH destroyed in the first day. Burn rate per minute: ~$5,000/minute - Approximate pace of ETH destruction after EIP-1559 launched. Proof-of-stake issuance in first 24 hours: 1,125 ETH - Drake compares issuance to burn to argue burn exceeded issuance. Burn vs issuance ratio: 4x - He says burn was greater than proof-of-stake issuance by about a factor of four. ETH staked in DeFi: ~10 million ETH - Drake says ETH is used as collateral in DeFi at this scale. ETH staked for validation: ~6.5 million ETH - Collateral locked in staking at the time of the interview. ETH staked overall economic security: ~$17–18 billion - Drake estimates the value securing the beacon chain before the Merge. Annual reduction in sell pressure post-Merge: ~7 million ETH/year - He claims proof-of-stake and fee burn will reduce ETH sold annually by this amount versus the previous system. Equivalent dollar impact: ~$20 billion/year - Drake translates 7 million ETH at current prices into roughly $20 billion of buy-pressure equivalent. Fee volume growth since Genesis: 10x per year for 6 years - He says Ethereum’s total fee volume has increased exponentially since launch. Gas limit at Genesis: 3 million gas/block - Used as a baseline for Ethereum scalability growth. Gas limit at time of interview: 15 million gas/block - Represents a 5x increase in throughput. Proof-of-work issuance reduction at Merge: ~10x - Drake says removing PoW cuts issuance dramatically. Triple halvening: >8x issuance reduction - His meme for the combined effect of multiple issuance cuts. ETH supply at expected peak: ~120 million ETH - Drake projects ETH supply could peak around the Merge. Bitcoin fee volume vs Ethereum: ~20x less on Bitcoin - He cites cryptofees.com to argue Bitcoin fee revenue is far smaller. BTC on Ethereum: ~1.5% of total Bitcoin supply - He says some BTC already lives on Ethereum via bridges/wrappers. Ethereum Foundation security expectation: More robust beacon-chain security before Merge - Motivation for hiring security researchers ahead of the proof-of-stake transition. Twitter accounts using the bat signal: 2,500+ - Community adoption of the ultrasound money meme.

Pivotal Quotes: "We’ve reached ultra Mach four in the sense that not only have we broken the ultrasound barrier, but we’ve broken it by a factor of four." — Justin Drake: Describing how first-day fee burn exceeded proof-of-stake issuance. "The idea here is that instead of overspending for security, let’s destroy the ETH, thereby reducing the ETH supply, basically strengthening the monetary properties of ETH." — Justin Drake: Explaining the monetary logic behind EIP-1559’s fee burn. "Ethereum is the accomplishment of Satoshi’s vision. It is Bitcoin. Ethereum is Bitcoin in that sense." — Justin Drake: His closing argument connecting Ethereum’s broader purpose to Bitcoin’s original mission.

Implications: If usage and staking keep rising, ETH could become structurally scarcer and more valuable over time. The Merge may sharply cut sell pressure, while the ultrasound meme helps mainstream Ethereum’s monetary thesis. Bitcoin, by contrast, may face harder security questions as issuance declines.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Unchained

View all episodes from Unchained